Sensor classification for the fault detection and isolation, a structural approach

International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-17

  Commault, C ^a   Dion, J M ^a   Trinh, D H ^b   Do, T H ^a  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^b CENTRE DE RECHERCHE EN AUTOMATIQUE DE NANCY   (France)

Author keywords

fault detection and isolation; linear structured systems; sensor classification; sensor failure

Indexed keywords

LINEAR SYSTEMS; OBSERVABILITY; SENSORS; STATE SPACE METHODS;

FAULT DETECTION AND ISOLATION; NON-EXISTENCE; PARAMETERIZED; PHYSICAL STRUCTURES; POLYNOMIAL ALGORITHM; PRIOR KNOWLEDGE; RELATIVE IMPORTANCE; SENSOR FAILURE; STATE SPACE MODEL; STRUCTURAL APPROACH; STRUCTURED MODEL; STRUCTURED SYSTEMS; UNKNOWN INPUT DISTURBANCES;

FAULT DETECTION;

EID: 78650766710     PISSN: 08906327     EISSN: 10991115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acs.1186     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Chen J, Patton R,. Robust Model-based Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 1999.
2. Frank PM,. Analytical and qualitative model-based fault diagnosisâa survey and some new results. European Journal of Control 1996; 2: 6-28.
3. Blanke M, Kinnaert M, Lunze J, Staroswiecki M,. Diagnosis and Fault-tolerant Control. Springer: Berlin, 2003.
4. Armeni S, Casavola A, Mosca E,. Robust fault detection and isolation for LPV systems under a sensitivity constraint. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 2009; 23: 55-72.
5. Commault C, Dion JM, Trinh DH,. Observability preservation under sensor failure. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 2008; 53 (6): 1554-1559.
6. Krysander M, Ãslund J, Nyberg M,. An efficient algorithm for finding minimal over-constrained sub-systems for model-based diagnosis. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A, IEEE Transactions 2008; 38 (1): 197-206.
7. Dustegor D, Frisk E, Cocquempot V, Krysander M, Staroswiecki M,. Structural analysis of fault isolability in the damadics benchmark. Control Engineering Practice 2006; 14: 597-608.
8. Verde C,. Structural analysis for fault diagnosis in a pipeline. IFAC Symposium SSC 04, Oaxaca, Mexico, 2004.
9. Samantaray AK, Ould-Bouamama B,. Model-based Process Supervision: A Bond Graph Approach. Advances in Industrial Control. Springer: London, 2008.
10. Lin C,. Structural controllability. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1974; 19: 201-208.
11. Dion JM, Commault C, van der Woude J,. Generic properties and control of linear structured systems: a survey. Automatica 2003; 39 (7): 1125-1144.
12. Staroswiecki M, Hoblos G, Aitouche A,. Sensor network design for fault tolerant estimation. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 2004; 18: 55-72.
13. Commault C, Dion JM, Do TH, Trinh DH,. Sensor classification for observability preservation under sensor failure. IFAC SafeProcess. 09, Barcelona, Spain, 2009.
14. Murota K,. Systems Analysis by Graphs and Matroids. Algorithms and Combinatorics, vol. 3. Springer: New York, 1987.
15. Commault C, Dion JM, Sename O, Motyeian R,. Observer-based fault detection and isolation for structured systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 2002; 47 (12): 2074-2079.
16. Commault C, Dion JM, Yacoub-Agha S,. Sensor classification for the fault detection and isolation problem. IFAC Symposium SSC 07, Iguazu Falls, Brazil, 2007.
17. 5/2 algorithm for maximum matchings in bipartite graphs. SIAM Journal on Computing 1973; 2: 225-231.
18. Commault C, Dion JM,. Sensor location for diagnosis in linear systems: a structural analysis. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 2007; 52 (2): 155-169.