Futures beyond disruptions: Methodological reflections on scenario planning

Futures

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 130-133

  Marchais Roubelat, Anne ^a   Roubelat, Fabrice ^b  

^a Bioinformatique et Chimie Moléculaire   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLANNING METHOD;

EID: 78650982201     PISSN: 00163287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2010.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Berger's Works are Discussed in F. Roubelat, The Prospective Approach: Contingent and Necessary Evolutions, in: R. Slaughter (Ed.), The Knowledge Base of Futures Studies, DDM, Melbourne, 1996, pp. 106-119.
2. Ramirez R., Selsky J., Van der Heijden K. Business Planning for Turbulent Times 2008, Earthscan, London.
3. Fukuyama F. The end of history?. The National Interest 1989, (Summer (16)):3-18.
4. Fukuyama F. Has history started again?. Policy 2002, 28(2):3-7.
5. To borrow a metaphor from Gaston Berger. G. Berger, Sciences humaines et prévision, La revue des deux mondes, n°3 (February 1957), reprinted in Phénoménologie du temps et prospective, PUF, Paris, 1964, pp. 218-226.
6. Marchais-Roubelat A., Roubelat F. Designing action based scenarios. Futures 2008, 40(1):25-33.
7. Inayatullah S. Beyond the pendulum of the general and the landlord-politician: understanding and creating alternative futures for Pakistan. Journal of Futures Studies 2008, 12(May (4)):69-76.
8. Barel Y. The idea of reproduction. Futures 1974, 6(2):93-102.
9. S. Inayatullah (Ed.), Scenario symposium, Journal of Futures Studies 13 (3) (2009) 75-156.
10. Quoting the oft-searched triptych specified by the late Dressage Master, Simon Déissard.