Genetic diversity among common bean (phaseolus vulgaris L.) Greek landraces and commercial cultivars: Nutritional components, RAPD and morphological markers;Diversidad genética entre variedades autóctonas de alubia (phaseolus vulgaris L.) en Grecia y cultivares comerciales: Componentes nutricionales, marcadores morfológicos y RAPD

Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 986-994

  Mavromatis, A G ^a   Arvanitoyannis, I S ^a   Korkovelos, A E ^a   Giakountis, A ^b   Chatzitheodorou, V A ^a   Goulas, C K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY   (Greece)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dry bean; Genetic relationships; Organic farming; Physicochemical properties

Indexed keywords

PHASEOLUS VULGARIS;

EID: 78650699670     PISSN: 1695971X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2010084-1245     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ÁLVAREZ M.T., SÁENZ-DE-MIERA L.E., PÉREZ DE LA VEGA M., 1998. Genetic variation in common and runner bean of the Northern Meseta in Spain. Genet Resour Crop Evol 45, 243-251.
2. ARVANITOYANNIS I.S., KHAH E.M., 2003. Effect of storage on physicochemical and sensory quality criteria of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars Montano and Larma produced under different fertilizer regimes. Appl Biotechnol Food Sci Policy 1(3), 175-187.
3. BEEBE S.E., OCHOA I., SKROCH P., NIENHUIS J., TIVANG J., 1995. Genetic diversity among common bean breeding lines developed for Central America. Crop Sci 35, 1178-1183.
4. BEEBE S., SKROCH P.W., TOMHE J., DUQUE M.C., PEDRAZA F., NIENHUIS J., 2000. Structure of genetic diversity among common bean landraces of Middle American origin based on correspondence analysis of RAPD. Crop Sci 40, 264-273.
5. BISHNOI S., KHETARPAUL N., 1993. Variability in physicochemical properties and nutrient components of different pea cultivars. Food Chem 47(4), 371-373.
6. CASAÑAS F., BOSCH L., PUJOLA M., SÁNCHEZ E., SORRIBAS X., BALDI M., NUEZ F., 1999. Characteristics of a common bean landrace (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of great culinary value and selection of a commercial inbred line. J Sci Food Agr 79, 693-698.
7. CIAT, 1987. Standard system for the evaluation of bean germplasm (Van Schoonhoven A., Pastor-Corrales M.A., compilers). CIAT, Cali, Colombia. 54 pp.
8. DICE L.R., 1945. Measures of the amount of ecological associations between species. Ecology 26, 297-303.
9. DOYLE J.J., DOYLE J.L., 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12, 13-15.
10. ESCRIBANO M.R., SANTALLA M., DE RON A.M., 1997. Genetic diversity in pod and seed qualiy traits of common bean populations from Northwestern Spain. Euphytica 93, 71-81.
11. GALVAN M.Z., MENÉNDEZ-SEVILLANO M.C., DE RON A.M., SANTALLA M. BALATTI P.A., 2006. Genetic diversity among wild common beans from Northwestern Argentina based on morphoagronomic and RAPD data. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53, 891-900.
12. GRAHAM P.H., RANALLI P., 1997. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Field Crops Res 53, 131-146.
13. JACCARD P., 1908. Nouveles recherches sur la distribution florale. Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 44, 223-270. [In French].
14. KELLY J.D., BLISS F.A., 1975. Heritability estimates of percentage seed protein and available methionine and correlations with yield in dry beans. Crop Sci 15, 753-757.
15. MAROTTI I., BONETTI A., MINELLI M., CATIZONE P., DINELLI G., 2007. Characterization of some Italian common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces by RAPD, semi-random and ISSR molecular markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54, 175-188.
16. MAVROMATIS A., GOULAS C., KALLIMOPOULOS K., GIAKOUNTIS A., KORKOVELOS A., 2004. Genetic variability among and within dry bean local landraces: field and molecu lar data. In: Genetic variation for plantbreeding. EUCARPIA (Vollmann J., Grausgruber H., Ruckernbauer P., eds). Austria. 154 pp.
17. MAVROMATIS A.G., ARVANITOYANNIS I.S., CHATZITHEODOROU V.A., KHAH E.M., KORKOVELOS A.E., GOULAS C.K., 2007. Landraces vs commercial common bean cultivars under organic growing conditions: a comparative study based on agronomic performance and physicochemical traits. Eur J Hortic Sci 72(5), 214-219.
18. METAIS I., AUBRY C., HAMON B., JALOUZOT R., PELTIER D., 2000. Description and analysis of genetic diversity between commercial bean lines (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet 101, 1207-1214.
19. NEGRI V., TOSTI N., 2002. Phaseolus genetic diversity maintained on farm in central Italy. Gen Resour Crop Evol 47, 141-146.
20. NIENHUIS J., SINGH P.S., 1986. Combining ability and relationships among yield, yield components and architectural traits in dry bean. Crop Sci 26, 21-27.
21. PAPA R., NANNI L., SICARD D., 2006. The evolution of genetic diversity in Phaseolus vulgaris L. In: Darwin's harvest: new approaches to the origins, evolution, andconservation of crops (Motley T.J., Zerega, N., Cross H., eds). Columbia Univ Press, NY. pp. 121-142.
22. PIERGIOVANNI A.R., CERBINO D., GATTA C.D., 2000. Diversity in seed quality of common bean populations from Basilicata (Southern Italy). Plant Breeding 119, 513-516.
23. ROLF F.J., 1998. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system ver. 2.02. Applied Biostatics Inc, NY. SCHAFFER H.E., SEDEROFF R.R., 1981. Improved estimation of DNAN fragment lengths from agarose gels. Anal Biochem 115, 113-122.
24. SKROCH P.W., NIENHUIS J., 1995. Qualitative and quantitative characterization of RAPD variation among snap bean genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet 91, 1078-1085.
25. SINGH P.S., 2001. Broadening the genetic base of common bean cultivars. Crop Sci 41, 1659-1675.
26. SNEATH P.H., SOKAL R.R., 1973. Numerical taxonomy. Ed Freeman, San Francisco, USA. 573 pp.
27. STEEL R.G.D., TORRIE J.H., 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, NY. 633 pp.