Use of cloth-media filter for membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 102, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 2193-2198

  Zahid, Waleed M ^a,b   El Shafai, Saber A ^a,b  

^a KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Cake layer; Cloth media; Hydrophilic; MBR; Membrane fouling

Indexed keywords

CAKE LAYER; CLOTH-MEDIA; EGYPTIANS; FILTER MEDIA; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; HYDROPHILIC; LOADING RATE; MBR; MEDIA FILTERS; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; MUNICIPAL WASTEWATERS; PHOSPHOROUS REMOVAL; SOLID RETENTION TIME; TEXTILE MATERIALS; TOTAL AMMONIA NITROGENS; TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGENS; TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS; TREATED EFFLUENT;

ASTATINE; BIOLOGICAL WATER TREATMENT; BIOREACTORS; EFFLUENTS; HYDROPHILICITY; IRRIGATION; MEMBRANE FOULING; OXYGEN; PHOSPHORUS; TURBIDITY; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND;

ACRYLIC ACID; AMMONIA; NITROGEN; NYLON; PHOSPHORUS; POLYESTER;

BIOFOULING; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; FILTER; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; MEMBRANE; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; PHOSPHORUS; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; RECYCLING; RETENTION; STANDARD (REGULATION); SUSPENDED LOAD; TEXTILE INDUSTRY; TURBIDITY; WASTEWATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; EFFLUENT; EGYPT; FECAL COLIFORM; LIQUID; MEMBRANE REACTOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAUDI ARABIA; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER; TEXTILE; TURBIDITY; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

BACTERIA, AEROBIC; BIOREACTORS; CITIES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; MATERIALS TESTING; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; OXYGEN; TEXTILES; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER POLLUTANTS; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 78650841386     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.116     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. APHA (American Public Health Association), 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington.
2. Blšt'áková A., Bodík I., Dančová L., Jakubčová Z. Domestic wastewater treatment with membrane filtration-two years experience. Desalination 2009, 240:160-169.
3. Bouhabila E., Aïm R.B., Buisson H. Fouling characterization in membrane bioreactors. Separation and Purification Technology 2001, 22-23:123-132.
4. Choi J.G., Bae T.H., Kim J.H., Tak T.M., Randall A.A. The behavior of membrane fouling initiation on the crossflow membrane bioreactor system. Journal of Membrane Science 2002, 203(1-2):103-113.
5. Choi J.-H., Park S.-K., Ng H.-Y. Membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor using track-etched and phase-inversed porous membranes. Separation and Purification Technology 2009, 65:184-192.
6. Chu L., Zhang X., Yang F., Li X. Treatment of domestic wastewater by using a microaerobic membrane bioreactor. Desalination 2006, 189:181-192.
7. Defrance L., Jaffrin M.Y., Gupta B., Paullier P., Geaugey V. Contribution of various constituents of activated sludge to membrane bioreactor fouling. Bioresource Technology 2000, 73:105-112.
8. Egyptian Code ECP 501-2005, 2005. Egyptian standards for reuse of the treated sewage in agriculture.
9. Guo W., Vigneswaran S., Ngo H.-H., Xing W., Goteti P. Comparison of the performance of submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) and submerged membrane adsorption bioreactor (SMABR). Bioresource Technology 2008, 99:1012-1017.
10. Hasar H., Kinaci C., Ünlü A., Toĝrul H., Ipek U. Rheological properties of activated sludge in a SMBR. Biochemical Engineering Journal 2004, 20:1-6.
11. Holler S., Trösch W. Treatment of urban wastewater in a membrane bioreactor at high organic loading rates. Journal of Biotechnology 2001, 92:95-101.
12. Jang N., Shon H., Ren X., Vigneswaran S., Kim I.S. Characteristics of bio-foulants in the membrane bioreactor. Desalination 2006, 200:201-202.
13. Juang L.-C., Tseng D.-H., Lin H.-Y. Membrane processes for water reuse from the effluent of industrial park wastewater treatment plant: a study on flux and fouling of membrane. Desalination 2007, 202:302-309.
14. Kang S., Lee W., Chae S., Shind H. Positive roles of biofilm during the operation of membrane bioreactor for water reuse. Desalination 2007, 202:129-134.
15. Khongnakorn W., Wisniewski C., Pottier L., Vachoud L. Physical properties of activated sludge in a submerged membrane bioreactor and relation with membrane fouling. Separation and Purification Technology 2007, 55:125-131.
16. Lebegue J., Heran M., Grasmick A. MBR functioning under steady and unsteady state conditions. Impact on performances and membrane fouling dynamics. Desalination 2008, 231:209-218.
17. Lei J., Zhou J. Influence of aeration on microbial polymers and membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors. Journal of Membrane Science 2005, 276(1-2):168-177.
18. Liu H., Yang C., Pu W., Zhang J. Removal of nitrogen from wastewater for reusing to boiler feed-water by an anaerobic/aerobic/membrane bioreactor. Chemical Engineering Journal 2008, 140:122-129.
19. Ma H., Bowman C., Davis R. Membrane fouling reduction by backpulsing and surface modification. Journal of Membrane Science 2000, 173(2):191-200.
20. Ma H., Hakim L., Bowman C., Davis R. Factors affecting membrane fouling reduction by surface modification and backpulsing. Journal of Membrane Science 2001, 189(2):255-270.
21. Massé A., Spérandio M., Cabassud C. Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time. Water Research 2006, 40:2405-2415.
22. Meng F., Chae S., Drews A., Kraume M., Shin H., Yang F. Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Research 2009, 43:1489-1512.
23. Metcalf, Eddy, Inc., 2003. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, fourth ed. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Washington, New York, USA. p. 1771.
24. Ministerial decree no 304/3, 2006 for establishment of National Saudi standards for reuse of the treated sewage in agriculture irrigation, Ministry of Water and Electricity, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
25. Rojas M.E.M., Van Kaam R., Schetrite S., Albasi C. Role and variations of supernatant compounds in submerged membrane bioreactor fouling. Desalination 2005, 179:95-107.
26. Scholz W., Fuchs W. Treatment of oil contaminated wastewater in a membrane bioreactor. Water Research 2000, 34(14):3621-3629.
27. Shim J.K., Yoo I.-K., Lee Y.M. Design and operation considerations for wastewater treatment using a flat submerged membrane bioreactor. Process Biochemistry 2002, 38:279-/285.
28. Shui-li Y., Fang-bo Z., Xiao-hui Z., Guo-lin J., Xiang-hua Z. Effect of components in activated sludge liquor on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Journal of Environmental Science 2005, 18(5):897-902.
29. Tazi-Pain A., Schrotter J.C., Bord G., Payreaudeau M., Buisson H. Recent improvement of the BIOSEP(R) process for industrial and municipal wastewater treatment. Desalination 2002, 146(1-3):439-443.
30. Trussell R.S., Merlo R.P., Hermanowicz S.W., Jenkins D. The effect of organic loading on process performance and membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater. Water Research 2006, 40:2675-2683.
31. Xu N., Xing W., Xu N., Shi J. Study on ceramic membrane bioreactor with turbulence promoter. Separation and Purification Technology 2003, 32:403-410.
32. Yang S., Yang F., Fu Z., Lei R. Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on organic carbon and nitrogen removal. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100:2369-2374.
33. Yildiz E., Keskinler B., Pekdemir T., Akay G., Nuhoĝlua A. High strength wastewater treatment in a jet loop membrane bioreactor: kinetics and performance evaluation. Chemical Engineering Science 2005, 60:1103-1116.
34. Zhang S., Qu Y., Liu Y., Yang F., Zhang X., Furukawa K., Yamada Y. Experimental study of domestic sewage treatment with a metal membrane bioreactor. Desalination 2005, 177:83-93.
35. Zhang H., Wang X., Xiao J., Yang F., Zhang J. Enhanced biological nutrient removal using MUCT-MBR system. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100:1048-1054.