The Effect of Cleaning Agents on the Ability to Obtain DNA Profiles Using the Identifiler™ and PowerPlex® Y Multiplex Kits

Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 181-185

  Bright, Jo Anne ^a   Cockerton, Sarah ^a   Harbison, SallyAnn ^a   Russell, Amanda ^a   Samson, Olivia ^a   Stevenson, Kate ^a  

^a MT ALBERT RESEARCH CENTRE   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Allelic dropout; DNA typing; Forensic science; Identifiler ; Inhibition; PowerPlex Y; TriGene

Indexed keywords

DETERGENT; DNA;

ARTICLE; DNA FINGERPRINTING; DRUG EFFECT; ELECTROPHORESIS; HUMAN; LABORATORY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; Y CHROMOSOME;

CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, Y; DETERGENTS; DNA; DNA FINGERPRINTING; ELECTROPHORESIS; HUMANS; LABORATORIES; MALE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

EID: 78650751648     PISSN: 00221198     EISSN: 15564029     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01564.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ® PCR Amplification Kit. J Forensic Sci 2006;49:1265-77.
2. Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. BioTechniques 1991;10:506-13.
3. ®2000 laboratory automation workstation and the DNA IQ™ system to the extraction of forensic casework samples. J Forensic Sci 2004;49:29-39.
4. Komonski DJ, Marignani A, Richard ML, Frappier JRH, Newman JC. Validation of the DNA IQ™ System for use in the DNA extraction of high volume forensic casework. Can Soc Forensic Sci J 2004;37:103-9.
5. Promega Corporation. DNA IQ™ System-database protocol. Madison, WI: Promega Corporation, 2002.
6. Promega Corporation. DNA IQ™ System-small sample casework protocol. Madison, WI: Promega Corporation, 2002.
7. Promega Corporation. Differex™ System technical bulletin No. D020. Madison, WI: Promega Corporation, 2006.
8. Abaz J, Walsh S, Moss D, Cullen J, Bright J, Crowe G, et al. Comparison of the variables affecting the recovery of DNA from common drinking containers. Forensic Sci Int 2002;126:233-40.
9. Bright J, Petricevic SF. Recovery of trace DNA and its application to DNA profiling of shoe insoles. Forensic Sci Int 2004;145(1):7-12.
10. Bushell D, Fallow F, Harbison SA. An analysis of the success rate of 908 trace DNA submitted to the Crime Sample Database in New Zealand. Aust J Forensic Sci 2008;40(1):49-53.
11. Green RL, Roinestad IC, Boland C, Hennessy LK. Developmental validation of the Quantifiler™ real time PCR kits for the quantification of human nuclear DNA samples. J Forensic Sci 2005;50:1-17.
12. Krenke BE, Viculis L, Richard ML, Prinz M, Milne SC, Ladd C, et al. Validation of a male specific, 12-locus fluorescent short tandem repeat (STR) multiplex. Forensic Sci Int 2004;148:1-14.
13. Power TEB, McCabe B, Harbison SA. FaSTR DNA: a new expert system for forensic DNA analysis. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2008;2:159-65.
14. Loreille OM, Diegoli TM, Irwin JA, Coble MD, Parsons TJ. High efficiency DNA extraction from bone by total demineralization. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2007;1:191-5.
15. Koukoulas I, O'Toole FE, Stringer P, Van Oorschot RAH. Quantifiler™ observations of relevance to forensic casework. J Forensic Sci 2008;53(1):135-41.
16. Heishi M, Hayashi K, Ichihara J, Ishikawa H, Kawamura T, Kanaoka M, et al. Comparison of gene expression changes induced by biguanides in db/db mice liver. J Toxicol Sci 2008;33:339-47.