Quantitative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 277-286

  Shum, Judy ^a   Martufi, Giampaolo ^b   Di Martino, Elena ^c   Washington, Christopher B ^d   Grisafi, Joseph ^d   Muluk, Satish C ^d   Finol, Ender A ^a,e  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^d ALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Geometry quantification; Machine learning; Rupture risk; Wall thickness

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS; CLINICAL MANAGEMENT; COMPLEX SHAPES; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST-ENHANCED; CROSS VALIDATION; DATA SETS; DECISION-TREE ALGORITHM; EXPANSION RATE; FEATURE SELECTION; IMAGE-BASED; MACHINE-LEARNING; NON-INVASIVE; PREDICTION ACCURACY; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENTS; REGIONAL VARIATION; RUPTURE RISK; SEGMENTATION ALGORITHMS; SHAPE AND SIZE; SURFACE AREA; SURFACE CURVATURES; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODEL; WALL THICKNESS;

ALGORITHMS; BLOOD VESSELS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DECISION TREES; FEATURE EXTRACTION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; RATING; WALLS (STRUCTURAL PARTITIONS);

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ABDOMINAL AORTA; ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AORTA RUPTURE; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY;

AORTA, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC RUPTURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR;

EID: 78650871050     PISSN: 00906964     EISSN: 15739686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-010-0175-3     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. PG Batchelor AD Castellano Smith DLG Hill 1999 Proper scales of shapes-a curved scale space LNCS 1682 375 385
2. PG Batchelor AD Castellano Smith DL Hill DJ Hawkes TC Cox AF Dean 2002 Measures of folding applied to the development of the human fetal brain IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21 953 965 10.1109/TMI.2002.803108 12472268 (Pubitemid 35476599)
3. M Belkin MC Donaldson AD Whittemore 1994 Abdominal aortic aneurysms Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 9 581 590 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FnvVCqtQ%3D%3D 10.1097/00001573- 199409000-00013 7987038
4. ES Di Martino A Bohra JP Vande Geest N Gupta M Makaroun DA Vorp 2006 Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue J. Vasc. Surg. 43 570 576 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.072 16520175 (Pubitemid 43332745)
5. BJ Doyle A Callanan PE Burke PA Grace MT Walsh DA Vorp, et al. 2009 Vessel asymmetry as an additional diagnostic tool in the assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms J. Vasc. Surg. 49 443 454 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.064 19028061
6. MF Fillinger SP Marra ML Raghavan FE Kennedy 2003 Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter J. Vasc. Surg. 37 724 732 10.1067/mva.2003.213 12663969 (Pubitemid 36373356)
7. MF Fillinger J Racusin RK Baker JL Cronenwett A Teutelink ML Schermerhorn, et al. 2004 Anatomic characteristics of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm on conventional CT scans: implications for rupture risk J. Vasc. Surg. 39 1243 1252 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.02.025 15192565 (Pubitemid 38952593)
8. MF Fillinger ML Raghavan SP Marra JL Cronenwett FE Kennedy 2002 In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk J. Vasc. Surg. 36 589 597 10.1067/mva.2002.125478 12218986
9. G Giannoglou G Giannakoulas J Soulis Y Chatzizisis T Perdikides N Melas, et al. 2006 Predicting the risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms by utilizing various geometrical parameters: revisiting the diameter criterion Angiology 57 487 494 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28rpt1Wiug%3D%3D 10.1177/0003319706290741 17022385 (Pubitemid 44449048)
10. RM Greenhalgh LC Brown GP Kwong JT Powell SG Thompson 2004 Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial Lancet 364 843 848 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cvkvFShug%3D%3D 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16979-1 15351191 (Pubitemid 39221061)
11. WA Grobman DM Stamilio 2006 Methods of clinical prediction Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 194 888 894 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.09.002 16522430 (Pubitemid 43333171)
12. M Hall E Frank G Holmes B Pfahringer P Reutemann IH Witten 2009 The WEKA data mining software: an update SIGKDD Explor. 11 10 18 10.1145/1656274.1656278
13. FA Lederle SE Wilson GR Johnson DB Reinke FN Littooy, et al. 2002 Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms N. Engl. J. Med. 346 1437 1444 10.1056/NEJMoa012573 12000813 (Pubitemid 34755711)
14. B Ma RE Harbaugh ML Raghavan 2004 Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of cerebral aneurysms Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32 264 273 10.1023/B:ABME.0000012746.31343.92 15008374
15. Maier, A., M. W. Gee, C. Reeps, J. Pongratz, H. H. Eckstein, and W. A. Wall. A comparison of diameter, wall stress, and rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38:3124-3134, 2010.
16. G Martufi ES Di Martino CH Amon SC Muluk EA Finol 2009 Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of abdominal aortic aneurysms: image-based wall thickness distribution J. Biomech. Eng. 131 6 061015 10.1115/1.3127256 19449969
17. TM McGloughlin BJ Doyle 2010 New approaches to abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk assessment: engineering insights with clinical gain Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 30 1687 1694 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtVCnsb3N 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.204529 20508202
18. W Mower L Baraff J Sneyd 1993 Stress distribution in vascular aneurysms: factors affecting risk of aneurysm rupture J. Surg. Res. 55 155 161 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FhslKrtg%3D%3D 10.1006/jsre.1993.1123 8412094 (Pubitemid 23335791)
19. Nyilas, R. D., S. M. L. Ng, J. Leung, and X. Y. Xu. Towards a new geometric approach to assess the risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms using patient specific modeling. In: Abstract SBC2005-I21 of Proceedings of the 2005 Summer Bioengineering Conference.
20. S Pappu A Dardik H Tagare RJ Gusberg 2008 Beyond fusiform and saccular: a novel quantitative tortuosity index may help classify aneurysm shape and predict aneurysm rupture potential Ann. Vasc. Surg. 22 88 97 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.09.004 18023556
21. P Peduzzi J Concato E Kemper TR Holford AR Feinstein 1996 A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis J. Clin. Epidemiol. 49 1373 1379 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7isFCjug%3D%3D 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3 8970487 (Pubitemid 27028925)
22. PO Persson G Strang 2004 A simple mesh generator in MATLAB SIAM Rev. 46 329 345 10.1137/S0036144503429121
23. ML Raghavan B Ma RE Harbaugh 2005 Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk J. Neurosurg. 102 355 362 10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0355 15739566
24. MS Sacks DA Vorp ML Raghavan MP Federle MW Webster 1999 In vivo three-dimensional surface geometry of abdominal aortic aneurysms Ann. Biomed. Eng. 27 469 479 1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzps1ejtQ%3D%3D 10.1114/1.202 10468231
25. CM Scotti EA Finol 2007 Compliant biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a fluid-structure interaction study Comput. Struct. 85 1097 1113 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.08.041 (Pubitemid 46719326)
26. CM Scotti J Jimenez SC Muluk EA Finol 2008 Wall stress and flow dynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms: finite element analysis vs. fluid-structure interaction Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 11 301 322 10.1080/10255840701827412
27. CM Scotti AD Shkolnik SC Muluk EA Finol 2005 Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness Biomed. Eng. Online 4 64 10.1186/1475-925X-4-64 16271141 (Pubitemid 41645658)
28. J Shum ES Di Martino A Goldhammer D Goldman L Acker G Patel, et al. 2010 Semi-automatic vessel wall detection and quantification of wall thickness in ct images of human abdominal aortic aneurysms Med. Phys. 37 638 648 10.1118/1.3284976 20229873
29. Shum J, A. Xu, I. Chatnuntawech, and E. A. Finol. An automated methodology for surface mesh generation of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann. Biomed. Eng. doi: 10.1007/s10439-010-0165-5.
30. Somkantha, K., and P. Phuangsuwan. Diagnosis of the abdominal aorta aneurysm in magnetic resonance imaging images. In: International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT2009), Tokyo, Japan.
31. Taubin, G. Signal processing approach to fair surface design. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, CA, 9-11 August. New York: ACM, 1995.
32. M Truijers JA Pol LJ Schultzekool SM van Sterkenburg MF Fillinger JD Blankensteijn 2007 Wall stress analysis in small asymptomatic, symptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 33 401 407 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s7ksFegug%3D%3D 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.10.009 17137809 (Pubitemid 46336587)
33. GR Upchurch Jr TA Schaub 2006 Abdominal aortic aneurysm Am. Fam. Physician 73 1198 1204 16623206
34. JP Vande Geest ES Di Martino A Bohra MS Makaroun DA Vorp 2006 A biomechanics-based rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm risk assessment: demonstrative application Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1085 11 21 10.1196/annals.1383.046 (Pubitemid 47092017)
35. AK Venkatasubramaniam MJ Fagan T Mehta KJ Mylankal B Ray G Kuhan, et al. 2004 A comparative study of aortic wall stress using finite element analysis for ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 28 168 176 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2czjt1GktQ%3D%3D 15234698