Bottom-up driven involuntary auditory evoked field change: Constant sound sequencing amplifies but does not sharpen neural activity

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 244-249

  Okamoto, Hidehiko ^a   Stracke, Henning ^a   Lagemann, Lothar ^a   Pantev, Christo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NERVE FIBER; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; NERVE CELL STIMULATION; NERVE CONDUCTION; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND DETECTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NOISE; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 74049137134     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00530.2009     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alain C. Breaking the wave: effects of attention and learning on concurrent sound perception. Hear Res 229: 225-236, 2007.
2. Alain C, Arnott SR. Selectively attending to auditory objects. Front Biosci 5: D202-D212, 2000.
3. Alain C, Bernstein LJ. From sounds to meaning: the role of attention during auditory scene analysis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 16: 485-489, 2008.
4. Belin P, Zilbovicius M, Crozier S, Thivard L, Fontaine A. Lateralization of speech and auditory temporal processing. J Cogn Neurosci 10: 536-540, 1998.
5. Bidet-Caulet A, Fischer C, Besle J, Aguera PE, Giard MH, Bertrand O. Effects of selective attention on the electrophysiological representation of concurrent sounds in the human auditory cortex. J Neurosci 27: 9252-9261, 2007.
6. Bregman AS. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.
7. Brosch M, Schreiner CE. Time course of forward masking tuning curves in cat primary auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 77: 923-943, 1997.
8. Butler RA. Effect of changes in stimulus frequency and intensity on habituation of the human vertex potential. J Acoust Soc Am 44: 945-950, 1968.
9. Eggermont JJ, Ponton CW. The neurophysiology of auditory perception: from single units to evoked potentials. Audiol Neurootol 7: 71-99, 2002.
10. Garrido MI, Kilner JM, Stephan KE, Friston KJ. The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms. Clin Neurophysiol 120: 453-463, 2009.
11. Higley MJ, Contreras D. Balanced excitation and inhibition determine spike timing during frequency adaptation. J Neurosci 26: 448-457, 2006.
12. Jääskeläinen IP, Ahveninen J, Bonmassar G, Dale AM, Ilmoniemi RJ, Levänen S, Lin FH, May P, Melcher J, Stufflebeam S, Tiitinen H, Belliveau JW. Human posterior auditory cortex gates novel sounds to consciousness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 6809-6814, 2004.
13. Jamison HL, Watkins KE, Bishop DV, Matthews PM. Hemispheric specialization for processing auditory nonspeech stimuli. Cereb Cortex 16: 1266-1275, 2006.
14. Kanno A, Nakasato N, Fujita S, Seki K, Kawamura T, Ohtomo S, Fujiwara S, Yoshimoto T. Right hemispheric dominance in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 47: 129-132, 1996.
15. Micheyl C, Carlyon RP, Gutschalk A, Melcher JR, Oxenham AJ, Rauschecker JP, Tian B, Courtenay Wilson E. The role of auditory cortex in the formation of auditory streams. Hear Res 229: 116-131, 2007.
16. Näätänen R, Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24: 375-425, 1987.
17. Näätänen R, Winkler I. The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol Bull 125: 826-859, 1999.
18. Nager W, Teder-Salejarvi W, Kunze S, Munte T. Preattentive evaluation of multiple perceptual streams in human audition. Neuroreport 14: 871-874, 2003.
19. Okamoto H, Kakigi R, Gunji A, Kubo T, Pantev C. The dependence of the auditory evoked N1m decrement on the bandwidth of preceding notch-filtered noise. Eur J Neurosci 21: 1957-1961, 2005.
20. Okamoto H, Kakigi R, Gunji A, Pantev C. Asymmetric lateral inhibitory neural activity in the auditory system: a magnetoencephalographic study (Abstract). BMC Neurosci 8: 33, 2007a.
21. Okamoto H, Ross B, Kakigi R, Kubo T, Pantev C. N1m recovery from decline after exposure to noise with strong spectral contrasts. Hear Res 196: 77-86, 2004.
22. Okamoto H, Stracke H, Draganova R, Pantev C. Hemispheric asymmetry of auditory evoked fields elicited by spectral versus temporal stimulus change. Cereb Cortex 19: 2290-2297, 2009a.
23. Okamoto H, Stracke H, Ross B, Kakigi R, Pantev C. Left hemispheric dominance during auditory processing in noisy environment (Abstract). BMC Biol 5: 52, 2007b.
24. Okamoto H, Stracke H, Wolters CH, Schmael F, Pantev C. Attention improves population-level frequency tuning in human auditory cortex. J Neurosci 27: 10383-10390, 2007c.
25. Okamoto H, Stracke H, Zwitserlood P, Roberts LE, Pantev C. Frequency-specific modulation of population-level frequency tuning in human auditory cortex (Abstract). BMC Neurosci 10: 1, 2009b.
26. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97-113, 1971.
27. Pantev C, Bertrand O, Eulitz C, Verkindt C, Hampson S, Schuierer G, Elbert T. Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 94: 26-40, 1995.
28. Pantev C, Okamoto H, Ross B, Stoll W, Ciurlia-Guy E, Kakigi R, Kubo T. Lateral inhibition and habituation of the human auditory cortex. Eur J Neurosci 19: 2337-2344, 2004.
29. Pascual-Marqui RD. Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 24, Suppl. D: 5-12, 2002.
30. Pascual-Marqui RD, Esslen M, Kochi K, Lehmann D. Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 24, Suppl. C: 91-95, 2002.
31. Perez-Gonzalez D, Malmierca MS, Covey E. Novelty detector neurons in the mammalian auditory midbrain. Eur J Neurosci 22: 2879-2885, 2005.
32. Picton TW, Alain C, Otten L, Ritter W, Achim A. Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river. Audiol Neurootol 5: 111-139, 2000.
33. Poeppel D. The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as "asymmetric sampling in time." Speech Commun 41: 245-255, 2003.
34. Roberts TPL, Ferrari P, Stufflebeam SM, Poeppel D. Latency of the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components: stimulus dependence and insights toward perception. J Clin Neurophysiol 17: 114-129, 2000.
35. Sams M, Salmelin R. Evidence of sharp frequency tuning in the human auditory cortex. Hear Res 75: 67-74, 1994.
36. Snyder JS, Alain C. Toward a neurophysiological theory of auditory stream segregation. Psychol Bull 133: 780-799, 2007.
37. Sörös P, Teismann IK, Manemann E, Lütkenhöner B. Auditory temporal processing in healthy aging: a magnetoencephalographic study (Abstract). BMC Neurosci 10: 34, 2009.
38. Stracke H, Okamoto H, Pantev C. Interhemispheric support during demanding auditory signal-in-noise processing. Cereb Cortex 19: 1440-1447, 2009.
39. Sussman E, Horvath J, Winkler I, Orr M. The role of attention in the formation of auditory streams. Percept Psychophys 69: 136-152, 2007.
40. Sutter ML, Loftus WC. Excitatory and inhibitory intensity tuning in auditory cortex: evidence for multiple inhibitory mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 90: 2629-2647, 2003.
41. Sutter ML, Schreiner CE, McLean M, O'Connor KN, Loftus WC. Organization of inhibitory frequency receptive fields in cat primary auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 82: 2358-2371, 1999.
42. Tesche CD, Uusitalo MA, Ilmoniemi RJ, Huotilainen M, Kajola M, Salonen O. Signal-space projections of MEG data characterize both distributed and well-localized neuronal sources. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 95: 189-200, 1995.
43. Ulanovsky N, Las L, Farkas D, Nelken I. Multiple time scales of adaptation in auditory cortex neurons. J Neurosci 24: 10440-10453, 2004.
44. Ulanovsky N, Las L, Nelken I. Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons. Nat Neurosci 6: 391-398, 2003.
45. von Békésy G. Sensory Inhibition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1967.
46. Wehr M, Zador AM. Balanced inhibition underlies tuning and sharpens spike timing in auditory cortex. Nature 426: 442-446, 2003.
47. Wu GK, Arbuckle R, Liu BH, Tao HW, Zhang LI. Lateral sharpening of cortical frequency tuning by approximately balanced inhibition. Neuron 58: 132-143, 2008.
48. Zatorre RJ, Belin P. Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex 11: 946-953, 2001.
49. Zwicker E, Fastl H. Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models. New York: Springer, 1999.