A comparative study of a hybrid logit-Fratar and neural network models for trip distribution: Case of the city of Isfahan

Journal of Advanced Transportation

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 80-93

  Shir Mohammadli, M ^a   Shetab Bushehri, S N ^a   Poorzahedy, H ^b   Hejazi, S R ^a  

^a ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Fratar model; Hybrid Logit Fratar; Logit model; Neural network; Trip distribution

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDIES; FRATAR MODEL; HYBRID LOGIT-FRATAR; HYBRID MODEL; LOGIT MODELS; NEURAL NETWORK MODEL; TRIP DISTRIBUTION;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 78650913845     PISSN: 01976729     EISSN: 20423195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/atr.143     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ortuzar JD, Willumsen LG,. Modelling Transport, 2nd edn, John Wiley and Sons Ltd Inc.: NY, 1994.
2. Boyce D, Xiong C,. Forecasting travel for very large cities: challenges and opportunities for China. Transportmetrica 2007; 3 (1): 1-19.
3. Reggiani A, Nijkamp P, Tsang WF,. Models and scenarios for European freight transport based on neural networks and logit analysis. Available at, Vrije Universities: Amsterdam, 1997.
4. Fischer MM, Lunge Y,. A Genetic-algorithms Based Evolutionary Computational Neural Network for Modeling Spatial Interaction Data, Vol. 32, Regional Science: Springer-Verlag, 1998; 437-458.
5. Subba Rao PV, Sikdar PK, Krishna RAO KV, Dhingra SL,. Another insight into artificial neural networks through behavioral analysis of access mode choice. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 1998; 22 (5): 485-496.
6. Mozolin M, Thill JC, Usery EL,. Trip distribution forecasting with multilayer perceptron neural networks: a critical evaluation. Transportation Research Part B 2000; 34: 53-74.
7. Rggiani P, Nijkamp E, Sabella A,. New Advances in Spatial Network Modeling: Towards Evolutionary Algorithms, New Analytical Advances in Transportation and Spatial Dynamics. 2001; 89-133.
8. Nijkamp P, Reggiani A, Tsang WF,. Comparative modeling of interregional transport flows: applications to multimodal European freight transport. European Journal of Operational Research 2004; 155 (3): 584-602.
9. Cantarella GE, de Luca S,. Nested logit models vs. artificial neural network for simulation mode choice behavior. In 4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis 2003; 84-90.
10. Cantarella GE, de Luca S,. Multilayer feed forward networks for transportation mode choice analysis: an analysis and a comparison with random utility models. Transport Research Part C 2005a; 13 (2): 121-155.
11. Cantarella GE, de Luca S,. Modeling transportation mode choice through utility-based MLFFN. In Applied Research in: Uncertainly Modeling and Analysis, Attoh-Okine NO, Bilal MA, (eds). Springer: US, 2005b; pp. 341-368.
12. Celikoglu HB,. Public transportation trip flow modeling with generalized regression neural networks. Advances in Engineering Software 2007; 38: 71-79.
13. Cascetta E, Russo F,. Calibrating aggregate travel demand models with traffic counts: estimators and statistical performance. Transportation 1997; 24 (3): 271-293.
14. Tamin OZ, Sulistyorini R,. Public Transport Demand Estimation by Calibrating the Combined Trip Distribution-Mode Choice (TDMC) Model From Passenger Counts. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 2009; 54: 405-411.
15. Feng XS, Zhang JY, Fujiwara A,. Analysis of feedback to obtain steady-state solutions in four-step modeling. Transportmetrica 2009; 5 (3): 215-227.
16. Khisty CJ,. Transportation Engineering: An Introduction. Prentice-Hall: NJ, 1990.
17. Nguyen S,. Estimating origin-destination matrices from observed flows. In Transportation Planning Models, Florian, M. (ed.). North-Holland: Amesterdam, 1984.
18. Heanue KE, Pyers CE,. A comparative evaluation of trip distribution procedures, 1966.
19. McFadden D,. Disaggregate behavioral travel demand's RUM side a 30-year retrospective, 1965.
20. McFadden D,. Quantitative methods for analyzing travel behavior of individuals: some recent developments. Working Paper No. 7704, Urban Travel Demand Forecasting Project. UC California: Berkeley, 1977.
21. McFadden D,. Modeling the Choice of Residential Location,. In, Karlquist A, handquist h, Snikars F, Weiball JW, (eds). Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models. North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1978.
22. Coslett SR,. Efficient estimation of discrete choice models. In Structural Analysis of Discrete Data: With Econometric Applications, CF, Manski, D McFadden, (eds). The MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass, 1981.
23. Wilson AG,. The use of entropy maximizing models in the theory of trip distribution, modal split, and route split. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 1969; 3: 108-126.
24. Wilson AG,. A statistical theory of spatial models. Transport Research Part C 1967; 1: 253-269.
25. Sheffi Y,. Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods. Prentice-Hall, Inc.: NJ, 1985.
26. Gauss for Windows. Kernel Rev. 9.0.0, build 1108, Aptech Systems Inc., Techplot Edge Visualization Software, Bellevue, Washington, USA, 2004.
27. Tortum A, Yayla N, GökdaÄ M,. The modeling of mode choices of intercity freight transportation with the artificial neural networks and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Expert Systems with Applications 2009; 36 (3, Part 2): 6199-6217.
28. Mohammadian A, Miller EJ,. Nested logit models and artificial neural networks for predicting household automobile choices: comparison of performance. Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Record. 2007; 1807: 92-100.