The neural consequences of semantic richness: When more comes to mind, less activation is observed: Research report

Psychological Science

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 401-406

  Pexman, Penny M ^a   Hargreaves, Ian S ^a   Edwards, Jodi D ^b   Henry, Luke C ^a   Goodyear, Bradley G ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CONCEPT FORMATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUE; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CONCEPT FORMATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 34250380371     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01913.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Balota, D.A., Cortese, M.J., Hutchison, K.A., Neely, J.H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G.B. Treiman, R. (2002). The English Lexicon Project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. Retrieved November 2, 2005, from
2. Becker, S., Moscovitch, M., Behrmann, M. Joordens, S. (1997). Long-term semantic priming: A computational account and empirical evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1059 1082.
3. Beckmann, C., Jenkinson, M. Smith, S.M. (2003). General multi-level linear modeling for group analysis in fMRI. NeuroImage, 20, 1052 1063.
4. Buchanan, L., Westbury, C. Burgess, C. (2001). Characterizing semantic space: Neighborhood effects in word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 531 544.
5. Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 33, 497 505.
6. Forman, S.D., Cohen, J.D., Fitzgerald, M., Eddy, W.F., Mintun, M.A. Noll, D.C. (1995). Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): Use of a cluster-size threshold. Magnetic Resonance Medicine, 33, 636 647.
7. Grondin, R., Lupker, S.J. McRae, K. (2006). Shared features dominate the number-of-features effect. In R. Sun (Ed.), Proceedings of the Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1400 1405). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
8. Henson, R.N.A. Rugg, M.D. (2003). Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioral priming. Neuropsychologia, 41, 263 270.
9. Hino, Y., Pexman, P.M. Lupker, S.J. (2006). Ambiguity and relatedness effects in semantic tasks: Are they due to semantic coding? Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 247 273.
10. James, T.W. Gauthier, I. (2006). Repetition-induced changes in BOLD response reflect accumulation of neural activity. Human Brain Mapping, 27, 37 46.
11. Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M. Smith, S. (2002). Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage, 17, 825 841.
12. Jenkinson, M. Smith, S.M. (2001). A global optimization method for robust affine registration of brain images. Medical Image Analysis, 5, 143 156.
13. Koenig, P., Smith, E.E., Glosser, G., DeVita, C., Moore, P., McMillan, C., et al 2005). The neural basis for novel semantic categorization. NeuroImage, 24, 369 383.
14. Nelson, D.L., McEvoy, C.L. Schreiber, T.A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Retrieved November 2, 2005, from
15. Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain. (n.d.). Software library. Retrieved October 2, 2005, from
16. Pexman, P.M., Holyk, G.G. Monfils, M.-H. (2003). Number of features effects and semantic processing. Memory & Cognition, 31, 842 855.
17. Pexman, P.M., Lupker, S.J. Hino, Y. (2002). The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number of features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 542 549.
18. Plaut, D.C. Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377 500.
19. Neurobehavioral Systems. (n.d.). Presentation® software (Version 10.3) [Computer software]. Retrieved November 2, 2005, from
20. Rissman, J., Eliassen, J.C. Blumstein, S.E. (2003). An event-related fMRI investigation of implicit semantic priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1160 1175.
21. Siakaluk, P.D., Buchanan, L. Westbury, C. (2003). The effect of semantic distance in yes/no and go/no-go semantic categorization tasks. Memory & Cognition, 31, 100 113.
22. Smith, S. (2002). Fast robust automated brain extraction. Human Brain Mapping, 17, 143 155.
23. Talairach, J. Tournoux, P. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. New York : Thieme.
24. Wheatley, T., Weisberg, J., Beauchamp, M.S. Martin, A. (2005). Automatic priming of semantically related words reduces activity in the fusiform gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1871 1885.
25. Wible, C.G., Han, S.D., Spencer, M.H., Kubicki, M., Niznikiewicz, M.H., Jolesz, F.A., et al 2006). Connectivity among semantic associates: An fMRI study of semantic priming. Brain and Language, 97, 294 305.
26. Wig, G.S., Grafton, S.T., Demos, K.E. Kelley, W.M. (2005). Reductions in neural activity underlie behavioral components of repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1228 1233.
27. Wilkinson, D.T., Halligan, P.W., Henson, R.N.A. Dolan, R.J. (2002). The effects of interdistracter similarity on search processes in the superior parietal cortex. NeuroImage, 1, 611 619.
28. Woolrich, M.W., Behrens, T.E.J., Beckmann, C.F., Jenkinson, M. Smith, S.M. (2004). Multi-level linear modeling for fMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference. NeuroImage, 21, 1732 1747.
29. Woolrich, M.W., Ripley, B.D., Brady, J.M. Smith, S.M. (2001). Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of fMRI data. NeuroImage, 14, 1370 1386.