A multiple software approach to understanding values

Journal of Beliefs and Values

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 283-298

  Hansson, Thomas ^a   Carey, Greg ^b   Kjartansson, Rafn ^c  

^a BLEKINGE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AKUREYRI   (Iceland)

Author keywords

qualitative study; social science; software method; values

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650637753     PISSN: 13617672     EISSN: 14699362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13617672.2010.521005     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Brannen, J. 2009. Mixed methods for novice researchers: Reflections and themes. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 9, no. 3: 8-12.
2. Chenail, R., S. St. George, D. Wulff, M. Duffy, M. Laughlin, K. Warner, and T. Sahni. 2007. Mentoring qualitative research authors globally: 'The Qualitative Report' experience. The Qualitative Report 12, no. 1: 67-81.
3. Faludi, S. 2007. The terror dream: Fear and fantasy in post 9/11 America. New York: Metropolitan Books.
4. Festinger, L. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University.
5. Fisk, K., A. Cherney, M. Hornsey, and A.E. Smith. 2009. Rebuilding institutional legitimacy in post-conflict societies: An Asia pacific case study - Phase 1A, The University of Queensland. Report on grant funded by AFOSR/AOARD (FA2386-08-1-4094).
6. Giroux, H. 2003. Public spaces: Democracy beyond 9/11. Private lives. Oxford: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
7. Greenberg, J., S. Solomon, M. Veeder, D. Lyon, T. Pyszczynski, A. Rosenblatt, and S. Kirkland. 1990. Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58, no. 2: 308-18.
8. Greene, G., and S. Freed. 2005. Research as improvisation: Dancing among perspectives. The Qualitative Report 10, no. 2: 276-88.
9. Greenwood, D., and M. Levin. 1998. Introduction to action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Hansson, T. 2010. Tracking values in web based student teacher exchanges. International Journal of Information Technology and the Systems Approach 3, no. 2: 1-16.
11. Hunston, S. 2002. Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Kant, I. 1908. The educational theory of Immanuel Kant. London: J.B. Lippincott.
13. Lajoie, S., and S.J. Derry. 1993. Computers as cognitive tools. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Laughlin, M. 1995. The narcissistic researcher: A personal view. The Qualitative Report 2, no. 2. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR2-2/laughlin.html.
15. Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Leech, N., A. Onwuegbuzie, T. Hansson, and P. Robinson. 2008. Teaching mixed method: Call for papers. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches: http://mra.econtentmanagement.com/archives/vol/4/issue/1/marketing.
17. Lewis, J., and J. Ritchie. 2003. Generalizing from qualitative research. In Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, ed. J. Ritchie and J. Lewis, 263-86. London: Sage.
18. Lincoln, Y.S. 2002. On the nature of qualitative evidence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, November, in Sacramento, California.
19. Littlefield, M. 2009. Constructing the organ of deceit: The rhetoric of fMRI and brain finger-printing in post-9/11 America. Science, Technology & Human Values 34: 365-92.
20. McEnery, T., and A. Wilson. 2004. Corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
21. Miles, M.B., and A.M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
22. Niglas, K. 2009. How the novice researcher can make sense of mixed methods designs. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 9, no. 3: 34-46.
23. Onwuegbuzie, T., and N. Leech. 2004. Enhancing the interpretation of 'significant' findings: The role of mixed methods research. The Qualitative Report 9, no. 4: 770-92.
24. Onwuegbuzie, T., and N. Leech. 2007. Sampling designs in qualitative research: Making the sampling process more public. The Qualitative Report 12, no. 2: 238-54.
25. Ortlipp, M. 2008. Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report 13, no. 4: 695-705.
26. Ozkan, B. 2004. Using NVivo to analyze qualitative classroom data on constructivist learning environments. The Qualitative Report 9, no. 4: 589-603.
27. Schwartz, S.H. 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 25, ed. M. Zanna, 1-65. New York: Academic Press.
28. Senne, T.A., and G.L. Rikard. 2002. Experiencing the portfolio process during the internship: A comparative analysis of two PETE portfolio models. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 21: 309-36.
29. Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in society. Trans. M. Cole. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://www.comnet.ca/~pballan/ ProblemsofMethod(Vygotsky,1978).htm.
30. Watt, D. 2007. On becoming a qualitative researcher: The value of reflexivity. The Qualitative Report 12, no. 1: 82-101.
31. Wickham, M., and M. Woods. 2005. Reflecting on the strategic use of CAQDAS to manage and report on the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report 10, no. 4: 687-702.
32. Wilson, B.J. 1994. A challenge to communication empiricists: Let's be more forthcoming about what we do. Western Journal of Communication 58, no. 1: 25-31.
33. Witcher, A.E., A.J. Onwuegbuzie, K.M.T. Collins, J. Filer, and C. Wiedmaier. 2003. Students' perceptions of characteristics of effective college teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Biloxi, MS.
34. Wylie, A. 2002. Thinking from things: Essays in the philosophy of archaeology. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
35. Yaroshevsky, M. 1989. Lev Vygotsky. Trans. S. Syrovatkin. Moscow: Progress.