Two new strategies for detecting and understanding QTL × environment interactions

Crop Science

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 96-113

  Gauch Jr , Hugh G ^a   Rodrigues, Paulo C ^b   Munkvold, Jesse D ^c   Heffner, Elliot L ^a   Sorrells, Mark ^a  

^a Cornell Univ ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

^c Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; HORDEUM; HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 78650503682     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2010.04.0206     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anderson, J.A., M.E. Sorrells, and S.D. Tanksley. 1993. RFLP analysis of genomic regions associated with resistance to preharvest sprouting in wheat. Crop Sci. 33:453-459.
2. Annicchiarico, P. 2002. Genotype. environment interactions: Challenges and opportunities for plant breeding and cultivar recommendations. FAO Plant Prod. and Prot. Pap. 174. FAO, Rome.
3. Annicchiarico, P., F. Bellah, and T. Chiari. 2005. Defining subregions and estimating benefits for a specific-adaptation strategy by breeding programs: A case study. Crop Sci. 45:1741-1749.
4. Annicchiarico, P., F. Bellah, and T. Chiari. 2006. Repeatable genotype. location interaction and its exploitation by conventional and GIS-based cultivar recommendation for durum wheat in Algeria. Eur. J. Agron. 24:70-81.
5. Annicchiarico, P., C. Royo, F. Bellah, and M. Moragues. 2009. Relationships among adaptation patterns, morphophysiological traits and molecular markers in durum wheat. Plant Breed. 128:164-171.
6. Boer, M.P., D. Wright, L. Feng, D.W. Podlich, L. Luo, M. Cooper, and F.A. van Eeuwijk. 2007. A mixed-model quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis for multiple-environment trial data using environmental covariables for QTl-by-environment interactions, with an example in maize. Genetics 177:1801-1813.
7. Churchill, G.A., and R.W. Doerge. 1994. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138:963-971.
8. Crossa, J., P.N. Fox, W.H. Pfeiffer, S. Rajaram, and H.G. Gauch. 1991. AMMI adjustment for statistical analysis of an international wheat yield trial. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:27-37.
9. Efron, B., and G. Gong. 1983. A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. Am. Stat. 37:36-48.
10. Finlay, K.W., and G.N. Wilkinson. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14:742-754.
11. Gauch, H.G. 1992. Statistical analysis of regional yield trials: AMMI analysis of factorial designs. Elsevier, Amsterdam. (Chinese ed., China Natl. Rice Res. Inst., Hangzhou, China, 2001.)
12. Gauch, H.G. 2002. Scientific method in practice. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK. (Chinese ed., Tsinghua Univ. Press, Beijing, 2004).
13. Gauch, H.G. 2006. Winning the accuracy game. Am. Sci. 94:133-141.
14. Gauch, H.G. 2007. MATMODEL version 3.0: Open source software for AMMI and related analyses. Available at http://www.css.cornell.edu/staff/gauch (verified 18 Oct. 2010). Crop and Soil Sci., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.
15. Gauch, H.G., and R.W. Zobel. 1997. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci. 37:311-326.
16. Hayes, P.M., F.Q. Chen, A. Kleinhofs, A. Kilian, and D.E. Mather. 1996. Barley genome mapping and its applications. p. 229-249. In P.P. Jauhar (ed.) Method of genome analysis in plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
17. Hayes, P.M., B.H. Liu, S.J. Knapp, F. Chen, B. Jones, T. Blake, J. Frankowiak, D. Rasmusson, M. Sorrells, S.E. Ullrich, D. Wesenberg, and A. Kleinhofs. 1993. Quantitative trait locus effects and environmental interaction in a sample of North American barley germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87:392-401.
18. Heffner, E.L., M.E. Sorrells, and J.-L. Jannink. 2009. Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci. 49:1-12.
19. Hill, M.O., R.G.H. Bunce, and M.W. Shaw. 1975. Indicator species analysis, a divisive polythetic method of classification, and its application to a survey of native pinewoods in Scotland. J. Ecol. 63:597-613.
20. Jiang, C., and Z.-B. Zeng. 1995. Multiple trait analysis of genetic mapping for quantitative trait loci. Genetics 140:1111-1127.
21. Lacaze, X., P.M. Hayes, and A. Korol. 2009. Genetics of phenotypic plasticity: QTL analysis in barley, Hordeum vulgare. Heredity 102:163-173.
22. MacKay, D.J.C. 1992. Bayesian interpolation. Neural Comput. 4:415-447.
23. Malosetti, M., J. Voltas, I. Romagosa, S.E. Ullrich, and F.A. van Eeuwijk. 2004. Mixed models including environmental covariables for studying QTL by environment interaction. Euphytica 137:139-145.
24. Munkvold, J.D., J. Tanaka, D. Benscher, and M.E. Sorrells. 2009. Mapping quantitative trait loci for preharvest sprouting resistance in white wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 119:1223-1235.
25. Peighambari, S.A., B.Y. Samadi, A. Nabipour, G. Charmet, and A. Sarrafi. 2005. QTL analysis for agronomic traits in a barley doubled haploids population grown in Iran. Plant Sci. 169:1008-1013.
26. Piepho, H.-P. 2000. A mixed-model approach to mapping quantitative trait loci in barley on the basis of multiple environment data. Genetics 156:2043-2050.
27. Romagosa, I., F. Han, S.E. Ullrich, P.M. Hayes, and D.M. Wesenberg. 1999. Verification of yield QTL through realized molecular marker-assisted selection responses in a barley cross. Mol. Breed. 5:143-152.
28. Romagosa, I., S.E. Ullrich, F. Han, and P.M. Hayes. 1996. Use of the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model in QTL mapping for adaptation in barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93:30-37.
29. Stein, C. 1955. Inadmissibility of the usual estimator for the mean of a multivariate normal distribution. p. 197-206. In Proc. Berkeley Symp. on Math. Stat. and Probab., 3rd. Vol. 1. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.
30. Voltas, J., F. van Eeuwijk, E. Igartua, L.F. Garcia del Moral, J.L. Molina-Cano, and I. Romagosa. 2002. Genotype by environment interaction and adaptation in barley breeding: Basic concepts and methods of analysis. p. 205-241. In G.A. Slafer et al. (ed.) Barley science: Recent advances from molecular biology to agronomy of yield and quality. Haworth Press, New York.
31. Wang, S., C.J. Basten, and Z.-B. Zeng. 2007. Windows QTL cartographer 2.5. Available at http://statgen.ncsu.edu/qtlcart/WQTLCart.htm (verified 30 Sept. 2010). Dep. of Statistics, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.
32. Yin, X., P.C. Struik, F.A. van Eeuwijk, P. Stam, and J. Tang. 2005. QTL analysis and QTL-based prediction of flowering phenology in recombinant inbred lines of barley. J. Exp. Bot. 56:967-976.
33. Zeng, Z.-B. 1994. Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 136:1457-1466.
34. Zhang, M., K.L. Montooth, M.T. Wells, A.G. Clark, and D. Zhang. 2005. Mapping multiple quantitative trait loci by Bayesian classification. Genetics 169:2305-2318.
35. Zhu, H., G. Briceno, R. Dovel, P.M. Hayes, B.H. Liu, C.T. Liu, and S.E. Ullrich. 1999. Molecular breeding for grain yield in barley: An evaluation of QTL effects in a spring barley cross. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98:772-779.