The development of future time expressions in Late Modern English: Redistribution of forms or change in discourse?

English Language and Linguistics

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 163-186

  Nesselhauf, Nadja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650657379     PISSN: 13606743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1360674310000043     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Atkinson, Dwight. 1996. The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975: A sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society 25, 333-71.
2. Berglund, Ylva. 2005. Expressions of future in present-day English: A corpus-based approach. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.
3. Biber, Douglas. 2004. Modal use across registers and time. In Anne Curzan & Kimberly Emmons (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language II: Unfolding conversations, 189-216. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
4. Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. 1997. Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In Terttu Nevalainen & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds.), To explain the present: Studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen, 253-75. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
5. CIDE = Cambridge International Dictionary of English. 1995. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Danchev, Andrei, A. Pavlova, M. Nalchadjan & O. Zlatareva. 1965. The construction going to + inf. in Modern English. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 13, 375-86.
7. Danchev, Andrei & Merja Kytö. 1994. The construction be going to + infinitive in Early Modern English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, 58-77. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
8. Denison, David. 1998. Syntax. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. IV: 1776-1997, 92-329. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Fries, Charles Carpenter. 1925. The periphrastic future with shall and will in Modern English. Publications of the Modern Language Association 40(4), 963-1024.
10. Görlach, Manfred. 1999. English in nineteenth-century England: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Gotti, Maurizio. 2003. Shall and will in contemporary English: A comparison with past uses. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Palmer (eds.), Modality in contemporary English, 267-300. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
12. Gotti, Maurizio, Marina Dossena, Richard Dury & Roberta Facchinetti. 2002. Variation in central modals: A repertoire of forms and type of usage in Middle English and Early Modern English. Bern: Peter Lang.
13. Kytö, Merja. 1991. Variation and diachrony, with Early American English in focus. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
14. Leech, Geoffrey. 2003. Modality on the move: The English modal auxiliaries 1961-1992. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug and Frank Palmer (eds.), Modality in contemporary English, 223-40. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
15. Leech, Geoffrey. 2004. Meaning and the English verb. 3rd edition. Harlow: Longman.
16. Mair, Christian. 1997. The spread of the going-to-future in written English: A corpus-based investigation into language change in progress. In Raymond Hickey & Stanislaw Puppel (eds.), Language history and linguistic modelling, 1537-43. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
17. Mair, Christian. 2004. Corpus linguistics and grammaticalisation theory: Statistics, frequencies, and beyond. In Hans Lindquist & Christian Mair (eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalisation in English, 121-50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Mair, Christian. 2006. Twentieth-century English: History, variation, and standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Nesselhauf, Nadja. 2006. The decline of be to and the rise of be going to in Late Modern English: Connection or coincidence? In Christoph Houswitschka, Gabriele Knappe & Anja Müller (eds.), Anglistentag 2005 Bamberg. Proceedings, 515-29. Trier: WVT.
20. Nesselhauf, Nadja. 2007. The spread of the progressive and its 'future' use. English Language and Linguistics 11(1), 193-209.
21. Nesselhauf, Nadja. In prep. Language change and discourse change: Future time expressions in Late Modern English.
22. Núñez Pertejo, Paloma. 1999. Be going to + infinitive: origin and development: Some relevant cases from the Helsinki Corpus. Studia Neophilologica 71(2), 135-42.
23. OALD = Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English. 2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. OED = Oxford English Dictionary. 1989. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Pérez, Aveline. 1990. Time in motion: Grammaticalisation of the be going to construction in English. La Trobe Working Papers in Linguistics 3, 49-64.
26. Smith, Nicholas. 2005. A corpus-based investigation of recent change in the use of the progressive in British English. PhD thesis, Lancaster University.