Impact of a rub and rinse on solution-induced corneal staining

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 87, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1030-1036

  Peterson, Rachael C ^a   Fonn, Desmond ^a   Woods, Craig A ^a   Jones, Lyndon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

care regime; contact lens; corneal staining; multipurpose solution; rub and rinse; sodium fluorescein; subjective grading

Indexed keywords

CARE REGIME; CORNEAL STAINING; MULTIPURPOSE SOLUTION; RUB AND RINSE; SUBJECTIVE GRADING;

CONTACT LENSES; DYES; SODIUM;

OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS;

BALAFILCON A; BIGUANIDE DERIVATIVE; CONTACT LENS SOLUTION; DISINFECTANT AGENT; POLY(HEXAMETHYLENEBIGUANIDE); SILICONE DERIVATIVE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; LAVAGE; MASSAGE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PRIMARY PREVENTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STAINING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIGUANIDES; CONTACT LENS SOLUTIONS; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CORNEA; DISINFECTANTS; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; HUMANS; HYDROGELS; MASSAGE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIMARY PREVENTION; SILICONES; STAINING AND LABELING; THERAPEUTIC IRRIGATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650619071     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ff9b6a     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Poggio EC, Glynn RJ, Schein OD, Seddon JM, Shannon MJ, Scardino VA, Kenyon KR. The incidence of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended-wear soft contact lenses. N Engl J Med 1989;321:779-83.
2. Brennan NA, Coles ML, Comstock TL, Levy B. A 1-year prospective clinical trial of balafilcon A (PureVision) silicone-hydrogel contact lenses used on a 30-day continuous wear schedule. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1172-7.
3. Radford CF, Minassian D, Dart JK, Stapleton F, Verma S. Risk factors for nonulcerative contact lens complications in an ophthalmic accident and emergency department: a case-control study. Ophthalmology 2009;116:385-92.
4. Stapleton F. Contact lens-related microbial keratitis: what can epidemiologic studies tell us? Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S85-9.
5. Claydon BE, Efron N. Non-compliance in contact lens wear. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1994;14:356-64.
6. Weissman BA, Mondino BJ. Risk factors for contact lens associated microbial keratitis. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2002;25:3-9.
7. Dart JK, Radford CF, Minassian D, Verma S, Stapleton F. Risk factors for microbial keratitis with contemporary contact lenses: a case-control study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1647-54.
8. Stapleton F, Keay L, Jalbert I, Cole N. The epidemiology of contact lens related infiltrates. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:257-72.
9. Rosenthal RA, Sutton SV, Schlech BA. Review of standard for evaluating the effectiveness of contact lens disinfectants. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol 2002;56:37-50.
10. Guillon M, Maissa C. Clinical acceptance of two multipurpose solutions: MPS containing HPMC versus citrate-based MPS without rubbing. CLAO J 2002;28:186-91.
11. Mok KH, Cheung RW, Wong BK, Yip KK, Lee VW. Effectiveness of no-rub contact lens cleaning on protein removal: a pilot study. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:468-70.
12. Stiegmeier MJ. Solution drops digital cleaning step. Contact Lens Spectrum 2000;15:45-7.
13. Jones L, MacDougall N, Sorbara LG. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone-hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanide-preserved care regimen. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:753-61.
14. Morgan PB, Maldonado-Codina C. Corneal staining: do we really understand what we are seeing? Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009;32: 48-54.
15. Carnt N, Willcox MD, Evans V, Naduvilath TJ, Tilia D, Papas EB, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. Corneal staining: the IER matrix study. Contact Lens Spectrum 2007;22:38-43.
16. Sweeney D, Holden B, Evans K, Ng V, Cho P. Best practice contact lens care: a review of the Asia Pacific Contact Lens Care Summit. Clin Exp Optom 2009;92:78-89.
17. Garofalo RJ, Dassanayake N, Carey C, Stein J, Stone R, David R. Corneal staining and subjective symptoms with multipurpose solutions as a function of time. Eye Contact Lens 2005;31:166-74.
18. Andrasko G, Ryen K. Corneal staining and comfort observed with traditional and silicone hydrogel lenses and multipurpose solution combinations. Optometry 2008;79:444-54.
19. Carnt N, Evans V, Holden BA, Naduvilath TJ, Tilia D, Papas EB, Willcox MD. IER matrix update: adding another silicone hydrogel. Contact Lens Spectrum 2008;23:40-3.
20. Ward KW. Superficial punctate fluorescein staining of the ocular surface. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:8-16.
21. Mowrey-McKee M, Sills A, Wright A. Comparative cytotoxicity potential of soft contact lens care regimens. CLAO J 2002;28:160-4.
22. Cavet ME, Harrington KL, VanDerMeid KR, Ward KW, Zhang JZ. Comparison of the effect of multipurpose contact lens solutions on the viability of cultured corneal epithelial cells. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009;32:171-5.
23. Woods J, Woods CA, Varikooty J, Jones LW, Simpson TL, Fonn D. A novel method of recording corneal staining that facilitates parametric analysis. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:E-abstract 065153.
24. Sorbara L, Peterson R, Woods C, Fonn D. Multipurpose disinfecting solutions and their interactions with a silicone hydrogel lens. Eye Contact Lens 2009;35:92-7.
25. Shih KL, Hu J, Sibley M. The microbiological benefit of cleaning and rinsing contact lenses. Int Contact Lens Clin 1985;12:235-42.
26. Cho P, Cheng SY, Chan WY, Yip WK. Soft contact lens cleaning: rub or no-rub? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2009;29:49-57.
27. Kilvington S, Lonnen J. A comparison of regimen methods for the removal and inactivation of bacteria, fungi and Acanthamoeba from two types of silicone hydrogel lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009; 32:73-7.
28. Saville JT, Zhao Z, Willcox MD, Blanksby SJ, Mitchell TW. Detection and quantification of tear phospholipids and cholesterol in contact lens deposits: the effect of contact lens material and lens care solution. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:2843-51.
29. Nichols JJ. Deposition rates and lens care influence on galyfilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:751-7.
30. Johnson C, Kohler N, Bean B, Caroline P, Smythe J. Rub vs. no rub: what are the costs? Contact Lens Spectrum 2002;17:24-20.
31. Gorbet MB, Tanti NC, Jones L, Sheardown H. Corneal epithelial cell biocompatibility to silicone hydrogel and conventional hydrogel contact lens packaging solutions. Mol Vis 2010;16:272-82.
32. Barabino S, Rolando M, Camicione P, Chen W, Calabria G. Effects of a 0.9% sodium chloride ophthalmic solution on the ocular surface of symptomatic contact lens wearers. Can J Ophthalmol 2005;40: 45-50.
33. Aakre BM, Ystenaes AE, Doughty MJ, Austrheim O, Westerfjell B, Lie MT. A 6-month follow-up of successful refits from daily disposable soft contact lenses to continuous wear of high-Dk siliconehydrogel lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2004;24:130-41.
34. Cheung SW, Cho P, Chan B, Choy C, Ng V. A comparative study of biweekly disposable contact lenses: silicone hydrogel versus hydrogel. Clin Exp Optom 2007;90:124-31.
35. Lim MJ, Hurst RK, Konynenbelt BJ, Ubels JL. Cytotoxicity testing of multipurpose contact lens solutions using monolayer and stratified cultures of human corneal epithelial cells. Eye Contact Lens 2009;35: 287-96.
36. Powell CH, Lally JM, Hoong LD, Huth SW. Lipophilic versus hydrodynamic modes of uptake and release by contact lenses of active entities used in multipurpose solutions. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2010;33:9-18.
37. Rosenthal RA, Dassanayake NL, Schlitzer RL, Schlech BA, Meadows DL, Stone RP. Biocide uptake in contact lenses and loss of fungicidal activity during storage of contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2006;32: 262-6.