Perturbation-based measurement of real and imaginary parts of human arm's mechanical impedance

2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC'10

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 5911-5914

  Hondori, Hossein Mousavi ^a   Ling, Shih Fu ^b,c  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^c Department of the School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering ^*  (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEMS; COMPLEX NUMBER; CONTROL VARIABLE; FREQUENCY INDEPENDENT; HUMAN ARM; IMAGINARY PARTS; MECHANICAL IMPEDANCES; REAL PART; SIMULATION RESULT; SINUSOIDAL PERTURBATIONS;

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES;

ARM; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BODY POSTURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HAND; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ARM; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HAND; HUMANS; POSTURE;

EID: 78650830644     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627544     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S., 1975. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 7(1):13-31
2. Palazzolo JJ, Ferraro M, Krebs HI, Lynch D, Volpe BT, and Hogan N, 2007. Stochastic Estimation of Arm Mechanical Impedance During Robotic Stroke Rehabilitation. IEEE Transaction on Neural System and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 15, no. 1
3. Palazzolo, Jerome J. 2005. Performance-Based Progressive Therapy (PBPT) Enhances Neural PlasticitySpectral Estimation of Mechanical Impedance of Hemiplegic Arms. PhD Thesis, Departement of Mechanical Engineering, MIT
4. S H Brown and J D Cooke,1981. Amplitude- and instructiondependent modulation of movement-related electromyogram activity in humans, J Physiol. 1981 July; 316: 97-107.
5. M Hallett, B T Shahani and R R Young (1975) EMG analysis of stereotyped voluntary movements in man, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 1975, 38, 1154-1162.
6. Rothwell JC, Traub MM, Day BL, Obeso JA, Thomas PK, Marsden CD, 1982. Manual motor performance in a deafferented man, Brain. 1982 Sep; 105 (Pt 3):515-42.
7. S. H. Brown and J. D. Cooke (1990) Movement-related phasic muscle activation. I. Relations with temporal profile of movement, Journal of Neurophysiology. 1990; Vol 63, Issue 3 455-464
8. Hannaford B, Stark L, 1985. Roles of the elements of the triphasic control signal, Exp Neurol. 1985 Dec;90(3):619-34
9. Darling WG, Cooke WG (1987) Movement related EMGs become more variable during learning of fast accurate movements, J Mot Behav. 1987 Sep;19(3):311-31
10. Hogan N (1984) Adaptive Control of Mechanical Impedance by Coactivation of Antagonist Muscles, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. AC-29, NO. 8, AUGUST 1984
11. Mousavi Hondori H., Ling S-F, Khosrowabadi R, 2010. Muscles' Coactivation in a Stationary Limb Alters According to the Movement of Other Limb. 3rd Internation Conference Biomedical Electronics and Devices, BIODEVICES 2010.
12. E Burdet, R Osu, DW Franklin, TE Milner, M Kawato (2001), The CNS Skillfully Stabilizes Unstable Dynamics by Learning Optimal Impedance. Nature 414: 446-9
13. Darainy M., Ostry D., 2008. Muscle cocontraction following dynamics learning. Exp Brain Res 190:153-163
14. Harris CM, Wolpert DM, 1998. Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394: 780-784
15. Luc P. J. Selen, David W. Franklin, and Daniel M. Wolpert, 2009. Impedance Control Reduces Instability That Arises from Motor Noise. The Journal of Neuroscience, October 7, 2009 29(40):12606-12616
16. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific & Technical Terms, 6E, 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc
17. McGraw-Hill Concise Encyclopedia of Physics. 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
18. Ling S-F, Fu L, 2004. Apparatus for Sensor-less Monitoring and Diagnosis of Motor Driven Mechanical Systems. US Patent pending, No. 60/551336, through NTU, 1 March
19. Mousavi Hondori H., Ling S-F, 2009. A Method for Measuring Human Arm's Mechanical Impedance for Assessment of Motor Rehabilitation. 3rdInternation Convention on Rehabilitation and Assisstance Technology, i-CREATe
20. Mousavi Hondori H., Ling S-F, 2010. A Novel Device for Measuring Mechanical Impedance during Dynamic Tasks. 3rd Internation Conference Biomedical Electronics and Devices, BIODEVICES 2010.
21. Mousavi Hondori H, Ling S-F, Measuring human arm's mechanical impedance while adapting a reaching task, manuscript submitted for publication to Measurement, Journal of the International Measurement Confederation
22. Kuo Y.L., Lin J.Y. and Lee Y.N., 2009. Motion conditions justification of an omni-directional mobile platform by electromechanical transduction matrix, Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 2009; 31; 167
23. Mussa-Ivaldi, F.A., Hogan, N., Bizzi, E. (1985) Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans. Journal of Neuroscience 5, 2732-2743.
24. Kirsch RF, Boskov D and Rymer WZ, 1994. Muscle Stiffness During Transient and Continuous Movements of Cat Muscle: Perturbation Characteristics and Physiological Relevance. IEEE Trans on Biomedical Engineering 41(8): 758-70.