Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology

ASSETS'10 - Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 3-10

  Mankoff, Jennifer ^a   Hayes, Gillian R ^b   Kasnitz, Devva ^c  

^a Carnegie Mellon University ^*  (United States)

^b 5226 Donald Bren Hall   (United States)

^c Devvaco Consulting and Society for Disability Studies   (United States)

Author keywords

Assistive technology; Disability studies

Indexed keywords

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; DISABILITY STUDIES; RESEARCH PROCESS;

RESEARCH; TECHNOLOGY;

TEACHING;

EID: 78650594855     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1878803.1878807     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (74)

1. Adam, P. (n.d.). Small Talk. Wellsphere. http://www.wellsphere.com/ autism-autism-spectrum-article/small-tal/590422. Retrieved April 23, 2010.
2. Albrecht, G. (Ed.). (2006). Encyclopedia of Disability. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
3. Aronson, J. (2000). Sound and Fury.
4. Balcazar, F. E., Keys, c. B., Kaplan, D. L., & Suarez-Balcazar, Y. (1998). Participatory action research and people with disabilities: Principles and challenges. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 12 (2), 105-112.
5. Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. Disability (key concepts). Cambridge: Polity.
6. Bedrosian, J. L. (1995). Limitations in the use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 6-10.
7. Buckley, M., Nordlinger, J., & Subramanian, D. (2008). Socially relevant computing. SIGCSE'08, (pp. 347-351).
8. Clark, N. M. (2003). Management of chronic disease by patients. Annual Review of Public Health, 24, 289-313.
9. Cohen, M. J., & Sloan, D. L. (2007). Visual Supports for People with Autism: A Guide for Parents and Professionals. U.S.A.: Woodbine House.
10. Coyne, K. P., & Nielsen, J. (2001 October). How to conduct usability evaluations for accessibility: Methodology guidelines for testing websites and intranets with users who use assistive technology. Nielsen Norman Group.
11. Dawe, M. (2006). Desperately seeking simplicity: how young adults with cognitive disabilities and their families adopt assistive technologies. CHI'06, (pp. 1143-1152).
12. DeJong, G. (1979). Independent living: From social movement to analytic paradigm. Archives of Physical Med. Rehab., 60, 435-446.
13. Dimitriadis, G., & Carlson, D. (2006). Promises to Keep: Cultural Studies, Democratic Education, and Public LIfe. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
14. Foucault, M. (1979). On Governmentality. Ideology and Consciousness, 6, 5-22.
15. French, S. (1994). Researching disability. In S. French (Ed.), On Equal Terms: Working with Disabled People (pp. 136-147). Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann.
16. Gallagher, J. J. (1976). The sacred and profane uses of labeling. Mental Retardation, 14 (6), 3-7.
17. Glatthorn, A. A. (1993). Outcome Based Education: Reform and the Curriculum Process. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 8 (4), 354-63.
18. Groce, N. E. (1985). Everyone Here Spoke Sign Language: Hereditory Deafness on Martha's Vineyard. Harvard University Press.
19. Guo, B. (2005). Building Social Capital: A Study of the Online Disability Community. Disability Studies Quarterly, 25 (2).
20. Hargreaves, A., & Moore, S. (2000). Educational Outcomes, Modern and Postmodern Interpretations: response to Smyth and Dow. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21 (1), 27-42.
21. Hayes, G. R., & Abowd, G. D. (2006). Tensions in designing capture technologies for an evidence-based care community. Proc. CHI'06, (pp. 937-946).
22. Hayes, G. R., Cheng, K., Hirano, S., Park, S., Gravem, D., Rich, J., Cooper, D. (2010). FitBaby: Using observations of daily living to improve the health of preterm infants and their caregivers. Proc. WISH'10.
23. Hayes, G. R., Gardere, L., Abowd, G. D., & Truong, K. N. (2008). CareLog: A selective archiving tool for behavior management in schools. Proc. CHI'08, (pp. 685-694).
24. Hayes, G. R., Hirano, S. H., Marcu, G., Monibi, M., Nguyen, D. H., & Yeganyan, M. T. (2010). Interactive visual supports for Children with autism. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, To Appear.
25. Hayes, G. R., Kientz, G. A., Truong, K. N., White, D. R., Abowd, G. D., & Pering, T. (2004). Designing capture applications to support the education of children with Autism. Proc. Ubicomp'04, (pp. 161-178).
26. Higginbotham, D. J. (1995). The use of non-disabled sub jects in AAC research: Confessions of a research infidel. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 2-5.
27. Hirano, S., Yeganyan, M., Marcu, G., Nguyen, D., Boyd, L.A., Hayes, G.R. vSked: Evaluation of a System to Support Classroom Activities for Children with Autism. Proc CHI 2010. April 12-15, 2010. Atlanta GA USA, 1633-1642.
28. Hochheiser, H., & Lazar, J. (2007). HCI and social issues: A framework for engagement. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 23 (3), 339-374.
29. Hurst, A., Mankoff, J., & Hudson, S. E. (2008). Understanding pointing problems in real world computing environments. Proc. ASSETS'08, (pp. 43-50).
30. Kang, J.-G. (2009). A Teacher's Deconstruction of Disability: A Discourse Analysis. Disability Studies Quarterly, 29 (1).
31. Kasnitz, D. (2001). Life event histories of independent living. In M. Priestly (Ed.), Disability and the Life Course (pp. 67-79). Cambridge: Cambirdge University Press.
32. Kasnitz, D. & Shuttleworth, R.P. (2001). Anthropology and Disability Studies. In Rogers, L.J. & Swadener, B.B. (Eds.), Semiotics and dis/ability: interrogating categories of difference. New York: State University of New York Press.
33. Kemp, E. (1981). Aiding the disabled: No pity, please. New York Times.
34. Kientz, J. A., & Abowd, G. D. (2009). KidCam: Toward an Effective Technology for the Capture of Children's Moments of Interest. Pervasive '09, (pp. 115-132).
35. Kientz, J. A., Arriaga, R. I., & Abowd, G. D. (2009). Baby steps: evaluation of a system to support record-keeping for parents of young children. Proc. CHI'09, (pp. 1713-1722).
36. Kiger, G. (1992). Disability simulations: Logical, methodological and ethical issues. Disability & Society, 7 (1), 71-78.
37. Klotz, J. (2003). The culture concept: anthropology, disability studies and intellectual disability. In Disability Studies and Research Institute (DSaRI) Symposium. Sydney, Australia.
38. Kras, J. F. (2010). The 'Ransom Notes' Affair: When the Neurodiversity Movement Came of Age. Disability Studies Quarterly, 30 (1).
39. LinguaLinks Library, Version 4.0. (1999). SIL International.
40. Linton, S. (1998). Claiming Disability: Knowledge and Identity. New York: NYU Press.
41. Litvak, S., & Enders, A. (2001). The interface between individuals and environments. In G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of Disability Studies (pp. 711-733). Sage.
42. Lloyd, M., Preston-Shoot, M., Temple, B., & with Wuu, R. (1996). Whose project is it anyway? Sharing and sahping the research and development agenda. Disability and society, 11 (3), 301-315.
43. Mactavish, J., Mahon, M., & Lutfiyya, Z. (2000). I can speak for myself: Involving individuals with intellectual disabilities as research participants. Mental Retardation, 38, 216-227.
44. Magasi, S. (2008). Disability studies in practice: A work in progress. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 15 (6), 611-17.
45. Mankoff, J. C., Fait, H., & Juang, R. (2005). Evaluating accessibility through simulating the experiences of users with vision or motor impairments. IBM Systems Journal, 44 (3), 505-518.
46. Mankoff, J. (2006). Case study of Service-Learning for HCI: Practical guidelines for successful integration. CHI'06 Extended Abstracts, Experience Report, (pp. 201-206).
47. Mankoff, J., Dey, A. K., Batra, U., & Moore, M. (2002). Web Accessibility for Low Bandwidth Input. ASSETS'02, (pp. 17-24).
48. Mankoff, J., Fait, H., & Tran, T. (2005). Is your web page accessible?: a comparative study of methods for assessing web page accessibility for the blind. CHI'05, (pp. 41-50).
49. Meekosha, H., & Shuttleworth, R. (n.d.). What's so 'critical' about critical disability studies? Australian Journal of Human Rights, In Press.
50. Moffatt, K., McGrenere, J., Purves, B., & Klawe, M. (2004). The participatory design of a sound and image enhanced daily planner for people with aphasia. Proc. CHI'04, (pp. 407-414).
51. Muller, M. J., & Kuhn, S. (1993). Participatory design. Communications of the ACM, 36 (6), pp. 24-28.
52. muskie. (n.d.). Institute for the Study of the Neurologically Typical. http://isnt.autistics.org. Retrieved April 23, 2010.
53. Newell, A. F., & Gregor, P. (2000). "User Sensitive Inclusive Design" - in search of a new paradigm. Proc. CUU'00, (pp. 39-44).
54. Oliver, M. (1996). Chapter 3: Defining Impairment and Disability: Issues at Stake. In C. Barnes, & G. Mercer (Eds.), Exploring the Divide (pp. 29-54). Leeds: The Disability Press.
55. Oliver, M. (1994). Politics and language: Understanding the disability discourse. Unit in Disability Studies Programme. Dept. of Psychotherapy, University of Sheffield.
56. Paterson, K., & Hughes, B. (1999). Disability studies and phenomenology: The carnal politics of everyday life. Disability & Society, 14 (5), 597-610.
57. Pedlow, R., Kasnitz, D., & Shuttleworth, R. (n.d.). Barriers to the adoption of cell phones for older people with impairments in the USA: Results from an expert review and field study. Journal of Technology and Disability, To Appear.
58. Pinder, R. (1996). Sick-but-fit or Fit-but-sick? Ambiguity and Identity in the Workplace. In C. Barnes, & G. Mercer (Eds.), Exploring the Divide (pp. 135-156). Leeds: The Disability Press.
59. Sacks, O. (1995). An anthropologist on Mars. In An anthropologist on Mars: Seven paradoxical tales (pp. 233-282). London: Picador.
60. Scherer, M. J. (2000). Living in the State of Stuck: How Assistive Technology Impacts the Lives of People with Disabilities. Brookline Books.
61. Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability Rights and Wrongs. Abingdon: Routledge.
62. Shneiderman, B. (2000). Universal usability. Communications of the ACM, 43 (5), pp. 84-91.
63. Sinclair, J. (2010). Cultural Commentary: Being Autistic Together. Disability Studies Quarterly, 30 (1).
64. Sinclair, J. (1993). Don't Mourn For Us. Our Voice, 1 (3).
65. Smyth, J., & Dow, A. (1998). What's Wrong with Outcomes? Spotter planes, action plans and steerage of the educational workplace. British J. of Sociology of Education, 19 (3), 291-303.
66. Spindler, G., & Spindler, L. (2000). Fifty Years of Anthropology and Education: 1950-2000. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
67. Takagi, H., Asakawa, C., Fukuda, K., & Maeda, J. (2004). Accessibility Designer: Visualizing Usability for the Blind. Proc. ASSETS'04, (pp. 177-184).
68. Thomas, C. (2007). Sociologies of Disability and Illness: Contested Ideas in Disability Studies and Medical Sociology. Palgrave McMilian.
69. Titchkosky, T. (2005). Clenched Subjectivity: Disability, Women, and Medical Discourse. Disability Studies Quarterly, 25 (3).
70. Tusler, A. (2005). How to Make Technology Work: A Study of Best Practices in United States Electronic and Information Technology Companies. Disability Studies Quarterly, 25 (2).
71. Walmsley, J. (1997). Including People with Learning Difficulties: Theory and Practice. In L. B. Oliver (Ed.), Disability Studies: Past Present and Future (pp. 62-77). Leeds: The Disability Press.
72. Winter, J. A. (2003). The Development of the Disability Rights Movement as a Social Problem Solver. Disability Studies Quarterly, 23 (1), 33-61.
73. Wu, M., Richards, B., & Baecker, R. (2004). Participatory design with Individuals who have Amnesia. Proc. Participatory Design Conference 2004, (pp. 214-223).
74. Zola, K. I. (1983). Developing New Self-Images and Interdependence. In N. Crewe, I. K. Zola, & &. Associates (Eds.), Independent Living for Physically Disabled People (pp. 49-59). San Francisco, Washington, London: Jossey-Bass.