Studies on the inference of protein binding regions across fold space based on structural similarities

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 499-508

  Teyra, Joan ^a   Hawkins, John ^a   Zhu, Hongbo ^a   Pisabarro, M Teresa ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Binding inference; Binding region; Fold space; Non sequential structural alignment (ns SA); Protein interface; Structural similarity

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; DATA BASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FOLDING;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; PROTEINS; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 78650761785     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22897     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Available at .
2. Aloy P, Russell RB. Ten thousand interactions for the molecular biologist. Nat Biotechnol 2004; 22: 1317-1321.
3. Aloy P, Ceulemans H, Stark A, Russell RB. The relationship between sequence and interaction divergence in proteins. J Mol Biol 2003; 332: 989-998.
4. Aloy P, Russell RB. Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 5896-5901.
5. Teyra J, Paszkowski-Rogacz M, Anders G, Pisabarro MT. SCOWLP classification: structural comparison and analysis of protein binding regions. BMC Bioinformatics 2008; 9: 9.
6. Teyra J, Doms A, Schroeder M, Pisabarro MT. SCOWLP: a web-based database for detailed characterization and visualization of protein interfaces. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7: 104.
7. Winter C, Henschel A, Kim WK, Schroeder M. SCOPPI: a structural classification of protein-protein interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34(Database issue): D310-314.
8. Ogmen U, Keskin O, Aytuna AS, Nussinov R, Gursoy A. PRISM: protein interactions by structural matching. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33(Web Server issue): W331-W336.
9. Henrick K, Thornton JM. PQS: a protein quaternary structure file server. Trends Biochem Sci 1998; 23: 358-361.
10. Henschel A, Kim WK, Schroeder M. Equivalent binding sites reveal convergently evolved interaction motifs. Bioinformatics 2006; 22: 550-555.
11. Sippl MJ, Suhrer SJ, Gruber M, Wiederstein M. A discrete view on fold space. Bioinformatics 2008; 24: 870-871.
12. Pascual-Garcia A, Abia D, Ortiz AR, Bastolla U. Cross-over between discrete and continuous protein structure space: insights into automatic classification and networks of protein structures. PLoS Computational Biol 2009; 5: e1000331.
13. Petrey D, Honig B. Is protein classification necessary? Toward alternative approaches to function annotation. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009; 19: 363-368.
14. Taylor WR. Evolutionary transitions in protein fold space. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2007; 17: 354-361.
15. Skolnick J, Arakaki AK, Lee SY, Brylinski M. The continuity of protein structure space is an intrinsic property of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 15690-15695.
16. Yuan X, Bystroff C. Non-sequential structure-based alignments reveal topology-independent core packing arrangements in proteins. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 1010-1019.
17. Abyzov A, Ilyin VA. A comprehensive analysis of non-sequential alignments between all protein structures. BMC Struct Biol 2007; 7: 78.
18. Guerler A, Knapp EW. Novel protein folds and their non-sequential structural analogs. Protein Sci 2008; 17: 1374-1382.
19. Dundas J, Binkowski TA, DasGupta B, Liang J. Topology independent protein structural alignment. BMC Bioinformatics 2007; 8: 388.
20. Keskin O, Nussinov R. Favorable scaffolds: proteins with different sequence, structure and function may associate in similar ways. Protein Eng Des Sel 2005; 18: 11-24.
21. Russell RB, Sasieni PD, Sternberg MJ. Supersites within superfolds. Binding site similarity in the absence of homology. J Mol Biol 1998; 282: 903-918.
22. Aytuna AS, Gursoy A, Keskin O. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by combining structure and sequence conservation in protein interfaces. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 2850-2855.
23. Gunther S, May P, Hoppe A, Frommel C, Preissner R. Docking without docking: ISEARCH-prediction of interactions using known interfaces. Proteins 2007; 69: 839-844.
24. Everitt BS, Landau S, Leese M. Cluster Analysis: Hodder Arnold; p. 224, 2001.
25. Gordon AD. Classification: Chapman & Hall/CRC; p. 272, 1999.
26. Zhu H, Domingues FS, Sommer I, Lengauer T. NOXclass: prediction of protein-protein interaction types. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7: 27.
27. Carugo O, Argos P. Protein-protein crystal-packing contacts. Protein Sci 1997; 6: 2261-2263.
28. Krissinel E, Henrick K. Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. Acta Crystallographica Sect D-Biol Crystallography 2004; 60(Part 12 Part 1): 2256-2268.
29. Hubbart SJ, Thornton JM. NACCESS, Computer Program. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College London; 1993. Available at: .
30. Miller S, Lesk AM, Janin J, Chothia C. The accessible surface area and stability of oligomeric proteins. Nature 1987; 328: 834-836.
31. North BV, Curtis D, Sham PC. A note on the calculation of empirical P values from Monte Carlo procedures.[see comment]. Am J Hum Gene 2002; 71: 439-441.
32. Filipek R, Rzychon M, Oleksy A, Gruca M, Dubin A, Potempa J, Bochtler M. The Staphostatin-staphopain complex: a forward binding inhibitor in complex with its target cysteine protease. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 40959-40966.
33. Aloy P, Russell RB. Structural systems biology: modelling protein interactions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7: 188-197.
34. Rual JF, Venkatesan K, Hao T, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, Dricot A, Li N, Berriz GF, Gibbons FD, Dreze M, Ayivi-Guedehoussou N, Klitgord N, Simon C, Boxem M, Milstein S, Rosenberg J, Goldberg DS, Zhang LV, Wong SL, Franklin G, Li S, Albala JS, Lim J, Fraughton C, Llamosas E, Cevik S, Bex C, Lamesch P, Sikorski RS, Vandenhaute J, Zoghbi HY, Smolyar A, Bosak S, Sequerra R, Doucette-Stamm L, Cusick ME, Hill DE, Roth FP, Vidal M. Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature 2005; 437: 1173-1178.
35. Caffrey DR, Somaroo S, Hughes JD, Mintseris J, Huang ES. Are protein-protein interfaces more conserved in sequence than the rest of the protein surface? Protein Sci 2004; 13: 190-202.
36. Choi YS, Yang JS, Choi Y, Ryu SH, Kim S. Evolutionary conservation in multiple faces of protein interaction. Proteins 2009; 77: 14-25.
37. Teyra J, Pisabarro MT. Characterization of interfacial solvent in protein complexes and contribution of wet spots to the interface description. Proteins 2007; 67: 1087-1095.
38. Samsonov S, Teyra J, Pisabarro MT. A molecular dynamics approach to study the importance of solvent in protein interactions. Proteins 2008; 73: 515-525.
39. Rodier F, Bahadur RP, Chakrabarti P, Janin J. Hydration of protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 2005; 60: 36-45.
40. Mattos C. Protein-water interactions in a dynamic world. Trends Biochem Sci 2002; 27: 203-208.
41. Shatsky M, Shulman-Peleg A, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. The multiple common point set problem and its application to molecule binding pattern detection. J Comput Biol 2006; 13: 407-428.
42. Kim WK, Henschel A, Winter C, Schroeder M. The many faces of protein-protein interactions: a compendium of interface geometry. PLoS Comput Biol 2006; 2: e124.
43. Nair R, Liu J, Soong TT, Acton TB, Everett JK, Kouranov A, Fiser A, Godzik A, Jaroszewski L, Orengo C, Montelione GT, Rost B. Structural genomics is the largest contributor of novel structural leverage. J Struct Funct Genomics 2009; 10: 181-191.
44. Terwilliger TC, Stuart D, Yokoyama S. Lessons from structural genomics. Ann Rev Biophys 2009; 38: 371-383.
45. Andreeva A, Howorth D, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE, Hubbard TJ, Chothia C, Murzin AG. Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36(Database issue): D419-425.
46. Killcoyne S, Carter GW, Smith J, Boyle J. Cytoscape: a community-based framework for network modeling. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 563: 219-239.