Genome-wide marker-assisted selection combining all pedigree phenotypic information with genotypic data in one step: An example using broiler chickens

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 23-28

  Chen, C Y ^a,b   Misztal, I ^b   Aguilar, I ^b,c   Tsuruta, S ^b   Meuwissen, T H E ^d   Aggrey, S E ^b   Wing, T ^e   Muir, W M ^f  

^a Newsham Choice Genetics   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA INIA   (Uruguay)

^d NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^e Cobb Vantress Inc ^*  (United States)

^f PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chicken; Genetic evaluation; Genomic prediction

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHICKEN; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOTYPE; MALE; PEDIGREE;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOME; GENOTYPE; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PEDIGREE;

ANIMALIA; GALLUS GALLUS;

EID: 78650992306     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: 15253163     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2010-3071     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Aguilar, I., I. Misztal, D. L. Johnson, A. Legarra, S. Tsuruta, and T. J. Lawlor. 2010. A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J. Dairy Sci. 93:743-752.
2. Dekkers, J. C. M., C. Stricker, R. L. Fernando, D. J. Garrick, S. J. Lamont, N. P. O'Sullivan, J. E. Fulton, J. Arango, P. Settar, A. Kranis, J. McKay, K. A. Watson, A. Koerhuis, and R. Preisinger. 2009. Implementation of genomic selection in egg layer chickens. J. Anim. Sci. 87(E-Suppl. 2):iii. (Abstr.)
3. Goddard, M. 2009. Genomic selection: Prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 136:245-257.
4. González-Recio, O., D. Gianola, G. J. M. Rosa, K. A. Weigel, and A. Kranis. 2009. Genome-assisted prediction of a quantitative trait measured in parents and progeny: Application to food conversion rate in chickens. Genet. Sel. Evol. 41:3-13.
5. Groenen, M. A. M., P. Wahlberg, M. Foglio, H. H. Cheng, H. J. Megens, R. P. M. A. Crooijmans, F. Besnier, M. Lathrop, W. M. Muir, G. K. Wong, I. Gut, and L. Andersson. 2009. A highdensity SNP-based linkage map of the chicken genome reveals sequence features correlated with recombination rate. Genome Res. 19:510-519.
6. Hayes, B. J., P. J. Bowman, A. J. Chamberlain, and M. E. Goddard. 2009. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. J. Dairy Sci. 92:433-443.
7. Legarra, A., C. Robert-Granie, E. Manfredi, and J. M. Elsen. 2008. Performance of genomic selection in mice. Genetics 180:611-618.
8. Meuwissen, T. H. E., B. J. Hayes, and M. E. Goddard. 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157:1819-1829.
9. Misztal, I., A. Legarra, and I. Aguilar. 2009. Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. J. Dairy Sci. 92:4648-4655.
10. Misztal, I., S. Tsuruta, T. Strabel, B. Auvray, T. Druet, and D. H. Lee. 2002. BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90). Proc. 7th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. Montpellier, France. Commun. No. 28-07.
11. Muir, W. M. 2007. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUPestimated breeding valueaccuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 124:342-355.
12. Neuner, S., C. Edel, R. Emmerling, G. Thaller, and K. U. Götz. 2009. Precision of genetic parameters and breeding values estimated in marker assisted BLUP genetic evaluation. Genet. Sel. Evol. 41:26.
13. Pollak, E. J., J. van der Werf, and R. L. Quaas. 1984. Selection bias and multiple trait evaluation. J. Dairy Sci. 67:1590-1595.
14. Tsuruta, S., I. Misztal, and I. Stranden. 2001. Use of the preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm as a generic solver for mixed-model equations in animal breeding applications. J. Anim. Sci. 79:1166-1172.
15. Van Vleck, L. D. 1968. Selection bias in estimation of the genetic correlation. Biometrics 24:951-962.
16. VanRaden, P. M. 2008. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 91:4414-4423.
17. VanRaden, P. M., C. P. Van Tassell, G. R. Wiggans, T. S. Sonstegard, R. D. Schnabel, J. F. Taylor, and F. S. Schenkel. 2009. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 92:16-24.