HDPV: Interactive, faithful, in-vivo runtime state visualization for C/C++ and Java

SOFTVIS 2008 - Proceedings of the 4th ACM Symposium on Software Visualization

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 47-56

  Sundararaman, Jaishankar ^a   Back, Godmar ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Object viewer; Software visualization

Indexed keywords

EDUCATIONAL CONTEXTS; IN-VIVO; INTERACTIVITY; JAVA PROGRAMS; OBJECT VIEWER; PROGRAM UNDERSTANDING; PROGRAMMING ERRORS; RECURSIVE PROGRAMS; RUN-TIME; SOFTWARE VISUALIZATION; VISUAL DEBUGGING; VISUAL EFFECTS; VISUALIZATION TOOLS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DATA STRUCTURES; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; PROGRAM DEBUGGING; VISUAL COMMUNICATION; VISUALIZATION;

DATA VISUALIZATION;

EID: 78650760469     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1409720.1409729     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. BENTLEY, J. L., AND KERNIGHAN, B. W. 1991. A system for algorithm animation. Computing Systems 4, 1, 5-30.
2. BROWN, M. H., AND SEDGEWICK, R. 1984. A system for algorithm animation. In SIGGRAPH '84: Proceedings of the 11th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 177-186.
3. BROWN, M. H. 1991. Zeus: a system for algorithm animation and multi-view editing. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Visual. Languages, 4-9.
4. BRUNETON, E., LENGLET, R., AND COUPAYE, T. 2002. ASM: a code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems. Tech. rep., France Telecom R&D, Grenoble, France, November.
5. BUCHHEIM, C., JÜNGER, M., AND LEIPERT, S. 2002. Improving walker's algorithm to run in linear time. In GD '02: Revised Papers from the 10th International Symposium on Graph Drawing, Springer-Verlag, London, UK, 344-353.
6. CENTERLINE SOFTWARE, INC. 1991. ObjectCenter Reference. Cambridge, MA.
7. CHANDHOK, R. P., AND MILLER, P. L. 1989. The design and implementation of the Pascal GENIE. In CSC '89: Proceedings of the 17th conference on ACM Annual Computer Science Conference, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 374-379.
8. DE PAUW, W., JENSEN, E., MITCHELL, N., SEVITSKY, G., VLISSIDES, J. M., AND YANG, J. 2002. Visualizing the execution of Java programs. In Revised Lectures on Software Visualization, International Seminar, Springer-Verlag, London, UK, 151-162.
9. DEWAR, R. B. K., AND SCHONBERG, E. 2008. Computer science education: Where are the software engineers of tomorrow? CrossTalk, The Journal, of Defense Software Engineering 21, 1 (January), 28-30.
10. ERKAN, A. S., VANSLYKE, T. J., AND SCAFFTDI, T. M. 2007. Data structure visualization with LATEX and prefuse. SIGCSE Bull. 39, 3 (September), 301-305.
11. ERNST, M. D., PERKINS, J. H., GUO, P. J., MCCAMANT, S., PACHECO, C., TSCHANTZ, M. S., AND XIAO, C. 2007. The Daikon system for dynamic detection of likely invariants. Sci. Comput. Program. 69, 1-3, 35-45.
12. GOLDENSON, D. R. 1989. The impact of structured editing on introductory computer science education: the results so far. SIGCSE Bull. 21, 3 (September), 26-29.
13. GOPAL, P. 2006. Top: An infrastructure for detecting application-specific program errors by binary runtime instrumentation. Master's thesis, Virginia Tech.
14. HEER, J., CARD, S. K., AND LANDAY, J. A. 2005. prefuse: a toolkit for interactive information visualization. In CHI '05: Proceeding of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 421-430.
15. HENDRIX, D. T., JAMES, AND BAROWSKI, L. A. 2004. An extensible framework for providing dynamic data structure visualizations in a lightweight IDE. In SIGCSE '04: Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 387-391.
16. HENDRIX, D., CROSS, J. H., JAIN, J., AND BAROWSKI, L. 2007. Providing data structure animations in a lightweight IDE. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 178, 101-109.
17. HENRY, R. R., WHALEY, K. M., AND FORSTALL, B. 1990. The University of Washington illustrating compiler. In PLDI '90: Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 1990 conference on Programming language design and implementation, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 223-233.
18. HUNDHAUSEN, C. D., AND BROWN, J. L. 2005. What you see is what you code: a radically dynamic algorithm visualization development model for novice learners. In IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, 163-170.
19. HUNDHAUSEN, C. D., AND BROWN, J. L. 2005. Personalizing and discussing algorithms within CS1 studio experiences: an observational study. In ICER '05: Proceedings of the 2005 international workshop on Computing education research, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 45-56.
20. HUNDHAUSEN, C. D., DOUGLAS, S. A., AND STASKO, J. T. 2002. A meta-study of algorithm visualization effectiveness. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 13, 3, 259-290.
21. JAIN, J., JAMES, HENDRIX, D. T., AND BAROWSKI, L. A. 2006. Experimental evaluation of animated-verifying object viewers for Java. In SoftVis '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Software visualization, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 27-36.
22. LUK, C.-K., COHN, R., MUTH, R., PATIL, H., KLAUSER, A., LOWNEY, G., WALLACE, S., REDDI, V. J., AND HAZELWOOD, K. 2005. Pin: building customized program analysis tools with dynamic instrumentation. SIGPLAN Not. 40, 6 (June), 190-200.
23. MORENO, A., MYLLER, N., SUTINEN, E., AND BEN-ARI, M. 2004. Visualizing programs with Jeliot 3. In AVI '04: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 373-376.
24. MUKHERJEA, S., AND STASKO, J. T. 1993. Applying algorithm animation techniques for program tracing, debugging, and understanding. In ICSE '93: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Software Engineering, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 456-465.
25. MUKHERJEA, S., AND STASKO, J. T. 1994. Toward visual debugging: integrating algorithm animation capabilities within a source-level debugger. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 1, 3 (September), 215-244.
26. MYERS, B. A., CHANDHOK, R., AND SAREEN, A. 1988. Automatic data visualization for novice Pascal programmers. In IEEE Workshop on Visual Languages, 192-198.
27. MYERS, B. A. 1983. INCENSE: a system for displaying data structures. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 17, 3 (July), 115-125.
28. OECHSLE, R., AND SCHMITT, T. 2002. JAVAVIS: automatic program visualization with object and sequence diagrams using the java debug interface (JDI). In Revised Lectures on Software Visualization, International Seminar, Springer-Verlag, London, UK, 176-190.
29. PRICE, B. A., BAECKER, R. M., AND SMALL, I. S. 1993. A principled taxonomy of software visualization. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing 4, 3 (September), 211-266.
30. REISS, S. P., AND RENIERIS, M. 2005. Jove: Java as it happens. In SoftVis '05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on Software visualization, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 115-124.
31. REISS, S. P. 1997. Cacti: a front end for program visualization. In INFOVlS '97: Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis '97), IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA.
32. REISS, S. P. 2003. Visualizing Java in action. In SoftVis '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Software visualization, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 57-65.
33. STASKO, J. T. 1990. Tango: A. framework and system for algorithm animation. SIGCHI Bull. 21, 3 (January), 59-60.
34. STASKO, J. T. 1997. Using student-built algorithm animations as learning aids. In SIGCSE '97: Proceedings of the twenty-eighth SlGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 25-29.
35. YATES, B. R. A., QUEZADA, G., AND VALMADRE, G. 1996. Visual debugging and automatic animation of C programs. In Software Visualisation, P. D. Eades and K. Zhang, Eds., vol. 7. World Scientific, Singapore, 46-58.
36. ZELLER, A., AND LÜTKEHAUS, D. 1996. DDD - a free graphical front-end for UNIX debuggers. SIGPLAN Not. 31, 1 (January), 22-27.