DigiSwitch: Design and evaluation of a device for older adults to preserve privacy while monitoring health at home

IHI'10 - Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 153-162

  Caine, Kelly E ^a   Zimmerman, Celine Y ^a   Schall Zimmerman, Zachary ^a   Hazlewood, William R ^a   Sulgrove, Alexander C ^a   Camp, L Jean ^a   Connelly, Katherine H ^a   Huber, Lesa L ^a   Shankar, Kalpana ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

aging in place; health monitoring; home; older adult; privacy

Indexed keywords

AGING IN PLACE; HEALTH MONITORING; HOME; OLDER ADULTS; PRIVACY;

DATA PRIVACY; DESIGN; HEALTH CARE; INFORMATION SCIENCE; MONITORING;

HEALTH;

EID: 78650939636     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1882992.1883016     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. th Privacy Enhancing Technologies Workshop (PET), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4258, 36-58.
2. Administration on Aging. Retrieved Mar 1, 2010. http://www.aoa.gov
3. Beach, S., Schulz, R. Bruin, W., Downs, J., Musa, D., and Matthews, J. 2008. Privacy attitudes and quality of life technology in disabled and non-disabled baby boomers and older adults. The Gerontologist, 48, 2 (Nov. 2008), 46.
4. Bellotti, V., Back, M., Edwards, W.K., Grinter, R.E., Henderson, A, and Lopes, C. 2002. Making sense of sensing systems: five questions for designers and researchers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Minneapolis, MN, April 20-25, 2002).
5. Blanson Henkemans, O. A., Caine, K.E, Rogers, W.A., Fisk, A.D., Neerinex, M.A., and de Ruyter, B. 2007. Medical monitoring for independent living: user-centered design of smart home technologies for older adults. In Proceedings of the Med-e-Tel Conference for eHealth, Telemedicine and Health Information and Communication Technologies (Luxembourg City, Luxembourg, April 18-20, 2007).
6. Bishop, L.S., Holmes, B.J., and Kelley, C.M. 2005. National Consumer Health Privacy Survey. California HealthCare Foundation, Oakland, CA.
7. Buhr, G.T., Kuchibhatia, M., and Clipp, E.C. 2005. Caregivers' reasons for nursing home placement: clues for improving discussions with families prior to the transition. The Gerontologist, 46, 1 (Aug. 2005), 52-61.
8. Cahill, E., Lewis, L.M., Barg, F.K., and Bogner, H.R. 2009. "You don't want to burden them": older adults' views on family involvement in care. Journal of Family Nursing, 15, 3 (Aug. 2009), 295-317.
9. Caine, K.E. 2009. Visual sensing devices in home-care systems. In Proceedings of the Security and Privacy in Medical and Home Care Systems Workshop (Chicago, IL, November 13, 2009).
10. Caine, K.E., Fisk, A.D., and Rogers, W.A. 2006. Benefits and privacy concerns of a home equipped with a visual sensing system: a perspective from older adults. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (San Francisco, CA, October 16-20, 2006).
11. Caine, K.E., Fisk, A.D., and Rogers, W.A. 2007. Designing privacy conscious aware homes for older adults. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Baltimore, MD, October 1-5, 2007).
12. Camp, L.J., and Connelly, K. 2007. Systematic Design for Privacy in Ubicomp. In Digital Privacy: Theory, Technologies and Practices, A. Acquisti, S. De Capitani di Vimercati, S. Gritzalis, and C. Lambrinoudakis, Taylor & Frances, New York, NY, 327-343.
13. Consolvo, S., Smith, I.E., Matthews, T., LaMarca, A.,Tabert, J., and Powledge, P. 2005. Location disclosure to social relations: why, when, & what people want to share. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, OR, April 2-7, 2005).
14. Crowley, J., Coutaz, J., and Berard, F. 2001. Perceptual user interfaces: things that see. Communications of the ACM, 43, 3 (Mar. 2000), 54-64.
15. Dawes, C., Phillips, C.D., Rose, M., Holan, S., and Sherman, M. 2002. A national survey of assisted living facilities. The Gerontologist, 43, 6 (Oct. 2003), 875-882.
16. Edwards,W. K., and Grinter, R. At home with ubiquitous computing: seven challenges. In Proceedings of the Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Seoul, South Korea, September 21-24, 2008).
17. Ethical Technology in the Homes of Seniors. Retrieved Mar 1, 2010. http://ethos.indiana.edu
18. nd Ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
19. Ganguli, M., Seaberg, E., Belle, S., Fischer, L., and Kuller, L.H. 1993. Cognitive impairment and the use of health services in an elderly rural population: the MoVIES project. Monongahela Valley elders survey. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 41, 10 (Oct. 1993), 1065-1070.
20. Guralnik, J.M., Alecxih, L., Branch, L.G., and Wiener, J.M. 2002. Medical and long-term care costs when older persons become more dependent. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 8 (Aug 2002), 1244-1245.
21. Kumaraguru, P., and Cranor, L. 2005. Privacy indexes: a survey of Westin's studies. Institute for Software Research International (ISRI), Carnegie Mellon University. Retrieved June 1, 2010. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ponguru/CMU- ISRI-05-138.pdf
22. Lederer, S., Mankoff, J., and Dey, A.K. 2003. Who wants to know what when? Privacy preference determinants in ubiquitous computing. In Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, FL, April 5-10, 2003).
23. Lorenzen-Huber, L., Boutain, M., Shankar, K., Camp, L.J., and Connelly, K. 2010. Privacy, independence, and relationships: older adults' perceptions of home-based ubiquitous technologies. Ageing International.
24. Mui, A., and Burnette, D. 1994. A comparative profile of frail elderly persons living alone and those living with others. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 21, 3 & 4 (Aug. 1994), 5-26.
25. Mutschler, P.H. 1997. The effects of income on home modification: can they afford to stay put? In Staying Put: Adapting the Places Instead of the People, S. Lanspery, and J. Hyde, Eds. Baywood Publishing Company, Inc., Amityville, NY, 149-168.
26. Neustaedter, C., Greenberg, S., and Boyle, M. 2006. Blur filtration fails to preserve privacy for home-based video conferencing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interactions, 13, 1 (Mar 2006), 1-36.
27. Olson, J.S., Grudin, J., and Horvitz, E. 2005. A study of preferences for sharing and privacy. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, OR, April 2-7, 2005).
28. Pynoos, J. & Regnier, V. 1997. Design directives in home adaptation. In Staying Put: Adapting the Places Instead of the People, S. Lanspery, and J. Hyde, Eds. Baywood Publishing Company, Inc., Amityville, NY, 41-54.
29. Ross, P.E. 2004. Managing care through the air. IEEE Spectrum (Dec. 2004), 26-31.
30. Stead, W.W., and Lin, H.S. 2009. Computational technology for effective health care: Immediate steps and strategic directions. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. Retrieved Mar 3, 2010. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/reports/ comptech-prepub.pdf
31. Tsai, J.Y., Kelley, P., Drielsma, P., Cranor, L.F., Hong, J., and Sadeh, N. 2009. Who's viewed you? The impact of feedback in a mobile location-sharing application. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, April 4-9, 2009).
32. Warren, S.D., and Brandeis, L. 1890. The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review 193, 193-220.
33. Zarsky, T.Z. 2003. Thinking outside the box: considering transparency, anonymity, and pseudonymity as overall solutions to the problems in information privacy in the internet society. University of Miami Law Review 58, 991-1044.