Correlation between acoustic rhinometry and subjective nasal patency during nasal challenge test in subjects with suspected occupational rhinitis; a prospective controlled study

Clinical Otolaryngology

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 462-467

  Castano, R ^a   Trudeau, C ^a   Ghezzo, H ^a  

^a HÔPITAL DU SACRÉ COEUR DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASTHMA; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NOSE CONGESTION; OCCUPATION; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RHINITIS; RHINOMETRY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

HUMANS; NASAL PROVOCATION TESTS; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RHINITIS; RHINOMETRY, ACOUSTIC; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 78650746600     PISSN: 17494478     EISSN: 17494486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2010.02223.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Andre R.F., Vuyk H.D., Ahmed A. et al. (2009) Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway. A systematic review of the highest level of evidence. Clin. Otolaryngol. 34, 518-525
2. Phipatanakul W., Kesavanathan J., Eggleston P.A. et al. (1998) The value of acoustic rhinometry in assessing nasal responses to cat exposure. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 102, 896-901
3. Moscato G., Vandenplas O., Gerth V.W. et al. (2008) Occupational rhinitis. Allergy 63, 969-980
4. Castano R., Gautrin D., Theriault G. et al. (2009) Occupational rhinitis in workers investigated for occupational asthma. Thorax 64, 50-54
5. Gosepath J., Amedee R.G. & Mann W.J. (2005) Nasal provocation testing as an international standard for evaluation of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. Laryngoscope 115, 512-516
6. Moscato G., Vandenplas O., Van Wijk R.G. et al. (2009) EAACI position paper on occupational rhinitis. Respir. Res. 10, 16
7. Nathan R.A., Eccles R., Howarth P.H. et al. (2005) Objective monitoring of nasal patency and nasal physiology in rhinitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 115 (3 Suppl. 1), S442-S459
8. Scadding G.K., Darby Y.C. & Austin C.E. (1994) Acoustic rhinometry compared with anterior rhinomanometry in the assessment of the response to nasal allergen challenge. Clin. Otolaryngol. Allied Sci. 19, 451-454
9. Vandenplas O. & Malo J.L. (1997) Inhalation challenges with agents causing occupational asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 10, 2612-2629
10. Hilberg O. & Pedersen O.F. (2000) Acoustic rhinometry: recommendations for technical specifications and standard operating procedures. Rhinol. Suppl. 16, 3-17
11. Castano R., Theriault G., Gautrin D. et al. (2007) Reproducibility of acoustic rhinometry in the investigation of occupational rhinitis. Am. J. Rhinol. 21, 474-477
12. Lane A.P., Zweiman B., Lanza D.C. et al. (1996) Acoustic rhinometry in the study of the acute nasal allergic response. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 105, 811-818
13. Kesavanathan J., Swift D.L., Fitzgerald T.K. et al. (1996) Evaluation of acoustic rhinometry and posterior rhinomanometry as tools for inhalation challenge studies. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 48, 295-307
14. Larsson C., Millqvist E. & Bende M. (2001) Relationship between subjective nasal stuffiness and nasal patency measured by acoustic rhinometry. Am. J. Rhinol. 15, 403-405