Bottom-up driven involuntary attention modulates auditory signal in noise processing

BMC Neuroscience

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Lagemann, Lothar ^a   Okamoto, Hidehiko ^a,b   Teismann, Henning ^a   Pantev, Christo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SOUND; ATTENTION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NOISE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650610858     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-11-156     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bregman AS. Auditory scene analysis: the perceptual organization of sound 1990, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
2. Thompson RF, Spencer WA. Habituation: a model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. Psychological Review 1966, 73(1):16-43. 10.1037/h0022681, 5324565.
3. Ulanovsky N, Las L, Farkas D, Nelken I. Multiple time scales of adaptation in auditory cortex neurons. J Neurosci 2004, 24(46):10440-10453. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1905-04.2004, 15548659.
4. Fairhall AL, Lewen GD, Bialek W, de Ruyter van Steveninck RR. Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code. Nature 2001, 412(6849):787. 10.1038/35090500, 11518957.
5. Dean I, Robinson BL, Harper NS, McAlpine D. Rapid Neural Adaptation to Sound Level Statistics. J Neurosci 2008, 28(25):6430-6438. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0470-08.2008, 18562614.
6. Pantev C, Okamoto H, Ross B, Stoll W, Ciurlia-Guy E, Kakigi R, Kubo T. Lateral inhibition and habituation of the human auditory cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 19(8):2337-2344. 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03296.x, 15090060.
7. Butler RA. Effect of changes in stimulus frequency and intensity on habituation of the human vertex potential. J Acoust Soc Am 1968, 44(4):945-950. 10.1121/1.1911233, 5683660.
8. Ritter W, Vaughan HG, Costa LD. Orienting and habituation to auditory stimuli: a study of short term changes in average evoked responses. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1968, 25(6):550-556. 10.1016/0013-4694(68)90234-4, 4178749.
9. Budd TW, Barry RJ, Gordon E, Rennie C, Michie PT. Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: habituation vs. refractoriness. Int J Psychophysiol 1998, 31(1):51-68. 10.1016/S0167-8760(98)00040-3, 9934621.
10. Rosburg T. Effects of tone repetition on auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields. Clinical neurophysiology 2004, 115(4):898-905. 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.11.011, 15003771.
11. Näätänen R, Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987, 24(4):375-425.
12. Ulanovsky N, Las L, Nelken I. Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons. Nature neuroscience 2003, 6(4):391-398. 10.1038/nn1032, 12652303.
13. Okamoto H, Stracke H, Zwitserlood P, Roberts LE, Pantev C. Frequency-specific modulation of population-level frequency tuning in human auditory cortex. BMC Neuroscience 2009, 10(1):1. 10.1186/1471-2202-10-1, 2637881, 19126204.
14. Okamoto H, Stracke H, Lagemann L, Pantev C. Bottom-up driven involuntary auditory evoked field change: constant sound sequencing amplifies but does not sharpen neural activity. J Neurophysiol 2010, 103(1):244-249. 10.1152/jn.00530.2009, 19889852.
15. Engelien A, Schulz M, Ross B, Arolt V, Pantev C. A combined functional in vivo measure for primary and secondary auditory cortices. Hear Res 2000, 148(1-2):153-160. 10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00148-9, 10978832.
16. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9(1):97-113. 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4, 5146491.
17. Tesche CD, Uusitalo MA, Ilmoniemi RJ, Huotilainen M, Kajola M, Salonen O. Signal-space projections of MEG data characterize both distributed and well-localized neuronal sources. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995, 95(3):189-200. 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00064-6, 7555909.
18. Picton TW, John MS, Dimitrijevic A, Purcell D. Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol 2003, 42(4):177-219. 10.3109/14992020309101316, 12790346.
19. Hari R, Mäkelä JP. Modification of neuromagnetic responses of the human auditory cortex by masking sounds. Exp Brain Res 1988, 71(1):87-92. 10.1007/BF00247524, 3416961.
20. Hübner R, Hafter ER. Cuing mechanisms in auditory signal detection. Perception & psychophysics 1995, 57(2):197-202.
21. Hafter ER, Schlauch RS, Tang J. Attending to auditory filters that were not stimulated directly. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1993, 94(2 Pt 1):743-747. 10.1121/1.408203, 8370880.