Cognitive interference from food cues in weight loss maintainers, normal weight, and obese individuals

Obesity

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 69-73

  Phelan, Suzanne ^a   Hassenstab, Jason ^b   McCaffery, Jeanne M ^b   Sweet, Lawrence ^b,c   Raynor, Hollie A ^a   Cohen, Ronald A ^b   Wing, Rena R ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIETARY INTAKE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD INTAKE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; LOW CALORY DIET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE CELL NETWORK; OBESITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POST HOC ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME; TIME; WEIGHT CONTROL; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

ADULT; APPETITE REGULATION; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COGNITION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IDEAL BODY WEIGHT; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE NET; OBESITY; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; WEIGHT LOSS;

EID: 78650678066     PISSN: 19307381     EISSN: 1930739X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2010.138     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Phelan S, Lang W, Jordan D, Wing RR. Use of artificial sweeteners and fat-modified foods in weight loss maintainers and always-normal weight individuals. Int J Obes (Lond) 2009;33:1183-1190.
2. Phelan S, Roberts M, Lang W, Wing RR. Empirical evaluation of physical activity recommendations for weight control in women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007;39:1832-1836.
3. Klem ML, Wing RR, McGuire M T, Seagle HM, Hill JO. A descriptive study of individuals successful at long-term maintenance of substantial weight loss. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;66:239-246.
4. Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Kempen K P, Saris WH. Determinants of weight maintenance in women after diet-induced weight reduction. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998;22:1-6.
5. Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Experimenl Psychol 1935;18:643-662.
6. Williams JM, Mathews A, MacLeod C. The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychol Bull 1996;120:3-24.
7. Overduin J, Jansen A, Louwerse E. Stroop interference and food intake. Int J Eat Disord 1995;18:277-285.
8. Perpiñá C, Hemsley D, Treasure J, de Silva P. Is the selective information processing of food and body words specific to patients with eating disorders? Int J Eat Disord 1993;14:359-366.
9. Johansson L, Lundh L-G, Andersson G. Attentional bias for negative self-words in young women: The role of thin ideal priming and body shape dissatisfaction. Personality Indiv Diff 2005;38:723-733.
10. Ben-Tovim DI, Walker MK. Further evidence for the Stroop Test as a quantitative measure of psychopathology in eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord 1991;10:609-613.
11. Francis JA, Stewart SH, Hounsell S. Dietary restraint and the selective processing forbidden and nonforbidden food words. Cog Ther Res 1997;21:633-646.
12. Green MW, Rogers PJ. Selective attention to food and body shape words in dieters and restrained nondieters. Int J Eat Disord 1993;14:515-517.
13. Long CG, Hinton C, Gillespie NK. Selective processing of food and body size words: application of the Stroop Test with obese restrained eaters, anorexics, and normals. Int J Eat Disord 1994;15:279-283.
14. Markus H, Hamill R, Sentis K P. Thinking fat: Self-schemas for body weight and the processing of weight relevant information. J Applied Soc Psychol 1987;17:50-71.
15. Wing RR, Phelan S. Long-term weight loss maintenance. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82:222S-225S.
16. McCaffery JM, Haley A P, Sweet LH et al. Differential functional magnetic resonance imaging response to food pictures in successful weight-loss maintainers relative to normal-weight and obese controls. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;90:928-934.
17. Golden C. Stroop Color and Word Test. Stoelting: Chicago, 1978.
18. Stunkard AJ, Messick S. The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res 1985;29: 71-83.
19. Allison DB, Kalinsky LB, Gorman BS. A comparison of the psychometric properties of three measures of dietary restraint. Psychol Assess 1992;4:391-398.
20. Lansbergen MM, Kenemans JL, van Engeland H. Stroop interference and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychology 2007;21:251-262.
21. Faunce GJ. Eating disorders and attentional bias: a review. Eat Disord 2002;10:125-139.
22. Vasey MW, MacLeod C. Information-processing factors in childhood anxiety: A review and developmental perspective. In: Vasey MW, Dadds MR (eds). The Developmental Psychopathology of Anxiety. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, 2001, pp 253-277.
23. Tiffany ST. A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychol Rev 1990;97:147-168.
24. Lavy E, Van den Hout M. Selective attention evidenced by pictorial and linguistic Stroop tasks. Behav Ther 1993;24:645-657.
25. Ben-Tovim DI, Walker MK, Fok D, Yap E. An adaptation of the Stroop Test for measuring shape and food concerns in eating disorders: A quantitative measure of psychopathology? Int J Eat Disord 1989;8:681-687.
26. Boon B, Vogelzang L, Jansen A. Do restrained eaters show attention toward or away from food, shape and weight stimuli? Euro Eat Disord Rev 2000;8:51-58.
27. MacLeod C, Mathews A, Tata P. Attentional bias in emotional disorders. J Abnorm Psychol 1986;95:15-20.
28. MacLeod C, Mathews A. Anxiety and the allocation of attention to threat. Q J Exp Psychol A 1988;40:653-670.
29. Posner MI. Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 1980;32:3-25.
30. Draycott S, Dabbs A. Cognitive dissonance. 1: An overview of the literature and its integration into theory and practice in clinical psychology. Br J Clin Psychol 1998;37 (Pt 3):341-353.
31. Elliot A, Carlsmith JM. Effect of the severity of threat on the devaluation of forbidden behavior. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 1963;66:584.
32. Dalgleish T. Performance on thee motional Stroop task in groups of anxious, expert and control subjects: A comparison of computer and card presentation formats. Cog Emotion 1995;9:341-362.
33. Klinger E. The contents of thoughts: Interference as the downside of adaptive normal mechanisms in thought flow. In: Sarason IG, Pierce GR, Sarason BR (eds). Cognitive Interference: Theories, Methods & Findings. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, 1996, pp 3-22.
34. Channon S, Hayward A. The effect of short-term fasting on processing of food cues in normal subjects. Int J Eat Disord 1990;9:447-452.
35. Stewart SH, Samoluk SB. Effects of short-term food deprivation and chronic dietary restraint on the selective processing of appetitive-related cues. Int J Eat Disord 1997;21:129-135.
36. Green MW, Rogers PJ. Impairments in working memory associated with spontaneous dieting behaviour. Psychol Med 1998;28:1063-1070.