The Lessons of High-Stakes Testing

Educational Leadership

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 31-35

  Abrams, Lisa M ^a   Madaus, George F ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345359846     PISSN: 00131784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Airasian, P. W. (1988). Symbolic validation: The case of state-mandated, high-stakes testing. Educational Evaluation and Policy Archives, 10(4), 301-313.
2. Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2002). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(18). [Online]. Available: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n18
3. Edwards, V. (Ed.). (2003, Jan. 9). Quality Counts 2003; If I can't learn from you... (Education Week Special Report), 12(17). Bethesda, MD: Editorial Projects in Education.
4. Goldhaber, D., & Hannaway, J. (2001). Accountability with a kicker: Observations on the Florida A+ Plan. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Public Policy and Management, Washington, DC.
5. Haladyna, T., Nolen, S., & Haas, N. (1991). Raising standardized achievement test scores and the origins of test score pollution. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 2-7.
6. Hamilton, L., Stecher, B., & Klein, S. (Eds). (2002). Making sense of test-based accountability in education. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
7. Harlow, A., & Jones, A. (2003, July). Why students answer TIMSS science test items the way they do. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Science Education Research Association, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
8. Herman, J., & Golan, S. (n.d.). Effects of standardized testing on teachers and learning (CSE Technical Report 334). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
9. Herszenhorn, D. (2003, July 23). Basic skills forcing cuts in art classes. The New York Times, p. B1.
10. Hoffman, J., Assaf, L., & Paris, S. (2001). High-stakes testing in reading: Today in Texas, tomorrow? The Reading Teacher, 54(5), 482-494.
11. Holmes, E. (1911). What is and what might be: A study of education in general and elementary in particular. London: Constable.
12. Horn, C., Ramos, M., Blumer, I., & Madaus, G. (2000). Cut scores: Results may vary. Chestnut Hill, MA: National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy, Boston College.
13. Jones, M., Jones, B., Hardin B., Chapman, L., Yarbough, T., & Davis, M. (1999). The impact of high-stakes testing on teachers and students in North Carolina. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(3), 199-203.
14. Klein, S., Hamilton, L., McCaffrey, D., & Stecher, B. (2000). What do test scores in Texas tell us? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(49). [Online], Available: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n49
15. Koretz, D., Barron, S., Mitchell, K., & Keith, S. (1996a). Perceived effects of the Kentucky instructional results information system (KIRIS) (MR-792-PCT/FF). Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
16. Koretz, D., Barron, S., Mitchell, K., & Keith, S. (1996b). Perceived effects of the Maryland school performance assessment program (CSE Technical Report 409). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
17. Linn, R. (1998). Assessments and accountability (CSE Technical Report 490). Boulder, CO: CRESST/University of Colorado at Boulder.
18. Madaus, G. (1988). The influence of testing on the curriculum. In L. Tanner (Ed.), Critical issues in curriculum (pp. 83-121). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Madaus, G. (1991, January). The effects of important tests on students: Implications for a national examination or system of examinations. Paper prepared for the American Educational Research Association Invitational Conference on Accountability as a State Reform Instrument, Washington, DC.
20. Madaus, G., & O'Dwyer, L. (1999). A short history of performance assessment: Lessons learned. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(9), 688-695.
21. McMillan, J., Myran, S., & Workman, D. (1999, April 19-23). The impact of mandated statewide testing on teachers' classroom assessment and instructional practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
22. Myers, K. (2003, July 16). A dream denied: Aspiring chef rethinks her future as Falmouth school board bows to state pressure on MCAS. Cape Cod Times. Available: www.capecodonline.com
23. National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Digest of educational statistics 2001. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
24. Pedulla, J., Abrams, L., Madaus, G., Russell, M., Ramos, M., & Miao, J. (2003). Perceived effects of state-mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Findings from a national survey of teachers. Chestnut Hill, MA: National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy, Boston College.
25. Rhoades, K., & Madaus, G. (2003). Errors in standardized tests: A systemic problem. Chestnut Hill, MA: National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy, Boston College.
26. Russell, M., & Abrams, L. (in press). Instructional uses of computers for writing: The impact of state testing programs. Teachers College Record.
27. Stecher, B., Barron, S., Chun, T., & Ross, K. (2000). The effects of the Washington state education reform on schools and classrooms (CSE Technical Report 525). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
28. Taylor, G., Shepard, L., Kinner, F., & Rosenthal, J. (2003). A survey of teachers' perspectives on high-stakes testing in Colorado: What gets taught, what gets lost (CSE Technical Report 588). Los Angeles: CRESST.
29. Winerip, M. (2003, July 23). Rigidity in Florida and the results. The New York Times, p. B9.