A discussion of high-stakes testing: An extension of a 2009 INACSL conference roundtable

Clinical Simulation in Nursing

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Kardong Edgren, Suzie ^a   Hanberg, Allen D ^b   Keenan, Chris ^c   Ackerman, Andrea Andy ^d   Chambers, Kristy ^e  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

^d MOUNT SAINT MARY COLLEGE   (United States)

^e Medical Simulation Design Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation; High stakes testing; Nursing education

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650751029     PISSN: 18761399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecns.2010.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Abrams L., Madaus G. Lessons of high-stakes testing. Educational Leadership 2003, 6(3):31-35.
2. Alinier G. Pitfalls to avoid in designing and executing research with clinical simulation. Clinical simulation 2008, 515-516. Elsevier, San Diego, CA. R. Kyle, M. Bosseau (Eds.).
3. Benner B., Sutphen M., Leonard V., Day L. Educating nurses 2010, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
4. Berger L.R., Grossman D.C. Evaluating fidelity and effectiveness of interventions. Handbook of injury and violence prevention 2007, 463-478. Springer, New York. L.S. Doll, S.E. Bonzo, J.A. Mercy, D.A. Sleet (Eds.).
5. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, (2008). Airline Data and Statistics. Retrieved October 24, 2009 from http://www.bts.gov/programs/airline_information.
6. Crotty M. The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process 1998, Sage, London.
7. Dickieson P., Carter L., Walsh M. Integrative thinking and learning in undergraduate nursing education: Three strategies. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship 2008, 5(1). article 39.
8. Forbes M., Hickey M. Curriculum reform in baccalaureate nursing education: Review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship 2009, 6(1). article 27.
9. Gunzenhauser M. High stakes testing and the default philosophy of education. Theory Into Practice 2003, 42(1):51-58. Retrieved February 18, 2010, from. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_into_practice/v042/42.1gunzenhauser.html.
10. Jones G.M., Jones B.D., Hardin B., Chapman L., Yarborough T., Davis M. The impact of high-stakes testing on teachers and students in North Carolina. Phi Delta Kappan 1999, 83(8):601-605.
11. Kirkpatrick D. Evaluating training programs: The four levels 1994, Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco.
12. Kohn L., Corrigan J., Donaldson M. To err is human: Building a safer health system 1999, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
13. McGaghie W.C., Issenberg S.B., Petrusa E.R., Scalese R.J. Effect of practice on standardized learning outcomes in simulation-based medical education. Medical Education 2006, 40:792-797.
14. McNelis, A., & Ironside, P. (2009). National survey on clinical education in prelicensure nursing education programs. In N. Ard & T. Valiga (Eds.), Clinical nursing education: Current reflections (pp. 25-38) New York: National League for Nursing.
15. Nance J. Why hospitals should fly 2008, Second River Healthcare Press, Bozeman, MT.
16. Powers, B.R. (2007). The use of interacitve instructional strategies on academic performance on nurse education programs. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts-Lowell.
17. Rogers C.R., Freiberg H.J. Freedom to learn 1994, Merrill, Columbus, OH. 3rd ed.
18. Spiro R.J., Feltovich P.L., Jacobson M.J., Coulson R.L. Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Constructivism and technology of instruction: A conversation 1992, 57-76. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. T.M. Duffy, D. Jonassen (Eds.).