Tolerating ambiguity ambiguous words recruit the left inferior frontal gyrus in absence of a behavioral effect

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 19-30

  Hargreaves, Ian S ^a   Pexman, Penny M ^a   Pittman, Daniel J ^b   Goodyear, Bradley G ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Ambiguous words; Cerebral cortex; Decision making; FMRI; Left inferior frontal gyrus; Semantics; Visual word recognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 78651072137     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000062     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Badre, D., & Wagner, A. (2002). Semantic retrieval, mnemonic control, and prefrontal cortex. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 1, 206-218.
2. Badre, D., & Wagner, A. (2007). Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2883-2901.
3. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G. B., et al. (2002). The English Lexicon Project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. Washington University. Retrieved from http://elexicon. wustl.edu/ on 12 September 2007.
4. Balota, D. A., Paul, S. T., & Spieler, D. H. (1999). Attentional control of lexical processing pathways during word recognition and reading. In S. C. Garrod & M. J. Pickering (Eds.), Language processing (pp. 15-57). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
5. Beckmann, C., Jenkinson, M., & Smith, S. M. (2003). General multi-level linear modeling for group analysis in fMRI. NeuroImage, 20, 1052-1063.
6. Beretta, A., Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D. (2005). The effects of homonomy and polysemy on lexical access: An MEG study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 57-65.
7. Binder, J., McKiernan, K., Parsons, M., Westbury, C., Possing, E., Kaufman, J., et al. (2003). Neural correlates of lexical access during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 372-393.
8. Birn, R. M., Cox, R. W., & Bandettini, P. A. (2002). Detection versus estimation in event-related fMRI: Choosing the optimal stimulus timing. Neuroimage, 15, 252-264.
9. Borowsky, R., & Masson, M. (1996). Semantic ambiguity effects on word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 63-85.
10. Bowers, J. (2002). Challenging the widespread assumption that connectionism and distributed representations go hand-inhand. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 413-445.
11. Chan, A., Liu, H. L., Yip, V., Fox, P. T., Gao, J. H., & Tan, L. H. (2004). Neural systems for word meaning modulated by semantic ambiguity. NeuroImage, 22, 1128-1133.
12. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
13. Copland, D., de Zubicaray, G., McMahon, K., & Eastburn, M. (2007). Neural correlates of semantic priming for ambiguous words: An event-related fMRI study. Brain Research, 1131, 163-172.
14. Crinion, J., Lambon-Ralph, M., Warburton, E., Howard, D., & Wise, R. (2003). Temporal lobe regions engaged during normal speech comprehension. Brain, 126, 1193-1201.
15. Dun̈abeitia, J. A., Avilés, A., & Carreiras, M. (2008). NoA's ark: Influence of the number of associates in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1072-1077.
16. Forman, S. D., Cohen, J. D., Fitzgerald, M., Eddy, W. F., Mintun, M. A., & Noll, D. C. (1995). Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): Use of a cluster-size threshold. Magnetic Resonance Medicine, 33, 636-647.
17. Friston, K. (2002). Beyond phrenology: What can neuroimaging tell us about distributed circuitry? Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 221-250.
18. Gilhooly, K., & Logie, R. (1980). Meaning-dependent ratings of imagery, age of acquisition, familiarity, and concreteness for 387 ambiguous words. Behaviour Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, 428-450.
19. Gold, B., Balota, D., Jones, S., Powell, D., Smith, C., & Anderson, A. (2006). Dissociation of automatic and strategic lexical-semantics: Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for differing roles of multiple frontotemporal regions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 6523-6532.
20. Grainger, J., Van Kang, M., & Segui, J. (2001). Cross-modal repetition priming of heterographic homophones. Memory & Cognition, 29, 53-61.
21. Grondin, R., Lupker, S. J., & McRae, K. (2009). Shared features dominate semantic richness effects for concrete concepts. Journal of Memory & Language, 60, 1-19.
22. Hamilton, A. C., & Martin, R. C. (2005). issociations among tasks involving inhibition: A single-case study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 1-13.
23. Heil, M., Rolke, B., & Pecchinenda, A. (2004). Automatic semantic activation is no myth; Semantic context effects on the N400 in the letter-search task in the absence of response time effects. Psychological Science, 15, 852-857.
24. Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. (1996). Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1331-1356.
25. Hino, Y., Pexman, P., & Lupker, S. (2006). Ambiguity and relatedness effects in semantic tasks: Are they due to semantic coding? Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 247-273.
26. Jastrzembski, J., & Stanners, R. (1975). Multiple word meanings and lexical search speed. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 534-537.
27. Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M., & Smith, S. (2002). Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuro-Image, 17, 825-841.
28. Jenkinson, M., & Smith, S. M. (2001). A global optimization method for robust affine registration of brain images. Medical Image Analysis, 5, 143-156.
29. Jonides, J., Smith, E., Marsheutz, C., Koeppe, R., & Reuter- Lorenz, P. (1998). Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 95, 8410-8413.
30. Klepousniotou, E., & Baum, S. (2007). Disambiguating the ambiguity advantage effect in word recognition: An advantage for polysemous but not homonymous words. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20, 1-24.
31. Locker, L. Jr., Simpson, G., & Yates, M. (2003). Semantic neighborhood effects on the recognition of ambiguous words. Memory & Cognition, 31, 505-515.
32. Mason, R., & Just, M. (2007). Lexical ambiguity in sentence comprehension. Brain Research, 1146, 115-127.
33. Masson, M., & Borowsky, R. (1995). Unsettling questions about semantic ambiguity in connectionist models: Comment on Joordens and Besner (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 509-514.
34. Mathis, A., Schunck, T., Erb, G., Jaques Namer, I., & Luthringer, R. (2009). The effect of aging on the inhibitory function in middle-aged subjects: A functional MRI study coupled with a color-matched Stroop task. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 24, 1062-1071.
35. Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100, 99-130.
36. Milham, M., Erickson, K., Banich, M., Kramer, A., Webb, A., Wszalek, T., & Cohen, N. (2002). Attention control in the aging brain: Insights from an fMRI study of the Stroop task. Brain and Cognition, 49, 277-296.
37. Müller, R. A., Kleinhans, N., & Courchesne, E. (2003). Linguistic theory and neuroimaging evidence: An fMRI study of Broca's area in lexical semantics. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1199-1207.
38. Murphy, G. L. (2004). The big book of concepts. MA: Cambridge.
39. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Retrieved from http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
40. Pexman, P. M., Hargreaves, S. I., Edwards, J. D., Henry, L. C., & Goodyear, B. G. (2007a). Neural correlates of concreteness in semantic categorization. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(8), 1407-1419.
41. Pexman, P. M., Hargreaves, I. S., Edwards, J. D., Henry, L. C., & Goodyear, B. G. (2007b). The neural consequences of semantic richness: When more comes to mind, less activation is observed. Psychological Science, 18, 401-406.
42. Pexman, P., Hargreaves, I., Siakaluk, P., Bodner, G., & Pope, J. (2008). There are many ways to be rich: Effects of three measures of semantic richness on word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(1), 161-167.
43. Pexman, P., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. (2004). Semantic ambiguity and the process of generating meaning from print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1252-1270.
44. Pexman, P. M., Holyk, G. G., & Monfils, M. H. (2003). Numberof features effects and semantic processing. Memory & Cognition, 31, 842-855.
45. Pexman, P., & Lupker, S. (1999). The impact of semantic ambiguity on visual word recognition: Do homophone and polysemy effects co-occur? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 323-334.
46. Pexman, P., Lupker, S., & Hino, Y. (2002). The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number-offeatures effects in lexical decision and naming tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 542-549.
47. Piercey, J., & Joordens, S. (2000). Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: Ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks. Memory & Cognition, 28, 139-156.
48. Poldrack, R., & Wagner, A. (2004). What can neuroimaging tell us about the mind? Insights from prefrontal cortex. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 177-181.
49. Roberts, K., & Hall, D. (2008). Examining a supramodal network for conflict processing: A systematic review and novel functional magnetic resonance imaging data for related visual and auditory Stroop tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1063-1078.
50. Rodd, J., Davis, M., & Johnsrude, I. (2005). The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1261-1269.
51. Rodd, J., Gaskell, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2002). Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 245-266.
52. Rodd, J., Gaskell, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2004). Modeling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition. Cognitive Science, 28, 89-104.
53. Siakaluk, P., Pexman, P., Sears, C., & Owen, W. (2007). Multiple meanings are not necessarily a disadvantage in semantic processing: Evidence from homophone effects in semantic categorisation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 453-467.
54. Smith, S. (2002). Fast robust automated brain extraction. Human Brain Mapping, 17, 143-155.
55. Snyder, H. R., Feigenson, K., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2007). Prefrontal cortical responses to conflict during semantic and phonological tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroimaging, 19, 761-775.
56. Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. New York: Thieme.
57. Thompson-Schill, S. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of semantic memory: Inferring ";how" from "where". Neuropsychologia, 41, 280-292.
58. Thompson-Schill, S., D'Esposito, M., Aguirre, G., & Farah, M. (1997). Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 94, 14792-14797.
59. Wagner, A., Paré-Blagoev, E. J., Clark, J., & Poldrack, R. (2001). Recovering meaning: Left prefrontal cortex guides controlled semantic retrieval. Neuron, 31, 329-338.
60. Wise, R., & Price, C. (2006). Functional neuroimaging of language. In R. Cabeza & A. Kingstone (Eds.), Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition (pp. 191-227) (2nd ed.). London, England: The MIT Press.
61. Woolrich, M. W., Behrens, T. E. J., Beckmann, C. F., Jenkinson, M., & Smith, S. M. (2004). Multi-level linear modeling for fMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference. NeuroImage, 21, 1732-1747.
62. Woolrich, M. W., Ripley, B. D., Brady, J. M., & Smith, S. M. (2001). Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of fMRI data. NeuroImage, 14, 1370-1386.
63. Zeno, S. M., Ivens, S. H., Millard, R. T., & Duvvuri, R. (Eds.), The educator's word frequency guide. Brewster, NJ: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.
64. Zempleni, M. Z., Renken, R., Hoeks, J., Hoogduin, J., & Stowe, L. (2007). Semantic ambiguity processing in sentence context: Evidence from event-related fMRI. NeuroImage, 34, 1270-1279. (Pubitemid 46394467)
65. Zhang, J. X., Feng, C. M., Fox, P. T., Gao, J. H., & Tan, L. H. (2004). Is left inferior frontal gyrus a general mechanism for selection? NeuroImage, 23, 596-603.