Complexity of the tensegrity structure for dynamic energy and force distribution of cytoskeleton during cell spreading

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 12, 2010, Pages

  Chen, Ting Jung ^a   Wu, Chia Ching ^a   Tang, Ming Jer ^a   Huang, Jong Shin ^a   Su, Fong Chin ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIN FILAMENT; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL ENERGY; CELL FUNCTION; CELL SPREADING; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSKELETON; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; FOCAL ADHESION; FORCE; MICROTUBULE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PHYSICAL PHENOMENA; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TENSEGRITY STRUCTURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOPHYSICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; METABOLISM; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ACTIN;

ACTINS; ALGORITHMS; BIOPHYSICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOSKELETON; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FOCAL ADHESIONS; HUMANS; MICROTUBULES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 78650989329     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014392     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Coughlin MF, Stamenovic D (1998) A tensegrity model of the cytoskeleton in spread and round cells. J Biomech Eng 120: 770-777.
2. Ingber DE (2006) Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again. FASEB J 20: 811-827.
3. Ingber DE (2008) Tensegrity-based mechanosensing from macro to micro. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 97: 163-179.
4. Ingber DE, Dike L, Hansen L, Karp S, Liley H, et al. (1994) Cellular tensegrity: exploring how mechanical changes in the cytoskeleton regulate cell growth, migration, and tissue pattern during morphogenesis. Int Rev Cytol 150: 173-224.
5. Chicurel ME, Chen CS, Ingber DE (1998) Cellular control lies in the balance of forces. Curr Opin Cell Biol 10: 232-239.
6. Wang N, Ingber DE (1994) Control of Cytoskeletal Mechanics by Extracellular- Matrix, Cell-Shape, and Mechanical Tension. Biophysical Journal 66: 2181-2189.
7. ang N, Naruse K, Stamenovic D, Fredberg JJ, Mijailovich SM, et al. (2001) Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 7765-7770.
8. Coughlin MF, Stamenovic D (2003) A prestressed cable network model of the adherent cell cytoskeleton. Biophys J 84: 1328-1336.
9. Maurin B, Canadas P, Baudriller H, Montcourrier P, Bettache N (2008) Mechanical model of cytoskeleton structuration during cell adhesion and spreading. J Biomech 41: 2036-2041.
10. Paul R, Heil P, Spatz JP, Schwarz US (2008) Propagation of mechanical stress through the actin cytoskeleton toward focal adhesions: model and experiment. Biophys J 94: 1470-1482.
11. Roy S, Qi HJ (2008) Micromechanical model for elasticity of the cell cytoskeleton. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 77: 061916.
12. Satcher R, Dewey CF, Jr., Hartwig JH (1997) Mechanical remodeling of the endothelial surface and actin cytoskeleton induced by fluid flow. Microcirculation 4: 439-453.
13. Nagayama K, Matsumoto T (2008) Contribution of actin filaments and microtubules to quasi-in situ tensile properties and internal force balance of cultured smooth muscle cells on a substrate. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 295: C1569-C1578.
14. Stamenovic D, Mijailovich SM, Tolic-Norrelykke IM, Chen J, Wang N (2002) Cell prestress. II. Contribution of microtubules. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282: C617-C624.
15. Canadas P, Laurent VM, Oddou C, Isabey D, Wendling S (2002) A cellular tensegrity model to analyse the structural viscoelasticity of the cytoskeleton. J Theor Biol 218: 155-173.
16. Canadas P, Wendling-Mansuy S, Isabey D (2006) Frequency response of a viscoelastic tensegrity model: Structural rearrangement contribution to cell dynamics. J Biomech Eng 128: 487-495.
17. Sultan C, Stamenovic D, Ingber DE (2004) A computational tensegrity model predicts dynamic rheological behaviors in living cells. Ann Biomed Eng 32: 520-530.
18. Pugh A (1976) An introduction to tensegrity. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.
19. McGarry JG, Prendergast PJ (2004) A three-dimensional finite element model of an adherent eukaryotic cell. Eur Cell Mater 7: 27-33; discussion 33-24.
20. Wendling S, CaNadas P, Oddou C, Meunier A (2002) Interrelations between elastic energy and strain in a tensegrity model: contribution to the analysis of the mechanical response in living cells. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 5: 1-6.
21. Wendling S, Canadas P, Chabrand P (2003) Toward a generalised tensegrity model describing the mechanical behaviour of the cytoskeleton structure. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 6: 45-52.
22. Kenner H (1976) Geodesic math and how to use it. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.
23. Gittes F, Mickey B, Nettleton J, Howard J (1993) Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape. J Cell Biol 120: 923-934.
24. Boal DH (1997) Mechanical properties of the cellular cytoskeleton. Physics in Canada September/October. pp 228-236.
25. Stamenovic D, Coughlin MF (1999) The role of prestress and architecture of the cytoskeleton and deformability of cytoskeletal filaments in mechanics of adherent cells: a quantitative analysis. J Theor Biol 201: 63-74.
26. Stamenovic D, Coughlin MF (2000) A quantitative model of cellular elasticity based on tensegrity. J Biomech Eng 122: 39-43.
27. Thoumine O, Cardoso O, Meister JJ (1999) Changes in the mechanical properties of fibroblasts during spreading: a micromanipulation study. Eur Biophys J 28: 222-234.
28. Tolic-Norrelykke IM, Wang N (2005) Traction in smooth muscle cells varies with cell spreading. J Biomech 38: 1405-1412.
29. Laurent VM, Fodil R, Canadas P, Fereol S, Louis B, et al. (2003) Partitioning of cortical and deep cytoskeleton responses from transient magnetic bead twisting. Ann Biomed Eng 31: 1263-1278.
30. Dupuis DE, Guilford WH, Wu J, Warshaw DM (1997) Actin filament mechanics in the laser trap. Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility 18: 17-30.
31. Kojima H, Ishijima A, Yanagida T (1994) Direct measurement of stiffness of single actin filaments with and without tropomyosin by in vitro nanomanipulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 12962-12966.
32. Tuszynski JA, Luchko T, Portet S, Dixon JM (2005) Anisotropic elastic properties of microtubules. Eur Phys J E Soft Matter 17: 29-35.
33. Ingber DE (2000) Opposing views on tensegrity as a structural framework for understanding cell mechanics. J Appl Physiol 89: 1663-1670.
34. Volokh KY, Vilnay O, Belsky M (2000) Tensegrity architecture explains linear stiffening and predicts softening of living cells. J Biomech 33: 1543-1549.
35. Ingber DE (2003) Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J Cell Sci 116: 1157-1173.
36. Luo Y, Xu X, Lele T, Kumar S, Ingber DE (2008) A multi-modular tensegrity model of an actin stress fiber. J Biomech 41: 2379-2387.
37. Munevar S, Wang Y, Dembo M (2001) Traction force microscopy of migrating normal and H-ras transformed 3T3 fibroblasts. Biophys J 80: 1744-1757.
38. Gavara N, Roca-Cusachs P, Sunyer R, Farre R, Navajas D (2008) Mapping cellmatrix stresses during stretch reveals inelastic reorganization of the cytoskeleton. Biophys J 95: 464-471.
39. Hur SS, Zhao Y, Li YS, E. B, S. C (2009) Live Cells Exert 3-Dimensional Traction Forces on Their Substrata. Cell Mol Bioeng 2: 425-436.
40. Brangwynne CP, MacKintosh FC, Kumar S, Geisse NA, Talbot J, et al. (2006) Microtubules can bear enhanced compressive loads in living cells because of lateral reinforcement. J Cell Biol 173: 733-741.
41. Coughlin MF, Stamenovic D (1997) A tensegrity structure with buckling compression elements: Application to cell mechanics. Journal of Applied Mechanics-Transactions of the Asme 64: 480-486.