Potential of superelastic Cu-Al-Mn alloy bars for seismic applications

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 107-115

  Araki, Y ^a   Endo, T ^a   Omori, T ^b   Sutou, Y ^b   Koetaka, Y ^c   Kainuma, R ^b   Ishida, K ^b  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c OSAKA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cu Al Be; Cu Al Mn; Ni Ti; Shape memory alloy (SMA); Superelasticity

Indexed keywords

ALLOYS; ELASTICITY; MANGANESE; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; SEISMOLOGY; SHAPE MEMORY EFFECT; TENSILE TESTING; TITANIUM ALLOYS;

CU-AL-BE; CU-AL-MN; NI-TI; SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY; SUPERELASTICITY;

ALUMINUM;

ALLOY; CYCLIC LOADING; ELASTICITY; FRACTURE; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRAIN; TESTING METHOD;

EID: 78650525131     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.1029     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Graesser EJ, Cozzarelli FA. Shape memory alloys as new material for aseismic isolation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1991; 117:2590-2608.
2. Dolce M, Cardone D, Marnetto R. Implementation and testing of passive control devices on shape memory alloys. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 29:945-968.
3. Bruno S, Valent C. Comparative response analysis of conventional and innovative seismic strategies. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:1067-1092.
4. Han YL, Li QS, Li AQ, Leung AYT, Lin PH. Structural vibration control by shape memory alloy damper. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32:483-494.
5. DesRoches R, Smith B. Shape memory alloys in seismic resistant design and retrofit: a critical review of their potential and limitations. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2003; 7:1-15.
6. Dolce M, Cardone D, Ponzo FC, Valente C. Shaking table tests on reinforced concrete frames without and with passive control systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34:1687-1717.
7. Wilson JC, Wesolowsky MJ. Shape memory alloys for seismic response modification: a state-of-the-art review. Earthquake Spectra 2005; 21:569-601.
8. Song G, Ma N, Li HN. Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures. Engineering Structures 2006; 28:1266-1274.
9. Dolce M, Cardone D, Ponzo FC. Shaking-table tests on reinforced concrete frames with different isolation systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 36:573-596.
10. McCormick JP, Tyber J, DesRoches R, Gall K, Maier HJ. Structural engineering with NiTi. Part II: mechanical behavior and scaling. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2007; 133:1019-1029.
11. Li H, Mao CX, Ou JP. Experimental sand theoretical study on two types of shape memory alloy devices. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 37:407-426.
12. Zhu S, Zhang Y. Seismic behavior of self-centering braced frame buildings with reusable hysteretic damping brace. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36:1329-1346.
13. Torra T, Isalgue A, Lovey FC, Martorell F, Molina FJ, Sade M, Tachoire H. Shape memory alloys: from the physical properties of metastable phase transitions to dampers for civil engineering applications. Journal de Physique IV 2004; 113:85-90.
14. Casciati F, Faravelli L. Experimental characterization of a Cu-based shape memory alloy toward its exploitation in passive control devices. Journal de Physique IV 2004; 115:299-306.
15. Casciati F, Faravelli L. Structural components in shape memory alloy for localized energy dissipation. Computers and Structures 2007; 86:309-330.
16. Sepulveda A, Boroschek R, Herrera R, Moroni O, Sarrazin M. Steel beam-column connection using copper-based shape memory alloy dampers. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2008; 64:429-435.
17. Araya R, Marivil M, Mir C, Moroni O, Sepulveda A. Temperature and grain size effects on the behavior of CuAlBe SMA wires under cyclic loading. Materials Science and Engineering A 2008; 496:209-213.
18. Zhang Y, Hu X, Zhu S. Seismic performance of benchmark base-isolated bridges with superelastic Cu-Al-Be restraining damping device. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2009; 16:668-685.
19. IARC. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Beryllium, Cadmium, Mercury and Exposures in Glass Manufacturing Industry, vol. 58. IARC, Lyon, 1994.
20. Sutou Y, Omori T, Kainuma R, Ishida K. Effect of grain size and texture on superelasticity of Cu-Al-Mn-based shape memory alloys. Journal de Physique IV 2003; 112:511-514.
21. Sutou Y, Omori T, Yamauchi K, Ono N, Kainuma R, Ishida K. Effect of grain size and texture on pseudoelasticity in Cu-Al-Mn-based shape memory wire. Acta Materia 2005; 53:4121-4133.
22. Ishibashi M, Tabata N, Suetake T, Omori T, Sutou Y, Kainuma R, Yamauchi K, Ishida K. A simple method to treat ingrowing toenail with a shape-memory alloy device. Journal of Dermatological Treatment 2008; 19:291-292.
23. Otsuka K, Wayman CM, Nakai K, Sakamoto H, Shimizu K. Superelasticity effects and stress-induced martensitic transformations in Cu-Al-Ni alloys. Acta Metallurgica 1976; 24:207-226.