Moving dipoles method detects displacement in N2 and P3 generation in diffuse axonal injury patients

2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC'10

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 3265-3268

  Molteni, Erika ^a   Gatti, Eleonora ^a   Bianchi, Anna M ^a   Cerutti, Sergio ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; BRAIN INJURY; CENTRAL SOURCE; CONTROL GROUPS; DIFFUSE AXONAL INJURY; ERROR RATE; GROUP DIFFERENCES; NEURAL MECHANISMS; PERFORMANCE TESTS; REACTION TIME;

PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION RATES;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFUSE AXONAL INJURY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVALUATION STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIFFUSE AXONAL INJURY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 78650831055     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627223     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, Cohen JD. Stimulus modality, perceptual overlap, and the go/no-go N2. Psychophysiology 2004;41(1):157-160
2. Azizian A, Freitas AL, Watson TD, Squires NK. Electrophysiological correlates of categorization: P300 amplitude as index of target similarity. Biol Psychol 2005; 71 (3): 278-288.
3. Clark CR, O'Hanlon AP, Wright MJ, Geffen GM. Event-related potential measurement of deficits in information processing following moderate to severe closed head injury. Brain Inj 1992; 6(6): 509-520.
4. Lew HL, Poole JH, Castaneda A, Salerno RM, Gray M. Prognostic value of evoked and event-related potentials in moderate to severe brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2006; 21 (4): 350-60.
5. Conners C.K., Conners' Continuous Performance test. Version 3.0. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems 1994
6. De Munck, J.C. The estimation of time varying dipoles on the basis of evoked potentials. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.,1990,77:156-60
7. Baillet, S., Mosher, J.C. and Leahy, R.M. Electromagnetic brain mapping, IEEE Sig. Proc. Mag., November 2001, 18(6): 14-30.
8. Tombaugh TN, Rees L, Stormer P, Harrison AG, Smith A. The effects of mild and severe traumatic brain injury on speed of information processing. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2007; 22 (1): 25-36.
9. Cremona-Meteyard SL, Geffen GM. Event-related potential indices of visual attention following moderate to severe closed head injury. Brain Inj 1994; 8 (6): 541-58.
10. Yamazaki T., Kamijo K., Kenmochi A., Fukuzumi S., Kiyuna T. Takakh Y., and Kuroiwa Y. Multiple Equivalent Current Dipole Source Localization of Visual Event-Related Potentials During Oddball Paradigm With Motor Response. Brain Topography, Volume 12, Number 3 pp.: 159-75 (2000).
11. E. S. Mikhailova, et al. Trajectories of Shifting Dipole Sources of Visual Evoked Potentials Across the Human Brain Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, Vol. 38, No. 9, pagg. 1001-9 (2008)
12. Mecklinger, A., Maess, B., Opitz, B., Pfeifer, E., Cheyne, D. and Weinberg, H. A MEG analysis of the P300 in visual discrimination tasks. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1998,108: 45-56.
13. Azouvi P, Vallat-Azouvi C, Belmont A. Cognitive deficits after traumatic coma. Prog Brain Res. 2009;177:89-110.