Habitat preference of Zoantharia genera depends on host sponge morphology;La preferencia de hábitat de géneros de Zoantharia depende de la morfología de la esponja

Universitas Scientiarum

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 110-121

  Montenegro González, Javier ^a   Acosta, Alberto ^a  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Epizoanthus; Host; Morphology; Parazoanthus; Sponge; Symbiont

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650768048     PISSN: 01227483     EISSN: 20271352     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11144/javeriana.sc15-2.hpoz     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Manly B, McDonald L, Thomas D. Resource Selection by Animals. Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies. Chapman & Hall, London, UK. 1993, 220p.
2. Batzli GO, Lesieutre C. The influence of high quality food on habitat use by arctic microtine rodents. Oikos 1991; 60, 299-306.
3. Lubin Y, Ellner S, Kotzman M. Web relocation and habitat selection in a desert widow spider. Ecology 1993; 75, 2456-2459.
4. Morris DW. Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection. Oecologia 2003; 136, 1-13.
5. Brinkman AG, Dankers N, van Stralen M. An analysis of mussel bed habitats in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Helgoland Marine Research 2002; 56, 59-75.
6. Krausman RP. Some Basic Principles of Habitat Use. Grazing Behavior of Livestock and Wildlife. University of Idaho. Idaho Forest, Wildlife, and Range Experiment Station Bulletin 1999; 70, 85-90.
7. Meager JJ, Utne-Palm AC. Effect of turbidity on habitat preference of juvenile Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua. Environmental Biology of Fishes 2007; 81, 149-155.
8. Litvaitis JA, Tittus K, Anderson EM. Measuring vertebrates use of terrestrial habitats and foods. 1994; 254-274. In Koeln GT, Cowardin LM, Strong LL. Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats. 5th ed. Wildlife Society Bethesda, Maryland. 1994.
9. Matthiopoulus J. The use of space by animals as a function of accessibility and preference. Ecological Modelling and Systems Ecology 2003; 159, 239-268.
10. Underwood AJ, Chapman MG, Crowe TP. Identifying and understanding ecological preferences for habitat or prey. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 2004; 300, 161-187.
11. Thrall PH, Hochberg ME, Burdon JJ, Bever JD. Coevolution of symbiotic mutualists and parasites in a community context. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2006; 22, 120-126.
12. Clavico EEG, Muricy G, da Gama BAP, Batista D, Ventura CRR, Pereira RC. Ecological roles of natural products from the marine sponge Geodia corticostylifera. Marine Biology 2006; 148, 479-488.
13. Chavarro SB, Zea S, Diaz JM. Esponjas y otros Microhabitat de ofiuros (Ofiuroidea: Echinodermata) en ambientes arrecifales del archipiélago de San Bernardo (Caribe Colombiano). Boletín de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras 2004; 33, 29-47.
14. Betancourt LM, González FF, González AB, García G, Rolando BZ. Variation of antimicrobial activity of the sponge Aplysina fistularis (Pallas, 1766) and its relation to associated fauna. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 1998; 223, 1-18.
15. Reimer JD, Sinniger F, Hickman CPJr. Zoanthid diversity (Anthozoa: Hexacorallia) in the Galapagos Island: a molecular examination. Coral Reefs 2008; 27, 641-654.
16. Swain TD, Wulff JL. Diversity and specificity of Caribbean sponge-zoanthid symbioses: a foundation for understanding the adaptive significance of symbioses and generating hypotheses about higher-order systematics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 2007; 92, 695-711.
17. Lincoln R, Boxshall G, Clark P. A dictionary of ecology, evolution and systematic. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA. 1998, 371p.
18. Zhou D, Hyde KD. Host-specificity, host-exclusivity, and host-recurrence in saprobic fungi. Mycological Research 2001; 105, 1449-1457.
19. West DA. Symbiotic zoanthids (Anthozoa:Cnidaria) of Puerto Rico. Bulletin of Marine Science 1979; 29, 253-271.
20. Crocker LA, Reiswig HM. Host Specificity in Sponge-Encrusting Zoanthidea (Anthozoa: Zoantharia) of Barbados, West Indies. Marine Biology 1981; 65, 231-236.
21. Geister J, Díaz JM. A field guide to the oceanic barrier reefs and atolls of the southwestern Caribbean (Archipelago of San Andres and Providencia, Colombia). Proceedings of the 8th International Coral Reef Symposium 1997; 1, 235-262.
22. Zea S. Esponjas del Caribe Colombiano. Primera Edición. Catálogo Científico. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas de Punta Betín-INVEMAR. Santa Marta, Colombia. 1987, 286p.
23. Acosta A, Casas M, Vargas CA, Camacho JE. Lista de Zoantharia (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) del Caribe y Colombia. Biota Colombiana 2005; 6, 147-162.
24. Bell JJ, Barnes DK. Sponge morphological diversity: a qualitative predictor of Species Diversity?. Aquatic Conservation 2001; 11, 109-121.
25. Wulff JL. Resistance vs recovery: morphological strategies of coral reef sponges. Functional Ecology 2006; 20, 699-708.
26. Chanas B, Pawlik RJ. Defenses of Caribbean sponges against predatory reef fish. II. Spicules, tissue toughness, and nutritional quality. Marine Ecology Progress Series 1995; 127, 195-211.
27. Hibbeler RC. Mechanics of materials. 5th Edition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA. 2003, 864p.
28. Crocker LL. The ecology of the Zoanthid-Sponge symbiosis in Barbados. M.Sc. Thesis. Biological Sciences Faculty, McGill University, Montreal, 1978, 98 p.
29. Vargas C. Zoanthideos (Anthozoa:Hexacorallia) del complejo arrecifal y litoral rocoso de la isla de San Andrés, Caribe Colombiano. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá D.C. Colombia. 2002, 49p.
30. Montenegro J, Acosta A. Programa innovador para evaluar uso y preferencia de hábitat. Universitas Scientiarum 2008; 13, 115-124.
31. Colwell RK, Futuyma DJ. On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology 1971; 52, 567-576.
32. Hurlbert SH. The measurement of niche overlap and some relatives. Ecology 1978; 59, 67-77.
33. Latino S, Beltzer A. Ecología trófica del benteveo Pitangus sulphuratus (aves: Tyrannidae) en el valle de inundación del río Paraná, Argentina. Organismes i Sistemes 1999; 14, 69-78.
34. Jacob J. Quantitative measurement of food selection. A modification of foraging ratio and Ivlev's electivity index. Oecologia 1974; 14, 413-417.
35. Ivlev VS. Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. Yale University Press.
36. New Haven. 1961. In Cock MJW. The Assessment of Preference. Journal of Animal Ecology 1978; 47, 805-816.
37. Manly BFJ, Miller P, Cook LM. Analysis of a selective predation experiment. American Naturalist 1972; 106, 719-136.
38. Chesson J. Measuring preference in selective predation. Ecology 1978; 59, 211-215.
39. Cherry S. A Comparison of Confidence Interval Methods for Habitat Use-Availability Studies. Journal of Wildlife Management 1996; 60, 653-658.
40. Hall LS, Krausman PR, Morrison ML. The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. Wildlife Society Bulletin 1997; 25, 173-182.
41. Yu SL, Lee TW. Habitat preference of the stream fish, Sinogastromyzon puliensis (Homalopteridae). Zoological Studies 2002; 4, 183-187.
42. Ilan M, Ben-Eliahu MN, Galil BS. Three deep water sponges from the eastern Mediterranean and their associated fauna. Ophelia 1994; 39, 45-54.
43. Klitgaard AB. The fauna associated with outer shelf and upper slope sponges (Porifera: Demospongiae) at Faroe Islands, northeastern Atlantic. Sarsia 1998; 80, 1-22.
44. Rubenstein DI, Koehl MAR. The Mechanisms of Filter Feeding: Some Theoretical Considerations. American Naturalist 1977; 111, 981-994.
45. Sebens KP, DeRiemer K. Diel cycles of expansion and contraction in coral reef anthozoans. Marine Biology 1977; 43, 247-256.
46. Day RJ. Algal symbiosis in Bunodeopsis: sea anemones with 'auxiliary' structures. Biological Bulletin 1994; 186, 182-194.
47. Kaandorp JA. Morphological analysis of growth forms of branching marine sessile organisms along environmental gradients. Marine Biology 1999; 134, 295-306.
48. Kaandorp JA, Lowe CP, Frenkel D, Sloot PMA. Effect of Nutrient Diffusion and Flow on Coral Morphology. Physical Review Letters 1996; 77, 2328-2331.
49. Manconi R, Pronzato R. Life cycle of Spongilla lacustris (Porifera, Spongillidae): a cue for environment-dependent phenotype. Hydrobiologia 1991; 220, 155-160.
50. Connes R, Patis J, Sube J. Réactions tissulaires de quelques démosponges vis-a-vis de leurs commensaux et parasítes. Naturaliste Canadien 1971; 98, 923-935.
51. Willenz P, Hartman WD. Skeletal reaction of the Caribbean coralline sponge Calcifibrospongia actinostromarioides Hartman toward an epizoic zoanthidea. In: van Soest RWM, van Kempen TMG, Braekman JC(ed) Sponges in space and time. Biology, Chemistry, Paleontology. Balkema, Rotterdam: 1994; 1, 279-288.
52. Lewis SM. Sponge-zoanthid associations: Functional interactions. Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences 1982; 12, 465-474.
53. Rodriguez SR, Ojeda FP, Inestrosa NC. Settlement of benthic marine invertebrates. Marine Ecology Progress Series 1993; 97, 193-207.
54. Babcock RC, Ryland JS. Larval development of a tropical zoanthid (Protopalythoa sp.). Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 1990; 17, 229-236.
55. López M, Zea S. Current trends of space occupation by encrusting excavating sponges on Colombian coral reefs. Marine Ecology 2005; 26, 33-41.