Do people react more strongly to aircraft noise today than in the past?

Applied Acoustics

Volumn 70, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 747-752

  Brooker, Peter ^a  

^a NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Annoyance; Exposure response; Sensitisation; Statistics; Surveys

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SAMPLING; STATISTICAL TESTS; STRUCTURAL LOADS; SURVEYS;

AIRCRAFT NOISE; ANNOYANCE; COLLECTION METHODS; COMMUNITY RESPONSE; EXPOSURE-RESPONSE; NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS; NOISE EXPOSURES; PARTICIPATION RATES; SENSITISATION; SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSIONS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL EVIDENCES; STATISTICS; UPWARD TRENDS;

NOISE POLLUTION;

EID: 60449084381     PISSN: 0003682X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Brooker P. The UK aircraft noise index study [ANIS]: 20 years on. Acoust Bull (2004) 10-16. May/June
2. Guski R. How to forecast community annoyance in planning noisy facilities. Noise Health 6 22 (2004) 59-64
3. van Kempen EEMM, van Kamp I. Annoyance from air traffic noise. Possible trends in exposure-response relationships, report no: 01/2005 MGO Evk, RIVM, Builthoven; 2005.
4. Schreckenberg D, Meis M. Noise annoyance around an international airport planned to be extended. Inter-noise 2007, Istanbul, Turkey; 2007. .
5. Brooker P, Critchley JB, Monkman DJ, Richmond C. United Kingdom aircraft noise index study (ANIS): main report DR report 8402, CAA on behalf of the Department of Transport, London; 1985.
6. Ollerhead JB, Diamond I. Social surveys of night-time effects of aircraft noise. In: Noise and man' 93: noise as a public health problem (sixth international congress), INRETS, Arcueil, France, 1993;3:373-6.
7. Fidell S., Silvati L., and Haboly E. Social survey of community response to a step change in aircraft noise exposure. J Acoust Soc Am 111 1 (2002) 200-209
8. Fidell S., and Silvati L. Parsimonious alternative to regression analysis for characterizing prevalence rates of aircraft noise annoyance. Noise Contr Eng J 5 2 (2004) 56-68
9. de Leeuw E. To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys. J Off Stat 21 2 (2005) 233-255
10. Graham C. Mixed mode surveys: a review for the NHS acute patient survey programme. Picker Institute Europe; 2007. .
11. McColl E, Jacoby A, Thomas L, Soutter J, Bamford C, Steen N, et al. Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health technology assessment [HTA] [NHS R&D HTA programme], 2001;5(31). .
12. Groves R.M., Presser S., and Dipko S. The role of topic interest in survey participation decisions. Public Opin Quart 68 1 (2004) 2-31
13. Whitfield A. Assessment of noise annoyance in three distinct communities living in close proximity to a UK regional airport. Int J Environ Health Res 13 4 (2003) 361-372