A novel profile based model for virtual representation of quasi-symmetric plant organs

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 113-124

  Mebatsion, H K ^a   Boudon, F ^c   Godin, C ^c   Pradal, C ^c   Genard M ^b   Goz Bac, C ^d   Bertin, N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b Domaine Saint Paul   (France)

^c CIRAD   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ MONTPELLIER 2   (France)

Author keywords

Fourier descriptors; Multiscale modeling; Organ modeling; Virtual fruits

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES; BOUNDARY POINTS; BOUNDARY SHAPES; CROSS SECTION; CURVED SHAPES; DIGITIZED IMAGES; ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL; FOURIER; FOURIER DESCRIPTORS; FRUIT SHAPE; GEOMETRIC MODELS; IMAGE BOUNDARIES; JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE; LONGITUDINAL AXIS; MATHWORKS; MODELING APPROACH; MODELING PROCEDURE; MULTI-SCALE MODELING; ORGAN MODELING; PLANT ORGANS; SERIES APPROXIMATIONS; SUM-OF-SINES; SURFACE CONSTRUCTION; SURFACE PERTURBATIONS; TOMATO FRUITS; VIRTUAL FRUITS; VIRTUAL REPRESENTATIONS;

FOURIER ANALYSIS; FOURIER SERIES; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; HARMONIC ANALYSIS;

FRUITS;

ALGORITHM; BIOCHEMISTRY; CASSAVA; DIGITAL IMAGE; FRUIT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; SYMMETRY;

CUCUMIS SATIVUS; HELIANTHUS TUBEROSUS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MANIHOT ESCULENTA;

EID: 78650517694     PISSN: 01681699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2010.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Barr A.H. Global and local deformation of solid primitives. ACM Comp. Graphics 1984, 18(3):21-34.
2. Barron J.L., Fleet D.J., Beauchemin S.S. Performance of optical flow techniques. Int. J. Comp. Vision 1994, 12(1):43-77.
3. Beyer M., Hahn R., Peschel S., Marz M., Knoche M. Analysing fruit shape in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Sci. Hortic. 2002, 96:139-150.
4. Benko P., Martin R.R., Varady T. Algorithms to reverse engineering boundary representation models. Comp. Aided Design 2001, 33:839-851.
5. Borrel V., Bechmann D. Deformation of N-dimensional objects. Int. J. Comput. Geometry Appl. 1991, 1(4):427-453.
6. Chen H., De Baerdemaeker J. Finite-element-based modal analysis of fruit firmness. Trans. ASAE 1993, 36:1827-1833.
7. Chen H., De Baerdemaeker J., Bellon V. Finite element study of the melon for nondestructive sensing of firmness. Trans. ASAE 1996, 39:1057-1065.
8. Costa C., Manesatti P., Pagila G., Pallottino F., Aguzzi J., Rimatori V., Russo G., Recupero S., Recupero G.R. Quantitative evaluation of Toroco sweet orange fruit shape using optoelectronic elliptic Fourier based analysis. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2009, 54:38-45.
9. Crampton J.s. Elliptic Fourier shape analysis of fossil bivalves: some practical considerations. Lethaia 1995, 28:179-186.
10. Currie A.J., Ganeshanandam S., Noiton D.A., Garrick D., Shelbourne C.J.A., Oraguzie N.N. Quantitative evaluation of apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) fruit shape by principal component analysis of Fourier descriptors. Euphytica 2000, 111:219-227.
11. Da Silva, D., 2008. Caractérisation de la nature multi-échelles de plantes par des outils de géométrie fractal, application à la modélisation de l'interception de la lumière. PhD thesis, Université Montpellier 2.
12. Dimas E., Briassoulis D. 3D geometric modelling based on NURBS: a review. Adv. Eng. Softw. Arch. 1999, 30(9-11):741-751.
13. Ekombo P.L.E., Ennahnahi N., Oumsis M., Meknassi M. Application of affine invariant Fourier descriptor to shape based image retrieval. Int. J. Comp. Sci. Network Security 2009, 9(7):240-247.
14. Furuta N., Ninomiya S., Takahashi N., Ohmori H., Uka Y. Quantitative evaluation of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) leaflet shape by principal component scores based on elliptic Fourier descriptor. Breed. Sci. 1995, 45:315-320.
15. Gain J.E., Dodgson N. Adaptive refinement and decimation under free form deformation. Eurographics UK '99 1999.
16. Génard M., Bertin N., Borel C., Bussières P., Gautier H., Habib H., Léchaudel M., Lecomte A., Lescourret F., Lobit P., Quilot B. Towards a virtual fruit focusing on quality: modeling features and potential uses. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58:917-928.
17. Gopal T.V., Prasad V.K. A novel approach to shape based image retrieval integrating adapted Fourier descriptors and freeman code. Int. J. Comp. Sci. Network Security 2008, 8:293-302.
18. Hsu W.M., Hughes J.F., Kaufman H. Direct manipulation of free form deformations. Comp. Graphics 1992, 26(2):177-184.
19. Iwata H., Niikura S., Matsuura S., Takano Y., Ukai Y. Evaluation of variation of root shape of Japanese radish (Raphanus sativus L.) based on image analysis using elliptic Fourier descriptors. Euphytica 1998, 102:143-149.
20. Jancsók P.T., Clijmans L., Nicolaï B.M., Baerdemaeker J.D. Investigation of the effect of shape on acoustic response of 'Conference' pears by finite element modelling. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2001, 23:1-12.
21. Jensen R.J., Ciofani K.M., Miramontes L.C. Lines, outlines, and landmarks: morphometric analyses of leaves of Acer rubrum, Acer saccharinum (Aceraceae) and their hybrid. Taxon 2002, 51(3):475-492.
22. Kafashan J., Tijskens B., Moshou D., Mouazen, De Baerdemamaeker J., Ramon H. Image processing to create a realistic 3D model of apple based on slices. 2006 ASAE Annual Meeting @2006 2006, Paper number 066003.
23. Kawabata S., Yokoo M., Nii K. Quantitative analysis of corolla shapes and petal contours in single-flower cultivars of lisianthus. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 121:206-212.
24. Khanali M., Ghasemi Varnamkhasti M., Tabatabaeefar A., Mobli H. Mass and volume modelling of tangerine (Citrus reticulate) fruit with some physical attributes. Int. Agrophys. 2007, 21:329-334.
25. Kocjan K. Partial shape matching using convex hull and Fourier descriptors. Ann. UMCS Informatics AI 2005, 3:35-43.
26. Kreyszig E. Advanced Engineering Mathematics 2006, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
27. Langenakens J., Vandewalle X., De Baerdemaeker J. Influence of global shape and internal structure of tomatoes on the resonant frequency. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1997, 66:41-49.
28. Ling L., Hongzhen X., Wenlin S., Gelin L. Research on visualization of fruits based on deformation. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 2007, 50:593-600.
29. Lootens P., Van Waes J., Carlier L. Description of the morphology of roots of Chicorium intybus L. partim by means of image analysis: comparison of elliptic Fourier descriptors and classical parameters. Comp. Electron. Agric. 2007, 58:164-173.
30. Lu G., Sajjanhar A. Region based shape presentation and similarity measure suitable for content based image retrieval. Multimedia Syst. 1999, 7:165-174.
31. Mebatsion H.K., Verboven P., Ho Q.T., Mendoza F., Verlinden B.E., Nguyen T.A., Nicolaï B.M. Modeling fruit microstructure using novel ellipse tessellation algorithm. CMES - Comp. Modell. Eng. Sci. 2006, 14:1-14.
32. Mebatsion H.K., Verboven P., Jancsók P.T., Ho Q.T., Verlinden B., Nicolaï B.M. Modeling 3-D fruit tissue microstructure using a novel ellipsoid tessellation algorithm. CMES - Comp. Modell. Eng. Sci. 2008, 29(3):137-149.
33. Mebatsion H.K., Verboven P., Verlinden B.E., Ho Q.T., Nguyen T.A., Nicolaï B.M. Microscale modelling of fruit tissue using Voronoi tessellations. Comp. Electron. Agric. 2006, 52:36-48.
34. Menesattia P., Costa C., Paglia G., Pallottino F., D'Andrea S., Rimatori V., Aguzzi J. Shape-based methodology for multivariate discrimination among Italian hazelnut cultivars. Biosyst. Eng. 2008, 100:417-424.
35. Moulton J.D., Dendy J.E., Hyman J.M. The black box multigrid numerical homogenization algorithm. J. Comput. Phys. 1998, 141:1-29.
36. Moustakides G., Briassoulis D., Psarakis E., Dimas E. 3D image acquisition and NURBS based geometry modelling of natural objects. Adv. Eng. Software 2000, 31(12):955-969.
37. Neto J.C., Meyer G.E., Jones D., Samal D.A.K. Plant species identification using Elliptic Fourier leaf shape analysis. Comp. Electron. Agric. 2006, 50:121-134.
38. Nguyen T.A., Verboven P., Schenk A., Nicolai{dotless} B.M. Prediction of water loss from pears (Pyrus communis cv. Conference) during controlled atmosphere storage as affected by relative humidity. J. Food Eng. 2007, 83:149-155.
39. Ohsawa R., Tsutsumi T., Uehara H., Namai H., Ninomiya S. Quantitative evaluation of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) kernel shape by elliptic Fourier descriptor. Euphytica 1998, 101(2):175-183.
40. Peigel L., Tiller W. Surface skinning revisited. Visual Comp. 2002, 18:273-283.
41. Pradal C., Boudon F., Nouguier C., Chopard J., Godin C. PlantGL: a python-based geometric library for 3D plant modeling at different scales. Graph. Models 2009, 71:1-21.
42. Saudreau M., Sinoquet H., Santin O., Marquier A., Adam B., Longuenesse J., Guilioni L., Chelle M. A 3D model for simulating the spatial and temporal distribution of temperature within ellipsoidal fruit. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 2007, 147:1-15.
43. Sederberg T.W., Parry S.R. Free-form deformation of solid geometric models. Comp. Graphics 1986, 20:151-159.
44. Tanksley S.D. The genetic, developmental, and molecular bases of fruit size and shape variation in tomato. Plant Cell 2004, 16:S181-S189.
45. Verstreken E., De Baerdemaeker J. Evolution of maturity of peaches: non-destructive firmness measurement from the acoustic impulse response. Int. Agrophysics 1994, 8:469-473.
46. Weber R., Schek H.J., Blott S. A quantitative analysis and performance study for similarity-search methods in high-dimensional spaces. Proceedings of the 24th VLDB Conference 1998, 194-205.
47. Yoshioka Y., Iwata H., Hase N., Matsuura S., Ohsawa R., Ninomiya S. Genetic combining ability of petal shape in garden pansy (Viola × wittrockiana Gams) based on image analysis. Euphytica 2006, 151:311-319.
48. Zhang D., Lu G. A comparative study of Fourier descriptors for shape representation and retrieval. The 5th Asian Conference on Computer Vision 2002.
49. Zhang D., Lu G. Study and evaluation of different Fourier methods for image retrieval. Image Vision Comput. 2005, 23(2005):33-49.