Work in progress - Assessing the engineering curriculum through Bloom's taxonomy

Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Cheville, Alan ^a   Yadav, Aman ^b   Subedi, Dipendra ^c   Lundeberg, Mary ^c  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bloom's taxonomy; Engineering program evaluation; Engineering taxonomy; Survey instrument

Indexed keywords

BLOOM'S TAXONOMY; BROAD SPECTRUMS; ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAMS; ENGINEERING CURRICULUMS; ENGINEERING DESIGNS; ENGINEERING PROGRAM EVALUATION; LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES; PROCESS-ORIENTED; RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES; SURVEY INSTRUMENT; VALIDATION PROCESS; WORK IN PROGRESS;

BLOOMS (METAL); CURRICULA; ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING; SURVEYS; TAXONOMIES;

ENGINEERING RESEARCH;

EID: 78650760059     PISSN: 15394565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2008.4720668     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2008-2009," Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Baltimore, MD 2009.
2. M. Besterfield-Sacre, et. al., B. M. Olds, and G. M. Rogers, "Defining the outcomes: A framework for EC-2000," IEEE Tranx Educ, vol. 43, pp. 100-110, 2000.
3. D. R. Krathwohl, "A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy; An Overview," Theory into Practice, vol. 41, 2002, pp. 212-218.
4. R. M. Ford and C. S. Coulston, Design for Electrical and Computer Engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007.
5. R. A. Cheville, "Engineering Students for the 21st Century Website," 2008. Accessible electronically at: http://es21c.okstate.edu/ resources/Engineering%20Taxonomy.html