Impact of aircraft sound quality combined with the repetition of aircraft flyovers on annoyance as perceived activity disturbance in a laboratory context

Applied Acoustics

Volumn 72, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 169-176

  Lavandier, Catherine ^a   Barbot, Benoit ^a   Terroir, Jonathan ^a   Schuette, Martin ^b  

^a Laboratoire ESO   (France)

^b LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Activity disturbance; Aircraft noise; Noise annoyance; Performance

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY DISTURBANCE; AIRCRAFT NOISE; DOPPLER; LEARNING EFFECTS; NOISE ANNOYANCE; NOISE ENVIRONMENTS; PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SOUND LEVEL; SOUND QUALITY; TONAL QUALITY; VARIANCE ANALYSIS;

ACOUSTIC NOISE; ACOUSTIC VARIABLES MEASUREMENT; NOISE POLLUTION;

AIRCRAFT;

EID: 78650773280     PISSN: 0003682X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Lambert J, Trindade C, Philipps-Bertin C. Enquête nationale sur les nuisances environnementales des transports. Premiers résultats de l'enquête, Rapport INRETS-LTE 0713 pour l'ADEME; 2007.
2. H.M.E. Miedema, and H. Vos Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise J Acoust Soc Am 104 6 1998 3432 3445
3. B. Barbot, and C. Lavadier Perceptual representation of aircraft sounds Appl Acoust 69 11 2008
4. M. Schütte, U. Müller, S. Sandrock, B. Griefahn, C. Lavandier, and B. Barbot Perceived quality features of aircraft sounds: an analysis of the measurement characteristics of a newly created semantic differential Appl Acoust 70 2009 903 914
5. Barbot B. Caractérisation perceptive des bruits d'avion: influence de la qualité sonore confrontée la répétition des événements sur la gêne fonctionnelle. PhD dissertation, University of Cergy Pontoise; 2008.
6. D. Dubois, C. Guastavino, and M. Raimbault A cognitive approach to soundscapes: using verbal data to access auditory categories Acta Acust Unit Acust 92 6 2006 865 874
7. The International Institute of Noise Control Engineering (I-INCE). A global approach to noise control policy. J Noise Cont Eng 2006;54(5):288-346. < http://www.i-ince.org/data/iince061.pdf>.
8. R. Guski How to forecast community annoyance in planning noisy facilities Noise Health 22 6 2004 59 64
9. Van Kempen EEMM, Van Kamp I. Annoyance from air traffic noise: possible trends in exposure-response relationships. RIVM, report 01/2005 MGO EvK, reference 00265; 2005.
10. P. Brooker Do people react more strongly to aircraft noise today than the past ? Appl Acoust 70 2009 747 752
11. H.M.E. Miedema, and H. Vos Demographic and attitudinal factors that modify annoyance from transportation noise J Acoust Soc Am 105 1999 3336 3344
12. R. Guski Personal and social variables as co-determinants of noise annoyance Noise Health 1 3 1999 45 56
13. C. Dickson A method for time-varying annoyance rating of aircraft noise J Acoust Soc Am 126 1 2009 1 3 Letters to the Editor
14. Berckmans D, Janssens K, Sas P, Desmet W, Van der Auweraer H. A new method for aircraft noise synthesis. In Proceedings of the international conference on noise and vibration engineering. Leuven, Belgium; 2006, p. 4257-70.
15. D. Berckmans, K. Janssens, P. Sas, and W. Desmet Model based synthesis of aircraft noise to quantify the subjective human perception of sound quality and annoyance J Sound Vib 311 3-5 2008 1175 1195
16. Fastl H, Markus F, Simon A. Is the railway bonus influenced by the direction of the sound source? In Proceedings of the CFA/DAGA'04. Strasbourg, France; 2004, p. 745-8.
17. E. Maris, P.J. Stallen, R. Vermunt, and H. Steensma Noise within the social context: annoyance reduction through fair procedures J Acoust Soc Am 121 4 2007 2000 2010
18. E. Maris, P.J. Stallen, R. Vermunt, and H. Steensma Evaluating noise in social context: the effect of procedural unfairness on noise annoyance judgments J Acoust Soc Am 122 6 2007 3483 3494
19. J.R. Stroop Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions J Exp Psychol 12 1935 643 662
20. C.M. MacLeod Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review Psychol Bull 109 2 1991 163 203
21. D.C. Howell Statistical methods for psychology 7th ed. 2007 Wadsworth Cengage learning, USA
22. S. Kuhnt, C. Schürmann, M. Schütte, E. Wenning, B. Griefahn, and M. Vormann Modelling annoyance from combined traffic noises: an experimental study Acta Acust Unit Acust 94 3 2008 393 400
23. J.M. Fields, R.G. de Jong, T. Gjestand, I.H. Flindell, R.F.S. Job, and S. Kurra Standardized general purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: research and a recommendation J Sound Vib 242 4 2001 641 679
24. ISO TC 43/SC 1 2002. Acoustics - assessment of noise annoyance by means of social and socio-acoustic surveys. Geneva; 2002.
25. J. Hellbrück Category subdivision scaling - a powerful tool in audiometry and noise assessment H. Fastl, S. Kuwano, A. Schick, Recent trends in hearing research Festschrift for seiichiro namba 1996 Bibliotheks und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg Oldenburg 317 336
26. H.M.E. Miedema, and C.G.M. Oudshoorn Annoyance from transportation noise relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals Environ Health Persp 109 4 2001 409 416
27. K. Zimmer, J. Ghani, and W. Ellermeier The role of the task interference and exposure duration in judging noise annoyance J Sound Vib 311 2008 1039 1051
28. S. Kurra, M. Morimoto, and Z.I. Maekawa Transportation noise annoyance - a simulated environment study for road, railway and aircraft noises, part 2: activity disturbance and combined results J Sound Vib 220 2 1999 279 295
29. G. Tomei, F. Tecchio, F. Zappasodi, M. Ercolani, F. Moffa, and P. Chiovenda Exposure to traffic noise and effects on attention Annali di igiene: medicina preventiva e di comunit 18 6 2006 507 519
30. Schmid A, Hellbrück J. Detrimental effects of traffic noise on basic cognitive performance in adults. In Proceedings of the CFA/DAGA'04. Strasbourg, France; 2004. p. 189-90.
31. Meis M. Habituation to suboptimal environments: the effect of transportation noise on children's task performance. In Results of oldenburg symposium on psychological acoustics; 2000. p. 509-31.
32. J.F. Park, and M.C. Payne Effects of noise level and difficulty of task in performing division J Appl Psychol 47 1963 367 368
33. Philipps C, Champelovier P, Bruyere JC. Importance relative du nombre de bruits d'avions, de leur niveau de crête, de leur énergie globale dans la gêne exprimée. Rapport INRETS-LEN, n 9618; 1996.
34. Vogt J, Mauss I, Lahl O, Kalveram KT. The impact of aircraft noise and number: A full factorial laboratory design. In Schick A, Klatte M. (editors), Contribution to psychological acoustics, Results of the 7th oldenburg symposium on psychological acoustics; 1997. p. 99-106.
35. J. Vogt The relative impact of aircraft noise and number in a full-factorial laboratory design J Sound Vib 282 2005 1085 1100
36. Summary report of the international forum on aircraft noise impacts research, FAA, 62 pages, < http://www.fican.org/pdf/faa/ IntlForumSummaryReport-11-19-09.pdf >; 2009.
37. Sukowski H, Klatte M, Meis M, Schick A. Effects of different kinds of traffic noise on reading and attention performance in elementary school children. In Proceeding of the CFA/DAGA'04. Strasbourg, France; 2004. p. 191-2.