Analytical and qualitative model-based fault diagnosis - A survey and some new results

European Journal of Control

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 6-28

  Frank, P M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Diagnostic observers; Fault detection; Fault diagnosis; Fuzzy logic; Model based fault detection; Qualitative modelling; Quantitative modelling

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345929238     PISSN: 09473580     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0947-3580(96)70024-9     Document Type: Review

References (96)

1. Barschdorff D. Adaptive Echtzeitverfahren als Hilfsmittel der Fehlerdiagnose. GMA-Aussprachetag, Baden-Baden, VDI-Berichte Nr. 854, 1990
2. Basseville M, Benveniste A. (eds) Detection of abrupt changes in signals and dynamic systems. Lecture notes in control and information sciences, vol. 77, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1985
3. Brunet J, Jaume D, Labarrère M, Rault A, Vergé M. Détection et diagnostic de pannes, approche par modélisation. Hermes, Paris, 1990
4. Frank PM, Keller L. Entdeckung von Instrumentenfehlanzeigen mittels Zustandsschätzung in technischen Regelungssystemen. VDI Fortschrittsberichte, Reihe 8, Nr 80, 1984
5. Patton RJ, Frank PM, Clark RN (eds). Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems, theory and application. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989
6. Tzafestes SG, Singh M, Schmidt G (Hrsg). System fault diagnostics, reliability and related knowledge based approaches. Vol. I, II, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1986
7. Chow EY, Willsky AS. Analytical redundancy and the design of robust failure detection systems. IEEE Trans Autom Contr 1984; 29;603-614
8. de Kleer I, Williams BC. Diagnosing multiple faults. Artificial Intelligence 1987; No. 32;97-130
9. Filbert D. Fault diagnosis in nonlinear electromechanical systems by continuous time parameter estimation. ISA Transactions 1985; 24, No. 3
10. Frank PM. Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using analytical and knowledge-based redundancy - A survey and some new results. Automatica 1990; 26;459-474
11. Frank PM. Enhancement of robustness in observer-based fault detection. Proc. IFAC/IMACS symp. SAFEPROCESS 1991, 1;275-287; Int J Control 1994; 59;955-981
12. Frank PM. Enhancement of robustness in observer-based fault detection. Proc. IFAC/IMACS symp. SAFEPROCESS 1991, 1;275-287; Int J Control 1994; 59;955-981
13. Frank PM. Robust model-based fault detection in dynamic systems. Preprints IFAC symposium on-line fault detection in the chemical process industries. Newark, Delaware, 1992, 1-13
14. Frank PM. Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using software redundancy. European Journal of Diagnosis and Safety in Automation 1(2) 1992; 113-143
15. Frank PM. Advances in observer-based fault diagnosis. Proc. of the Conference TOOLIDIAG '93, Toulouse, CERT, France, April 5-8, 1993 vol. 3, 817-836
16. Frank PM, Seliger R. Fault detection and isolation in automatic processes. In Leondes (ed). Control and dynamic systems, advances in theory and applications, vol 49, Part 5. Academic Press, New York 1991, 241-287
17. Frank PM, Ding X. Frequency domain approach to minimizing detectable faults in FDI systems. Appl Math Comp Sci 1993; 3, No. 3;417-443
18. Gertler J. Analytical redundancy methods in fault detection and isolation. Proc. of the IFAC/IMACS Symposium SAFEPROCESS, 1991, Baden-Baden, vol. 1, 9-21
19. Gertler J, Singer D. A new structural framework for parity equation based failure detection and isolation. Automatica 1990; 26;381-388
20. Isermann R. Fehlerdiagnose mit Prozeßmodellen. Technisches Messen, 51. Jg 1984; Heft 10;345-355
21. Isermann R. Wissensbasierte Fehlerdiagnose technischer Prozesse, at-Automatisierungstechnik, 36. Jahrgang, Heft 11, 1988
22. Isermann R. Fault diagnosis of machines via parameter estimation and knowledge processing. Automatica 1993; 29;815-836
23. Milne R. Strategies for diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1987; SMC-17;333-339
24. Patton RJ, Chen J. A review of parity space approaches to fault diagnosis. Proc. IFAC/IMACS Symp. SAFEPROCESS, Baden-Baden, 1991, vol. 1, 239-255
25. Patton RJ. Robustness issues in fault-tolerant control. TOOLDIAG '93 Int. conf. on fault diagnosis, Toulouse, France, 5-7 April 1993, late paper
26. Willsky AS. A survey of design methods for failure detection in dynamic systems. Automatica 1976; 12; 601-611
27. Frank PM, Wünnenberg J. Robust fault diagnosis using unknown input observer schemes. In Patton RJ, Frank PM, Clark RN (eds). Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems, theory and application. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989
28. Delmaire G, Cassar JP, Staroswiecki M. Comparison of identification and parity space approach for failure detection in single-input single-output systems. IEEE conference on control applications, Glasgow, 1994, vol. 2, 865-870
29. Staroswiecki M, Cassar JP, Cocquempot V. Generation of optimal structured residuals in the parity space. Proc. IFAC 12th world congress, Sydney, 1993, vol 5, 535-542
30. Gertler J. Diagnosing parametric faults: From parameter estimation to parity relations. ACC 1995, Seattle, 1615-1620
31. Gertler J Kunwer M. Optimal residual decoupling for robust fault diagnosis. Int J Control 1995; 61;395-421
32. Patton RJ, Kangethe SM. Robust fault diagnosis using eigenstructure assignment of observers. In Patton RJ, Frank PM Clark RN (eds). Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems, theory and application. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989
33. Wünnenberg J. Observer-based fault detection in dynamic systems. Diss. Universität Duisburg, Fachgebiet Meß- und Regelungstechnik, Fortschrittsberichte VDI, Reihe 8, Nr 222, VDI-Verlag Düsseldorf, 1990
34. Ding X, Frank PM. Fault detection via factorization approach. Syst. Contr. Lett. 1990; 14;431-436
35. Ding X, Frank PM. Frequency domain approach and threshold selector for robust model-based fault detection and isolation. Proc. IFAC/IMACS Symp. SAFEPROCESS, Baden-Baden, 1991, 307-312
36. Ding X. Frequenzbereichsverfahren zur beobachtergestützten Fehlerentdeckung. Diss. Universität Duisburg, Fachgebiet Meß- und Regelungstechnik 1991, VDI Fortschrittsbericht Reihe 8, Meß-, Steuerrungs- und Regelungstechnik Nr. 295, 1992
37. Frank PM, Ding X. Frequency domain approach to optimally robust residual generation and evaluation for model-based fault diagnosis. Automatica May 1994; 30;789-804
38. Staroswiecki M, Cocquempot V, Cassar JP. A general approach for multicriteria optimization of structured residuals. Proc. TOOLDIAG '93, Toulouse, April 5-8, 1993, vol. 2, 800-807
39. Seliger, R. Robuste beobachtergestritzte Fehlerdelektion in nicht-linearen unsicheren systemen. Diss. Universitäl Duisburg, Fachgebiet Meß-und Regelungstechnik, Fortschoittsberichle VDI Reihe 8, Nr. 344, VDI-Verlag Düsseldorf, 1993
40. Clark RN. State estimation schemes for instrument fault detection. In Patton RJ, Frank PM, Clark RN (eds). Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems, theory and application. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989
41. Gertler J. An evidential reasoning extension to quantitative model-based failure diagnosis. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man and Cybernetics 1992; 22;275-289
42. Alcorta Garcia E, Frank PM. On the relationship between observer and parameter identification based approaches to fault detection. IFAC World Congress San Francisco 1996
43. Isermann R, Freyermuth B. Process fault diagnosis based on process model knowledge, Parts I (Principles for fault diagnosis with parameter estimation) and II (Case study experiments). ASME J Dynamic Systems, Measurement Control 1991; 113; 620-626, 627-633
44. Rault A, Jaume D, Vergé M. Industrial process fault detection and localization. Proc. IFAC 9th world congress, Budapest, vol 4, 1984, 1789-1794
45. Goodwin GC, Sin KS. Adaptive filtering, prediction and control. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984
46. Magni J-F. On continuous time parameter identification by using observers. IEEE Trans Aut Control October 1995 vol. 40, Nr, 10, 1789-1792
47. Emami-Naeini AE et al. Effect of model uncertainty of failure detection: the threshold selector. IEEE Trans. Aut. Control, AC-33 1988; 2;1106-1115
48. Willsky AS, Jones HL. A generalized likelihood ratio testing approach for the detection and estimation of jumps in linear systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1976; 21;108-112
49. Frélicot C. Un système adaptif de diagnostic par reconnaissance des formes floue. Thèse UTC, 1992
50. Montmain J, Gentil S. Decision-making in fault detection: a fuzzy approach. TOOLDIAG '93, International conference on fault diagnosis, Toulouse, 1993, vol. 2 653-660
51. Sauter D, Dubois G, Levrat E, Brémont J. Fault diagnosis in systems using fuzzy logic, EUFIT '93, first European congress on Fuzzy and Intelligent Technologies, Aachen, Germany, 1993, vol. 2, 781-788
52. Schneider H. Implementation of a fuzzy concept for supervision and fault detection of robots. EUFIT '93, Proc. first European congress on fuzzy and intelligent technologies, Aachen, 7-10 September 1993, vol. 2, 775-780
53. Ulieru M. A fuzzy-logic based computer assisted fault diagnosis system. TOOLDIAG '93, Toulouse, France, 1993, vol. 2, 689-698
54. Himmelblau DM, Braker RW, Suewatanakul W. Fault classification with the aid of artificial neural networks. IFAC/IMAC-Symposium SAFEPROCESS '91 Baden-Baden, Sept. 10-13, 1991, 369-373
55. Himmelblau DM. Use of artificial neural networks to monitor faults and for troubleshooting in the process industries. IFAC symposium on-line fault detection and supervision in the chemical process industries. Newark, Delaware, April 22-24 1992, 144-149
56. Hoskins JC, Kaliyur KM, Himmelblau DM. Fault diagnosis in complex chemical plants using artificial neural networks. AIChE J 1991; 37;137-142
57. Köppen-Seliger B, Frank PM. Fault detection and isolation in technical processes with neural networks. Conference on Decision and Control CDC'95, New Orleans, 1995, 2414-2419
58. Sorsa T, Suontausta J, Koivo HN. Dynamic fault diagnosis using radial basis function networks. TOOLDIAG'93, Toulouse, April 5-7; 1993, vol. 1, 160-169
59. Tzafestas SG, Dalianis PJ. Fault diagnosis in complex systems using artificial neural networks. The third IEEE conference on control applications, Glasgow, August 24-26, 1994, 877-882
60. Scarl E. Diagnosis and sensor validation through knowledge of structure and function. IEEE Trans Syst, Man Cybernetics 1987; 17;360-369
61. Dvorak D, Kuipers BJ. Model-based monitoring of dynamic systems. Proceedings of the 11th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, vol 2, 1989
62. Kiupel N, Frank PM. Process supervision with the aid of fuzzy logic. IEEE/SMC Conference, Le Touquet, October 1993, 2, 409-414
63. Ulieru M, Isermann R. Design of a fuzzy logic based diagnostic model for technical processes. Proc. Int. '92 ASME conference fuzzy signals and systems, Geneva, 1992
64. Davis R. Diagnostic reasoning based on structure and behavior. Artificial Intelligence 1984; 24;347-410
65. Genesereth MR. The use of design descriptions in automated diagnosis. Artificial Intelligence 1984; 24;411-436
66. Reiter R. A theory of diagnosis from first principles. Artificial Intelligence 1987; 32;57-95
67. Forbus KD. Qualitative process theory. Artificial Intelligence 1984; 24;85-168
68. de Kleer I, Brown JS. A qualitative physics based on confluences. Artificial Intelligence 1984; 24;7-83
69. Kuipers B. Common sense reasoning about causality: Deriving behavior from structure. Artificial Intelligence 1984; 24;169-204
70. Kuipers B. Qualitative simulation. Artificial Intelligence 1986; 29;289-338
71. Kuipers B. Qualitative simulation as causal explanation. IEEE Trans Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1987; 17, No 3;432-444
72. Leitch RR, Shen Q, Coghil G, Chantier M, Slater A. Qualitative model-based diagnosis of dynamic systems. Colloquium of the Institution of Measurement and Control, London, January 1994
73. Ng HT. Model-based, multiple fault diagnosis of time-varying, continuous physical devices. Proceedings of the sixth conference on AI applications, Santa Barbara, CA, March 1990, 9-15
74. Oyeleye OO, Finch FE, Kramer MA. Qualitative modeling and fault diagnosis of dynamic processes by MIDAS. Chemical Engineering Communications 1990; 96;205-228
75. Terpstra VJ, Verbruggen HB, Hoogland MW, Ficke RAE. A real-time, fuzzy, deep-knowledge based fault-diagnosis system for CSTR. IFAC symposium on-line fault detection in the chemical process industries, Newark, Delaware, 1992, 26-31
76. Berleant D, Kuipers B. Qualitative-numeric simulation with Q3. Faltings B, Strass P. (eds). Recent advances in qualitative physics, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1992, 3-16
77. Shen Q, Leitch R. Fuzzy qualitative simulation. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1993; 23, No. 4;1038-1064
78. Leitch RR, Shen Q. Prioritising behaviour in qualitative simulation. 13th Int. joint conf. on AI, 1993
79. Shen Q, Leitch R. Application studies of fuzzy qualitative simulation. In Borne P, Tzafestas SG (eds). Mathematics of the analysis and design of process control 1992
80. Jen Chang S, Di Cesare F, Goldbogen G. Failure propagation trees for diagnosis in manufacturing systems, Vol. 21. IEEE Trans Systems Man and Cybernetics July 1991; 21:767-776
81. Dubuisson B. Diagnostic et reconnaissances de formes. Hermes, Paris, 1990
82. Sorsa T, Koivo HN. Application of artificial neural networks in process fault diagnosis. IFAC/IMAC-symposium on fault detection supervision and safety for technical Processes, SAFEPROCESS'91, Baden-Baden, 10-13 Sept 1991, vol. 2, 133-138
83. Sticher T. Zur Integration von heuristischem Erfahrungswissen, qualitativen und quantitativen Modellen für die Anlageüberwachung und Alarmgenerierung. VDI-Fortschrittsberichte, Reihe 20, Nr 63, VDI Verlag Düsseldorf, 1992
84. [EUREKA Project EU996 DIALOGS].
85. Tzafestas SG. Knowledge-based system diagnosis, supervision and control. Plenum, New York, 1989
86. Tzafestas SG. System fault diagnosis using the knowledge-based methodology. Chapter 15 in Patton RJ, Frank PM, Clark RN (eds). Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems, theory and application. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989
87. Forbus KD. Interpreting measurements of physical systems. Proceedings of the fifth national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI-86), 1986, 113-117
88. Frank PM, Kiupel N. Fuzzy supervision for lean production. Proc. 6th IAR Colloqu. Duisburg, 1992, 163-177; see also Frank PM, Kiupel N. Fuzzy supervision. at-Automatisierungstechnik 41, 1993; Heft 8;293-299
89. Frank PM, Kiupel N. Fuzzy supervision for lean production. Proc. 6th IAR Colloqu. Duisburg, 1992, 163-177; see also Frank PM, Kiupel N. Fuzzy supervision. at-Automatisierungstechnik 41, 1993; Heft 8;293-299
90. Himmelblau DM. Fault detection and diagnosis - today and tomorrow. IFAC Kyoto workshop on fault detection and safety in chemical plants, Kyoto, Japan, Sept 28-Oct 1, 1986, 95-105
91. Sorsa T, Koivo HN, Korhonen R. Application of neural networks in the detection of breaks in a paper machine. IFAC symposium on-line fault detection and supervision in the chemical process industries. Newark, Delaware, April 22-24, 1992, 162-167
92. Polycarpou MM, Vemuri AT. Learning methodology for failure detection and accomodation. IEEE Control Systems Intelligence and Learning 1995; 15, No 3; 16-24
93. Fathi ZW, Ramirez F, Tavarez AP. A knowledge-based system with embedded estimation components for fault detection and isolation in process plants. IFAC symposium on-line fault detection in chemical process industries, Newark, Delaware 1992, 32-37
94. Fink PK, Lusth JC. Expert systems and diagnostic expertise in mechanical and electrical domains. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1987; SMC-17
95. Zhang J. Expert systems in on-line process control and fault diagnosis. PhD thesis, City University, London, 1991
96. Freyermuth B. Wissensbasierte Fehlerdiagnose am Beispiel eines Industrierobotes. VDI Berichte, Reihe 8, Nr 315, 1993