A Multiagent Approach for Collective Decision Making in Knowledge Management

Group Decision and Negotiation

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 19-37

  Brigui Chtioui, Imène ^a   Saad, Inès ^b,c  

^a GRIISG Institut Supérieur de Gestion   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE PICARDIE JULES VERNE   (France)

^c Amiens School of Management   (France)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Conflict resolution; Decision support system; Knowledge Classification; Knowledge management; Multi agent systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650513828     PISSN: 09262644     EISSN: 15729907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-010-9202-x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Amgoud L, Serrurier M (2008) Agents that argue and explain classifications. Auton Agent Multi Agent Syst 16(2): 187-209.
2. Belto V, Pictet J (1997) A framework for group decision using a MCDA model: sharing, aggregation or comparing individual information. Revue Syst Décis 6(3): 283-303.
3. Bichler M (2000) An experimental analysis of multi-attribute auctions. Decis Support Syst 29(3): 249-268.
4. Brigui-Chtioui I, Saad I (2009) A mediating algorithm for multicriteria collaborative knowledge classification. In: Visioning and engineering the knowledge society. A web science perspective, LNCS. Springer, Berlin, pp 147-155.
5. Chesñevar C, Brena A, Aguirre J (2006) Solving power and trust conflicts through argumentation in agent-mediated knowledge distribution. Int J Knowl Based Intell Eng Syst 10(4): 263-276.
6. Dieng R, Corby O, Giboin A, Rybière M (1999). Methods and tools for corporate knowledge management. Technical report, INRIA, ACACIA project.
7. Dung PM (1995) On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif Intell J 77: 321-357.
8. Gomez SA, Chesñevar I. (2004) A hybrid approach to pattern classification using neural networks and defeasible argumentation. 17th international FLAIRS 2004 conference, pp 393-398.
9. Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R (2001) Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res 129(1): 1-47.
10. Grundstein M (2000) From capitalizing on company knowledge to knowledge management. In: Morey D, Maybury M, Thuraisingham B (eds) Knowledge management, classic and contemporary works. MIT, Massachusetts, pp 261-287.
11. Saad I, (2005) Une contribution méthodologique pour l'aide à l'identification et l'évaluation des connaissances nécessitant une opération de capitalisation. Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris-Dauphine.
12. Saad I Grundstein M, Rosenthal-Sabroux C (2008) How to improve collaborative decision making in the context of knowledge management. In: Zaraté P et al. (eds) Collaborative decision making: perspectives and challenges. IOS, pp 493-500.
13. Saad I, Chakhar S (2009) A decision support system for identifying crucial knowledge requiring capitalizing operation. Eur J Oper Res 195(3): 889-904.
14. Saad I, Rosenthal-Sabroux C, Grundstein M (2005) Improving the decision making process in the design project by capitalizing on company's crucial knowledge. Group Decis Negot 14: 131-145.
15. Spanoudakis N, Moraitis P (2007) Argumentation-based agent interaction in an ambient-intelligence context. Intell Syst 22(6): 84-93.
16. Tseng B, Huang C (2005) Capitalizing on knowledge: a novel approach to crucial knowledge determination. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 35: 919-931.