-
1
-
-
44249098047
-
Radical prostatectomy by open or laparoscopic/ robotic techniques: An issue of surgical device or surgical expertise?
-
Blute ML. Radical prostatectomy by open or laparoscopic/ robotic techniques: an issue of surgical device or surgical expertise? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2248-2249.
-
(2008)
J Clin Oncol
, vol.26
, pp. 2248-2249
-
-
Blute, M.L.1
-
2
-
-
68249131038
-
Bowel obstruction following appendectomy: What is the true incidence?
-
Leung TT, Dixon E, Gill M, et al. Bowel obstruction following appendectomy: what is the true incidence? Ann Surg. 2009; 250:51-53.
-
(2009)
Ann Surg
, vol.250
, pp. 51-53
-
-
Leung, T.T.1
Dixon, E.2
Gill, M.3
-
3
-
-
77955655059
-
Meshfixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: A randomized trial of three fixation techniques
-
Wassenaar E, Schoenmaeckers E, Raymakers J, et al. Meshfixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques. Surg Endosc. 2010;24: 1296-1302.
-
(2010)
Surg Endosc
, vol.24
, pp. 1296-1302
-
-
Wassenaar, E.1
Schoenmaeckers, E.2
Raymakers, J.3
-
4
-
-
66749149424
-
Reduced risk of ulcerative colitis after appendicectomy
-
Timmer A, Obermeier F. Reduced risk of ulcerative colitis after appendicectomy. BMJ. 2009;338:b225.
-
(2009)
BMJ
, vol.338
-
-
Timmer, A.1
Obermeier, F.2
-
5
-
-
73949132991
-
Transgastric peritoneoscopy and appendectomy: Thoughts on our first experience in humans
-
Park PO, Bergstrom M. Transgastric peritoneoscopy and appendectomy: thoughts on our first experience in humans. Endoscopy. 2010;42:81-84.
-
(2010)
Endoscopy
, vol.42
, pp. 81-84
-
-
Park, P.O.1
Bergstrom, M.2
-
6
-
-
77952491972
-
Comparison of the clinical and economic outcomes between open and minimally invasive appendectomy and colectomy: Evidence from a large commercial payer database
-
Fullum TM, Ladapo JA, Borah BJ, et al. Comparison of the clinical and economic outcomes between open and minimally invasive appendectomy and colectomy: evidence from a large commercial payer database. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24:845-853.
-
(2010)
Surg Endosc
, vol.24
, pp. 845-853
-
-
Fullum, T.M.1
Ladapo, J.A.2
Borah, B.J.3
-
7
-
-
33746111521
-
Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: A critical review
-
Kapischke M, Caliebe A, Tepel J, et al. Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: a critical review. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1060-1068.
-
(2006)
Surg Endosc
, vol.20
, pp. 1060-1068
-
-
Kapischke, M.1
Caliebe, A.2
Tepel, J.3
-
8
-
-
77952698026
-
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy improves outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledochocystolithiasis
-
Reinders JS, Goud A, Timmer R, et al. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy improves outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledochocystolithiasis. Gastroenterology. 2010; 138:2315-2320.
-
(2010)
Gastroenterology
, vol.138
, pp. 2315-2320
-
-
Reinders, J.S.1
Goud, A.2
Timmer, R.3
-
9
-
-
47049107801
-
Laparoscopy should be the approach of choice for acute appendicitis in the morbidly obese
-
Varela JE, Hinojosa MW, Nguyen NT. Laparoscopy should be the approach of choice for acute appendicitis in the morbidly obese. Am J Surg. 2008;196:218-222.
-
(2008)
Am J Surg
, vol.196
, pp. 218-222
-
-
Varela, J.E.1
Hinojosa, M.W.2
Nguyen, N.T.3
-
10
-
-
38349149295
-
Randomized clinical trial evaluating elective laparoscopic appendicectomy for chronic right lowerquadrant pain
-
Arnold SJ, Nash GF. Randomized clinical trial evaluating elective laparoscopic appendicectomy for chronic right lowerquadrant pain (Br J Surg. 2008;95:169-174).
-
(2008)
Br J Surg
, vol.95
, pp. 169-174
-
-
Arnold, S.J.1
Nash, G.F.2
-
11
-
-
44249097071
-
-
author reply 800-801
-
Br J Surg. 2008; 95:800; author reply 800-801.
-
(2008)
Br J Surg
, vol.95
, pp. 800
-
-
-
12
-
-
64149112774
-
Success and complication parameters for laparoscopic surgery: A benchmark for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery
-
Gutt CN, Muller-Stich BP, Reiter MA. Success and complication parameters for laparoscopic surgery: a benchmark for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Endoscopy. 2009;41:36-41.
-
(2009)
Endoscopy
, vol.41
, pp. 36-41
-
-
Gutt, C.N.1
Muller-Stich, B.P.2
Reiter, M.A.3
-
13
-
-
0027490149
-
Laparoscopic appendicectomy: A prospective analysis
-
Cox MR, McCall JL, Wilson TG, et al. Laparoscopic appendicectomy: a prospective analysis. Aust N Z J Surg. 1993; 63:840-847.
-
(1993)
Aust N Z J Surg
, vol.63
, pp. 840-847
-
-
Cox, M.R.1
McCall, J.L.2
Wilson, T.G.3
-
14
-
-
77953980144
-
Meta-analysis of the therapeutic effect of hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
-
Liu Z, Zhou Y, Zhang P, et al. Meta-analysis of the therapeutic effect of hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20:130-140.
-
(2010)
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech
, vol.20
, pp. 130-140
-
-
Liu, Z.1
Zhou, Y.2
Zhang, P.3
-
15
-
-
0032558314
-
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
-
DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01085-X
-
Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet. 1998;352:609-613. (Pubitemid 28380142)
-
(1998)
Lancet
, vol.352
, Issue.9128
, pp. 609-613
-
-
Moher, D.1
Pham, B.2
Jones, A.3
Cook, D.J.4
Jadad, A.R.5
Moher, M.6
Tugwell, P.7
Klassen, T.P.8
-
16
-
-
0029991929
-
Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men
-
Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg. 1996;20:263-266.
-
(1996)
World J Surg
, vol.20
, pp. 263-266
-
-
Cox, M.R.1
McCall, J.L.2
Toouli, J.3
-
17
-
-
0028222614
-
A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy
-
discussion 728-731
-
Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg. 1994;219:725-728; discussion 728-731.
-
(1994)
Ann Surg
, vol.219
, pp. 725-728
-
-
Frazee, R.C.1
Roberts, J.W.2
Symmonds, R.E.3
-
18
-
-
0030027943
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Prospective randomized trial
-
discussion 21
-
Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg. 1996;20:17-20; discussion 21.
-
(1996)
World J Surg
, vol.20
, pp. 17-20
-
-
Hansen, J.B.1
Smithers, B.M.2
Schache, D.3
-
19
-
-
0032894488
-
Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy
-
Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, et al. Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 1999;86:48-53.
-
(1999)
Br J Surg
, vol.86
, pp. 48-53
-
-
Hellberg, A.1
Rudberg, C.2
Kullman, E.3
-
20
-
-
0034780653
-
Needlescopic, laparoscopic, and open appendectomy: A comparative study
-
Huang MT,Wei PL, Wu CC, et al. Needlescopic, laparoscopic, and open appendectomy: a comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001;11:306-312.
-
(2001)
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech
, vol.11
, pp. 306-312
-
-
Huang, M.T.1
Wei, P.L.2
Wu, C.C.3
-
21
-
-
1542346404
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: What is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial
-
Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:334-337.
-
(2004)
Surg Endosc
, vol.18
, pp. 334-337
-
-
Ignacio, R.C.1
Burke, R.2
Spencer, D.3
-
22
-
-
24944457361
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A prospective randomized doubleblind study
-
discussion 448-450
-
Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized doubleblind study. Ann Surg. 2005;242:439-448; discussion 448-450.
-
(2005)
Ann Surg
, vol.242
, pp. 439-448
-
-
Katkhouda, N.1
Mason, R.J.2
Towfigh, S.3
-
24
-
-
0035072182
-
A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Clinical and economic analyses
-
Long KH, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery. 2001;129:390-400.
-
(2001)
Surgery
, vol.129
, pp. 390-400
-
-
Long, K.H.1
Bannon, M.P.2
Zietlow, S.P.3
-
25
-
-
0030751807
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A prospective randomized trial
-
Macarulla E, Vallet J, Abad JM, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997;7:335-339.
-
(1997)
Surg Laparosc Endosc
, vol.7
, pp. 335-339
-
-
MacArulla, E.1
Vallet, J.2
Abad, J.M.3
-
26
-
-
0029133575
-
Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison
-
discussion 261-262
-
Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL, et al. Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison. Ann Surg. 1995;222:256-261; discussion 261-262.
-
(1995)
Ann Surg
, vol.222
, pp. 256-261
-
-
Martin, L.C.1
Puente, I.2
Sosa, J.L.3
-
27
-
-
15944425083
-
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis
-
Moberg AC, Berndsen F, Palmquist I, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2005;92:298-304.
-
(2005)
Br J Surg
, vol.92
, pp. 298-304
-
-
Moberg, A.C.1
Berndsen, F.2
Palmquist, I.3
-
28
-
-
27644460458
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: A randomized prospective study
-
Olmi S, Magnone S, Bertolini A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1193-1195.
-
(2005)
Surg Endosc
, vol.19
, pp. 1193-1195
-
-
Olmi, S.1
Magnone, S.2
Bertolini, A.3
-
29
-
-
0028843580
-
A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy
-
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group, discussion 212-213
-
Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg. 1995;169:208-212; discussion 212-213.
-
(1995)
Am J Surg
, vol.169
, pp. 208-212
-
-
Ortega, A.E.1
Hunter, J.G.2
Peters, J.H.3
-
30
-
-
0035134135
-
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy
-
Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 2001;88:200-205.
-
(2001)
Br J Surg
, vol.88
, pp. 200-205
-
-
Pedersen, A.G.1
Petersen, O.B.2
Wara, P.3
-
32
-
-
77951278367
-
Laparoscopic transumbilical single-port appendectomy: Initial experience and comparison with threeport appendectomy
-
Lee J, Baek J, Kim W. Laparoscopic transumbilical single-port appendectomy: initial experience and comparison with threeport appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20:100-103.
-
(2010)
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech
, vol.20
, pp. 100-103
-
-
Lee, J.1
Baek, J.2
Kim, W.3
-
33
-
-
77957970473
-
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery as an option for the laparoscopic resection of an urachal fistula: First description of the surgical technique
-
Patrzyk M, Glitsch A, Schreiber A, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery as an option for the laparoscopic resection of an urachal fistula: first description of the surgical technique. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2339-2342.
-
(2010)
Surg Endosc
, vol.24
, pp. 2339-2342
-
-
Patrzyk, M.1
Glitsch, A.2
Schreiber, A.3
-
34
-
-
40749130467
-
Changing trends in surgery for acute appendicitis
-
Paterson HM, Qadan M, de Luca SM, et al. Changing trends in surgery for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2008;95:363-368.
-
(2008)
Br J Surg
, vol.95
, pp. 363-368
-
-
Paterson, H.M.1
Qadan, M.2
De Luca, S.M.3
-
35
-
-
0034810469
-
Virtual reality training leads to faster adaptation to the novel psychomotor restrictions encountered by laparoscopic surgeons
-
Jordan JA, Gallagher AG, McGuigan J, et al. Virtual reality training leads to faster adaptation to the novel psychomotor restrictions encountered by laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:1080-1084.
-
(2001)
Surg Endosc
, vol.15
, pp. 1080-1084
-
-
Jordan, J.A.1
Gallagher, A.G.2
McGuigan, J.3
-
36
-
-
70349768401
-
Validation of laparoscopic surgical skills training outside the operating room: A long road
-
Hogle NJ, Chang L, Strong VE, et al. Validation of laparoscopic surgical skills training outside the operating room: a long road. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1476-1482.
-
(2009)
Surg Endosc
, vol.23
, pp. 1476-1482
-
-
Hogle, N.J.1
Chang, L.2
Strong, V.E.3
-
37
-
-
33746513347
-
Learning curve in human laparoscopic surgery
-
Kumar U, Gill IS. Learning curve in human laparoscopic surgery. Curr Urol Rep. 2006;7:120-124.
-
(2006)
Curr Urol Rep
, vol.7
, pp. 120-124
-
-
Kumar, U.1
Gill, I.S.2
-
38
-
-
57449105886
-
Laparoscopic improves perioperative outcomes of antireflux surgery at US academic centers
-
discussion 993
-
Varela JE, Hinojosa MW, Nguyen NT. Laparoscopic improves perioperative outcomes of antireflux surgery at US academic centers. Am J Surg. 2008;196:989-993; discussion 993.
-
(2008)
Am J Surg
, vol.196
, pp. 989-993
-
-
Varela, J.E.1
Hinojosa, M.W.2
Nguyen, N.T.3
-
39
-
-
58149375109
-
Four hundred laparoscopic myotomies for esophageal achalasia: A single centre experience
-
Zaninotto G, Costantini M, Rizzetto C, et al. Four hundred laparoscopic myotomies for esophageal achalasia: a single centre experience. Ann Surg. 2008;248:986-993.
-
(2008)
Ann Surg
, vol.248
, pp. 986-993
-
-
Zaninotto, G.1
Costantini, M.2
Rizzetto, C.3
-
40
-
-
0842348857
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database
-
Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg. 2004;239:43-52.
-
(2004)
Ann Surg
, vol.239
, pp. 43-52
-
-
Guller, U.1
Hervey, S.2
Purves, H.3
|