Exploring differences in smokers' perceptions of the effectiveness of cessation media messages

Tobacco Control

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 26-33

  Davis, Kevin C ^a   Nonnemaker, James M ^a   Farrelly, Matthew C ^a   Niederdeppe, Jeff ^b  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERTIZING; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MASS MEDIUM; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; AGED; ATTENTION; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; MASS MEDIA; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEW YORK; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650598286     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tc.2009.035568     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Hopkins DP, Briss PA, Ricard CJ, et al. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Am J Prev Med 2001;20(Suppl 2):16-66.
2. National Cancer Institute. The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use. NCI Tobacco Control Monograph 19. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, 2008.
3. Rhodes N, Roskos-Ewoldsen D, Eno CA, et al. The content of cigarette counter-advertising: are perceived functions of smoking addressed? J Health Commun 2009;14:658-73.
4. Wakefield M, Flay B, Nichter M, et al. Effects of anti-smoking advertising on youth smoking: a review. J Health Commun 2003;8:229-47.
5. Biener L, Siegel M. Tobacco marketing and adolescent smoking: more support for a causal inference. Am J Public Health 2000;90:407-11.
6. Durkin S, Biener L, Wakefield M. Effects of different types of antismoking ads on reducing disparities in smoking cessation among socioeconomic subgroups. Am J Public Health 2009;99:2217-23.
7. Biener L, McCallum-Keeler G, Nyman AL. Adults' response to Massachusetts anti-tobacco television advertisements: impact of viewer and advertisement characteristics. Tob Control 2000;9:401-7.
8. Durkin S, Wakefield M. Comparative responses to radio and television anti-smoking advertisements to encourage smoking cessation. Health Promot Int 2010;25:5-13.
9. Niederdeppe J, Davis KC, Farrelly MC, et al. Stylistic features, need for sensation, and confirmed recall of national smoking prevention advertisements. J Commun 2007;57:272-92.
10. Terry-McElrath Y, Wakefield M, Ruel E, et al. The effect of antismoking advertisement executional characteristics on youth comprehension, appraisal, recall, and engagement. J Health Commun 2005;10:127-43.
11. Biener L, Ji M, Gilpin EA, et al. The impact of emotional tone, message, and broadcast parameters in youth anti-smoking advertisements. J Health Commun 2004;9:259-74.
12. Morgan SE, Palmgreen P, Stephenson MT, et al. Associations between message features and subjective evaluations of the sensation value of antidrug public service announcements. J Commun 2003;53:512-26.
13. Donohew L, Lorch EP, Palmgreen P. Applications of a theoretic model of information exposure to health interventions. Hum Commun Res 1998;24:454-68.
14. Toll BA, O'Malley SS, Katulak NA, et al. Comparing gain- and loss-framed messages for smoking cessation with sustained-relapse Bupropion: a randomized controlled trial. Psychol Addict Behav 2007;21:534-44.
15. Steward WT, Schneider TR, Pizarro J, et al. Need for cognition moderates responses to framed smoking-cessation messages. J Appl Soc Psychol 2003;33:2439-64.
16. Schneider TR, Salovey P, Pallonen U, et al. Visual and auditory message framing effects on tobacco smoking. J Appl Soc Psychol 2001;31:667-82.
17. Lang A. The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. J Commun 2000;50:46-70.
18. Lang A, Zhou S, Schwartz N, et al. The effects of edits on arousal, attention, and memory for television messages: when an edit is an edit can an edit be too much? J Broadcast Electron Media 2000;44:94-109.
19. Niederdeppe J. Syntactic indeterminacy, message sensation value-enhancing features, and message processing in the context of tobacco countermarketing advertisements. Commun Monogr 2005;72:324-44.
20. O'Keefe DJ. Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Commun Theory 2003;13:251-74.
21. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. New York: Academic Press, 1986.
22. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. Involvement and persuasion: tradition versus integration. Psychol Bull 1990;107:367-74.
23. Dillard JP, Shen L, Vail RG. Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 consistent answers. Hum Commun Res 2007;33:467-88.
24. Dillard JP, Weber KM, Vail RG. The relationship between the perceived and actual effectiveness of persuasive messages: a meta-analysis with implications for formative campaign research. J Commun 2007;57:613-31.
25. Southwell B, Barmada C, Hornik R, et al. Can we measure encoded exposure? Validation evidence from a national campaign. J Health Commun 2002;7:445-53.
26. Bruner GC. Standardization and justification: do Aad scales measure up? J Curr Iss Res Advert 1998;20:1-18.
27. Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1979.
28. Cohen J. Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.
29. Snyder LB, Hamilton MA, Mitchell EW, et al. A meta-analysis of the effect of mediated health communication campaigns on behavior change in the United States. J Health Commun 2004;9(Suppl 1):71-96.
30. Dillard JP, Peck E. Affect and persuasion: emotional responses to public service announcements. Communic Res 2000;27:461-95.
31. Wong N, Ho A, Capella J, et al. Improving antismoking message effectiveness: death appeals, argument strength, and message sensation value. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association. Montreal, Quebec, Canada, May 21, 2008.
32. Batra R, Ray ML. Affective responses mediating acceptance of advertising. J Consum Res 1986;13:234-49.