Watch out for the preview: The effects of a preview on the usability of a Content Management System and on the users' confidence level

IEEE International Professional Communication Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Reddig, Daniela ^a   Karreman, Joyce ^b   Van Der Geest, Thea ^b  

^a Digital Ink Mediadesign ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Inexperienced users; Usability; Web site design

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENCE LEVEL (CL); CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (CMS); CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (CMS); HUMAN COMPUTER; INEXPERIENCED USERS; LOW GRADE; POSITIVE CORRELATIONS; SYSTEM DESIGNERS; USABILITY; WEB SITE DESIGN;

MANAGEMENT; QUEUEING NETWORKS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 78650759427     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Ovum. Advising on the commercial impact of technology and market changes in teleco ms, software and IT services. [Online]. Retrieved from: www.ovum.com. 2000
2. Noga, M., & F. Krüper. Optimizing Content Management System Pipelines, Separation and Merging of Concerns. Generative Programming and Component Engineering. Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN/SIGSOFT Conference, GPCE 2002, Pittsburgh. PA, USA. Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer, October 6-8, 252-267, 2002
3. Goodwin, S., & R. Vidgen. Content, content, everywhere... time to stop and think? The process of Web content management. Computing & Control Engineering Journal. 13(2): 66-70, 2002
4. Arora, N. & L. Pannan. Combining available standards and tools to build a compliance oriented website management system. Proceedings of The Eleventh Australian World Wide Web Conference. Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, 20-37, July 2005
5. Briti sh Standards Institution. Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals. BSI EN ISO 9241-11:1998. Part 11: Guidance on Usability. London: BSI, 1998
6. Stone, D., C. Jarrett, E.M. Wo odro, & S. Minocha. User Interface Design and Evaluation. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Verlag, 2005
7. Annett, J. The effects of knowledge of results, incentives, and reinforcement on training and performance. Feedback and human behaviour. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books, 1969
8. Farkas, D. K. The logical and rhetorical construction of procedural discourse. Technical Communication, 46(1), 42-54, 1999
9. K luger, A.N., & A. DeNisi. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(4): 254-284, 1996
10. Locke, E.A., & G.P. Latham. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice - Hall, 1990
11. Gellev ij, M., & H. van der Meij. Empirical proof for presenting screen captures in software documentation. Technical Communication, 51(2): 224-238, 2004
12. Loorbach, N., J. Karreman, & M. Steehouder. Adding motivational elements to an instruction manual for s eniors: Effects on usability and motivation. Technical Communication, 54(3), 343-358, 2007
13. Lewis, J.R. (1993). IBM Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaires: Psychometric Evaluation and Instructions for Use. IBM Technical Report, 54.786, 1993
14. Prümper, & J., M. Anft. Die Evaluation von Software auf Grundlage des Entwurf s zur internationalen Ergonomie-Norm ISO 9241 Teil 10 als Beitrag zur partizipativen Systemgestaltung - ein Fallbeispiel. In: K.-H. Rödiger, Software-Ergonomie '93. Stuttgart: Teubner, 145-156, 1993