-
1
-
-
0020679054
-
Endoscopic appendectomy
-
Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 1983; 15: 59-64.
-
(1983)
Endoscopy
, vol.15
, pp. 59-64
-
-
Semm, K.1
-
2
-
-
0032914799
-
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy
-
Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, Diaz J. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 1999; 177: 250-256.
-
(1999)
Am J Surg
, vol.177
, pp. 250-256
-
-
Chung, R.S.1
Rowland, D.Y.2
Li, P.3
Diaz, J.4
-
3
-
-
0032927742
-
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy
-
Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1999; 9: 17-26.
-
(1999)
Surg Laparosc Endosc
, vol.9
, pp. 17-26
-
-
Garbutt, J.M.1
Soper, N.J.2
Shannon, W.D.3
Botero, A.4
Littenberg, B.5
-
4
-
-
0031945396
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A metaanalysis
-
Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186: 545-553.
-
(1998)
J Am Coll Surg
, vol.186
, pp. 545-553
-
-
Golub, R.1
Siddiqui, F.2
Pohl, D.3
-
5
-
-
0031705734
-
Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy - A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
-
Sauerland S, Lefering R, Holthausen, Neugebauer EAM. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy - a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1998; 383: 289-295.
-
(1998)
Langenbecks Arch Surg
, vol.383
, pp. 289-295
-
-
Sauerland, S.1
Lefering, R.2
Holthausen3
Neugebauer, E.A.M.4
-
6
-
-
0032834926
-
A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis
-
Temple LKF, Litwin DE, McLeod RS. A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 1999; 42: 377-383.
-
(1999)
Can J Surg
, vol.42
, pp. 377-383
-
-
Temple, L.K.F.1
Litwin, D.E.2
McLeod, R.S.3
-
7
-
-
0035134135
-
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy
-
Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 200-205.
-
(2001)
Br J Surg
, vol.88
, pp. 200-205
-
-
Pedersen, A.G.1
Petersen, O.B.2
Wara, P.3
Ronning, H.4
Qvist, N.5
Laurberg, S.6
-
8
-
-
0030751807
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A prospective randomised trial
-
Macarulla E, Vallet J, Abad JM, Hussein H, Fernández E, Nieto B. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomised trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1997; 7: 335-339.
-
(1997)
Surg Laparosc Endosc
, vol.7
, pp. 335-339
-
-
Macarulla, E.1
Vallet, J.2
Abad, J.M.3
Hussein, H.4
Fernández, E.5
Nieto, B.6
-
9
-
-
0031115187
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. A randomized clinical trial
-
Kazemier G, de Zeeuw GR, Lange JF, Hop WCJ, Bonjer HJ. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. A randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 1997; 11: 336-340.
-
(1997)
Surg Endosc
, vol.11
, pp. 336-340
-
-
Kazemier, G.1
De Zeeuw, G.R.2
Lange, J.F.3
Hop, W.C.J.4
Bonjer, H.J.5
-
10
-
-
0032894488
-
Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy
-
Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, Enochsson L, Fenyö G, Graffher H et al. Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 48-53.
-
(1999)
Br J Surg
, vol.86
, pp. 48-53
-
-
Hellberg, A.1
Rudberg, C.2
Kullman, E.3
Enochsson, L.4
Fenyö, G.5
Graffher, H.6
-
11
-
-
0028158919
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: A prospective assessment
-
Lujan Mompean JA, Robles Campos R, Parrilla Paricio P, Soria Aledo V, Garcia Ayllon J. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: a prospective assessment. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 133-135.
-
(1994)
Br J Surg
, vol.81
, pp. 133-135
-
-
Lujan Mompean, J.A.1
Robles Campos, R.2
Parrilla Paricio, P.3
Soria Aledo, V.4
Garcia Ayllon, J.5
-
12
-
-
0035072182
-
A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Clinical and economic analyses
-
Long KH, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP, Helgeson ER, Harmsen WS, Smith CD et al. A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery 2001; 129: 390-400.
-
(2001)
Surgery
, vol.129
, pp. 390-400
-
-
Long, K.H.1
Bannon, M.P.2
Zietlow, S.P.3
Helgeson, E.R.4
Harmsen, W.S.5
Smith, C.D.6
-
13
-
-
0031734484
-
Diagnostic laparoscopy in 1043 patients with suspected acute appendicitis
-
Moberg AC, Ahlberg G, Leijonmarck CE, Montgomery A, Reiertsen O, Rosseland AR et al. Diagnostic laparoscopy in 1043 patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Eur J Surg 1998; 164: 833-840.
-
(1998)
Eur J Surg
, vol.164
, pp. 833-840
-
-
Moberg, A.C.1
Ahlberg, G.2
Leijonmarck, C.E.3
Montgomery, A.4
Reiertsen, O.5
Rosseland, A.R.6
-
14
-
-
0034044380
-
Should an appendix that looks 'normal' be removed at diagnostic laparoscopy for acute iliac fossa pain?
-
Teh SH, O'Ceallaigh S, McKeon JGK, O'Donohoe MK, Tanner WA, Keane FB. Should an appendix that looks 'normal' be removed at diagnostic laparoscopy for acute iliac fossa pain? Eur J Surg 2000; 166: 388-389.
-
(2000)
Eur J Surg
, vol.166
, pp. 388-389
-
-
Teh, S.H.1
O'Ceallaigh, S.2
McKeon, J.G.K.3
O'Donohoe, M.K.4
Tanner, W.A.5
Keane, F.B.6
-
15
-
-
0035133002
-
A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed
-
van den Broek WT, Bijnen AB, de Ruiter P, Gouma DJ. A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 251-254.
-
(2001)
Br J Surg
, vol.88
, pp. 251-254
-
-
Van Den Broek, W.T.1
Bijnen, A.B.2
De Ruiter, P.3
Gouma, D.J.4
-
16
-
-
0032867062
-
Value of diagnostic laparoscopy in fertile women with suspected appendicitis
-
Thorell A, Gröndal S, Schedvins K, Wallin G. Value of diagnostic laparoscopy in fertile women with suspected appendicitis. Eur J Surg 1999; 165: 751-754.
-
(1999)
Eur J Surg
, vol.165
, pp. 751-754
-
-
Thorell, A.1
Gröndal, S.2
Schedvins, K.3
Wallin, G.4
-
17
-
-
0033869213
-
Macroscopic assessment of the appendix at diagnostic laparoscopy is reliable
-
Kraemer M, Ohmann C, Leppert R, Yang Q. Macroscopic assessment of the appendix at diagnostic laparoscopy is reliable. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 625-633.
-
(2000)
Surg Endosc
, vol.14
, pp. 625-633
-
-
Kraemer, M.1
Ohmann, C.2
Leppert, R.3
Yang, Q.4
-
18
-
-
0036019949
-
Postoperative convalecence after inguinal hernia surgery: Prospective randomized multicenter study of laparoscopic versus Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in 1042 patients
-
Berndsen F, Arvidsson D, Enander LK, Leijonmarck CE, Wingren U, Rudberg C et al. Postoperative convalecence after inguinal hernia surgery: prospective randomized multicenter study of laparoscopic versus Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in 1042 patients. Hernia 2002; 6: 56-61.
-
(2002)
Hernia
, vol.6
, pp. 56-61
-
-
Berndsen, F.1
Arvidsson, D.2
Enander, L.K.3
Leijonmarck, C.E.4
Wingren, U.5
Rudberg, C.6
-
20
-
-
0033680451
-
Introducing diagnostic laparoscopy for patients with suspected acute appendicitis
-
Moberg AC, Montgomery A. Introducing diagnostic laparoscopy for patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 942-947.
-
(2000)
Surg Endosc
, vol.14
, pp. 942-947
-
-
Moberg, A.C.1
Montgomery, A.2
-
21
-
-
0035069089
-
Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendectomies and improves diagnosis in fertile women. A randomized study
-
Larsson PG, Henriksson G, Olsson M, Boris J, Ströberg P, Tronstad SE et al. Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendectomies and improves diagnosis in fertile women. A randomized study. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 200-202.
-
(2001)
Surg Endosc
, vol.15
, pp. 200-202
-
-
Larsson, P.G.1
Henriksson, G.2
Olsson, M.3
Boris, J.4
Ströberg, P.5
Tronstad, S.E.6
-
22
-
-
0037706769
-
Should every patient undergoing laparoscopy for clinical diagnosis of appendicitis have an appendicectomy?
-
Navez B, Therasse A. Should every patient undergoing laparoscopy for clinical diagnosis of appendicitis have an appendicectomy? Acta Chir Belg 2003; 103: 87-89.
-
(2003)
Acta Chir Belg
, vol.103
, pp. 87-89
-
-
Navez, B.1
Therasse, A.2
-
23
-
-
0035462822
-
'What you see is not what you get.' a plea to remove a 'normal' appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy
-
Chiarugi M, Buccianti P, Decanini L, Balestri R, Lorenzetti L, Franceschi M et al. 'What you see is not what you get.' A plea to remove a 'normal' appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy. Acta Chir Belg 2001; 101: 243-245.
-
(2001)
Acta Chir Belg
, vol.101
, pp. 243-245
-
-
Chiarugi, M.1
Buccianti, P.2
Decanini, L.3
Balestri, R.4
Lorenzetti, L.5
Franceschi, M.6
-
24
-
-
0035078146
-
Conversion from laparoscopic to open appendectomy: A possible drawback of the laparoscopic technique?
-
Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Enochsson L, Gudbjartson T, Wenner J, Kullman E et al. Conversion from laparoscopic to open appendectomy: a possible drawback of the laparoscopic technique? Eur J Surg 2001; 167: 209-213.
-
(2001)
Eur J Surg
, vol.167
, pp. 209-213
-
-
Hellberg, A.1
Rudberg, C.2
Enochsson, L.3
Gudbjartson, T.4
Wenner, J.5
Kullman, E.6
-
25
-
-
0030027943
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Prospective randomized trial
-
Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, Wall DR, Miller BJ, Menzies BL. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 1996; 20: 17-21.
-
(1996)
World J Surg
, vol.20
, pp. 17-21
-
-
Hansen, J.B.1
Smithers, B.M.2
Schache, D.3
Wall, D.R.4
Miller, B.J.5
Menzies, B.L.6
-
26
-
-
0027324183
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: Prospective randomised trial
-
Tate JJT, Dawson JW, Chung SCS, Lau WY, Li AKC. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 1993; 342: 633-637.
-
(1993)
Lancet
, vol.342
, pp. 633-637
-
-
Tate, J.J.T.1
Dawson, J.W.2
Chung, S.C.S.3
Lau, W.Y.4
Li, A.K.C.5
-
27
-
-
0029789771
-
Laparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: Results of a prospective randomized study
-
Mutter D, Vix M, Bui A, Evrard S, Tassetti V, Breton JF et al. Laparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: results of a prospective randomized study. Surgery 1996; 120: 71-74.
-
(1996)
Surgery
, vol.120
, pp. 71-74
-
-
Mutter, D.1
Vix, M.2
Bui, A.3
Evrard, S.4
Tassetti, V.5
Breton, J.F.6
-
28
-
-
0031066338
-
Laparoscopic appendectomy - Is it worthwhile? a prospective, randomized study in young women
-
Laine S, Rantala A, Gullichsen R, Ovaska J. Laparoscopic appendectomy - is it worthwhile? A prospective, randomized study in young women. Surg Endosc 1997; 11: 95-97.
-
(1997)
Surg Endosc
, vol.11
, pp. 95-97
-
-
Laine, S.1
Rantala, A.2
Gullichsen, R.3
Ovaska, J.4
-
29
-
-
0028222614
-
A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy
-
Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 1994; 219: 725-731.
-
(1994)
Ann Surg
, vol.219
, pp. 725-731
-
-
Frazee, R.C.1
Roberts, J.W.2
Symmonds, R.E.3
Snyder, S.K.4
Hendricks, J.C.5
Smith, R.W.6
-
30
-
-
0028843580
-
A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy
-
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Group
-
Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B. A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Group. Am J Surg 1995; 169: 208-213.
-
(1995)
Am J Surg
, vol.169
, pp. 208-213
-
-
Ortega, A.E.1
Hunter, J.G.2
Peters, J.H.3
Swanstrom, L.L.4
Schirmer, B.5
|