EST-SSR Development from 5 lactuca species and their use in studying genetic diversity among L. serriola biotypes

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 17-28

  Riar, Dilpreet S ^a   Rustgi, Sachin ^a   Burke, Ian C ^a   Gill, Kulvinder S ^a   Yenish, Joseph P ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

2,4 D; EST SSR; Genetic diversity; Lactuca species

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOTYPE; COMPUTER MODEL; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HELIANTHUS ANNUUS; LACTUCA SERRIOLA; LETTUCE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMPLE SEQUENCE REPEAT; TRINUCLEOTIDE REPEAT;

2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID; DNA, PLANT; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, PLANT; HELIANTHUS; LETTUCE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; NORTHWESTERN UNITED STATES; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC;

HELIANTHUS ANNUUS; LACTUCA; LACTUCA SATIVA; LACTUCA SERRIOLA;

EID: 78650499834     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: 14657333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esq103     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Alcocer-Ruthling M, Thill DC, Mallory-Smith CA. 1992. Monitoring the occurrence of sulfonylurea-resistant prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol. 6:437-440.
2. Amor RL. 1986. Incidence and growth of prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola) in dryland crops in the Victorian Wimmera. Plant Prot Q. 1:148-151.
3. Bandopadhyay R, Sharma S, Rustgi S, Singh R, Kumar A, Balyan HS, Gupta PK. 2004. DNA polymorphism among 18 species of Triticum-Aegilops complex using wheat EST-SSRs. Plant Sci. 166:349-356.
4. Bar-Hen A, Charcosset A, Bourgoin M, Guiard J. 1995. Relationship between genetic markers and morphological traits in a maize inbred lines collection. Euphytica. 84:145-154.
5. Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW. 1980. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet. 32:314-331.
6. Burke IC, Yenish JP, Pittmann D, Gallagher RS. 2009. Resistance of a prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola) biotype to 2,4-D. Weed Technol. 23:586-591.
7. Cardle L, Ramsay L, Milbourne D, Macaulay M, Marshall D, Waugh R. 2000. Computational and experimental characterization of physically clustered simple sequence repeats in plants. Genetics. 156:847-854.
8. Dillmann C, Bar-Hen A, Guerin D, Charcosset A, Murigneux A. 1997. Comparison of RFLP and morphological distances between maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines-consequences for germplasm protection purposes. Theor Appl Genet. 95:92-102.
9. Ellis JR, Burke JM. 2007. EST-SSRs as a resource for population genetic analyses. Heredity. 99:125-132.
10. Eujayl I, Sorrells ME, Baum M, Wolters P, Powell W. 2002. Isolation of EST-derived microsatellite markers for genotyping the A and B genomes of wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 104:339-407.
11. Gallardo M, Jackson LE, Thompson RB. 1996. Shoot and root physiological responses to localized zones of soil moisture in cultivated and wild lettuce (Lactuca spp.). Plant Cell Environ. 19:1169-1179.
12. Gupta PK, Balyan HS, Sharma PC, Ramesh B. 1996. Microsatellites in plants: A new class of molecular markers. Curr Sci. 70:45-54.
13. Gupta PK, Rustgi S. 2004. Molecular markers from the transcribed/ expressed region of the genome in higher plants. Funct Integr Genomics. 4:139-162.
14. Gupta PK, Rustgi S, Kulwal PL. 2005. Linkage disequilibrium and association studies in higher plants: Present status and future prospects. Plant Mol Biol. 57:461-485.
15. Gupta PK, Rustgi S, Sharma S, Singh R, Kumar N, Balyan HS. 2003.Transferable EST-SSR markers for the study of polymorphism and genetic diversity. Mol Genet Genomics. 270:315-323.
16. Gupta PK, Varshney RK. 2000. The development and use of microsatellite markers for genetic analysis and plant breeding with emphasis on bread wheat. Euphytica. 113:163-185.
17. Hooftman DAP, de Jong MJ, Oostermeijer JGB, den Nijs JCM. 2007. Modeling the long-term consequences of crop-wild relative hybridization: A case study using four generations of hybrids. J Appl Ecol. 44:1035-1045.
18. Hu J, Ochoa OE, Truco MJ, Vick BA. 2005. Application of the TRAP technique to lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) genotyping. Euphytica. 244:225-235.
19. Jackson LE. 1995. Root architecture in cultivated and wild lettuce (Lactuca spp.). Plant Cell Environ. 18:885-894.
20. Jansen J, Verbakel H, Peleman J, van Hintum TJL. 2006. A note on the measurement of genetic diversity within genebank accessions of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) using AFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet. 112:554-561.
21. Jeuken M, van Wijk R, Peleman J, Lindhout P. 2001. An integrated interspecific AFLP map of lettuce (Lactuca) based on two L. sativa L. saligna F2 populations. Theor Appl Genet. 103:638-647.
22. Kesseli RV, Parant PI, Michelmore RW. 1994. Analysis of a detailed genetic linkage map of Lactuca sativa (Lettuce) constructed from RFLP and RAPD markers. Genetics. 136:1435-1446.
23. Koopman WJM, Zevenbergen MJ, Van den Berg RG. 2001. Species relationships in Lactuca s.l. (Lactuceae, Asteraceae) inferred from AFLP fingerprints. Am J Bot. 88:1881-1887.
24. Kuang H, van Eck HJ, Sicard D, Michelmore R, Nevo E. 2008. Evolution and genetic population structure of prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola) and its RGC2 resistance gene cluster. Genetics. 178:1547-1558.
25. Kumpatla SP, Mukhopadhyay S. 2005. Mining and survey of simple sequence repeats in expressed sequence tags of dicotyledonous species. Genome. 48:985-998.
26. Lefebvre V, Goffinet B, Chauvet JC, Caromel B, Signoret P, Brand R, Palloix A. 2001. Evaluation of genetic distances between pepper inbred lines for cultivar protection purposes: Comparison of AFLP, RAPD and phenotypic data. Theor Appl Genet. 102:741-750.
27. Maestri E, Malcevschi A, Massari A, Marmiroli N. 2002. Genome analysis of cultivated barley (Hordeum vulgare) using sequence tagged molecular markers. Estimates based on divergence based on RFLP and PCR markers derived from stress-responsive genes, and simple sequence repeats (SSRs). Mol Genet Genomics. 267:186-201.
28. Mallory-Smith CA, Thill DC, Dial MJ. 1990a. Development of sulfonylurea resistant lettuce Lactuca sativa L. Weed Sci Soc Am Abstr. 30:65.
29. Mallory-Smith CA, Thill DC, Dial MJ. 1990b. Identification of sulfonylureas herbicide-resistant prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola L.). Weed Technol. 4:163-168.
30. Mir RR, Rustgi S, Sharma S, Singh R, Goyal A, Kumar J, Gaur A, Tyagi AK, Khan H, Sinha MK, et al. 2008. A preliminary genetic analysis of fibre traits and the use of new genomic SSRs for genetic diversity in jute. Euphytica. 161:413-427.
31. Monteiro M, Santos C, Mann RM, Soares AMVM, Lopes T. 2007. Evaluation of cadmium genotoxicity in Lactuca sativa L. using nuclear microsatellites. Environ Exp Bot. 60:421-427.
32. Moreno-Vázquez S, Ochoa OE, Faber N. 2003. SNP-based codominant markers for a recessive gene conferring resistance to corky root rot (Rhizomonas suberifaciens) in lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Genome. 46:1059-1069.
33. Morgante M, Hanafey M, Powell W. 2002. Microsatellites are preferentially associated with non-repetitive DNA in plant genomes. Nat Genet. 30:194-200.
34. Mun JH, Kim DJ, Choi HK, Gish J, Debelle F, Mudge J, Denny R, Endre G, Saurat O, Dudez AM, et al. 2006. Distribution of microsatellites in the genome of Medicago truncatula: A resource of genetic markers that integrate genetic and physical maps. Genetics. 172:2541-2555.
35. Nevo E. 1998. Genetic diversity in wild cereals: Regional and local studies and their bearing on conservation ex-situ and in-situ. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 45:355-370.
36. Papa R, Attene G, Barcaccia G, Ohgata A, Konishi T. 1998. Genetic diversity in landrace populations of Hordeum vulgare L. from Sardinia, Italy, as revealed by RAPDs, isozymes and morphological traits. Plant Breed. 117:523-530.
37. Perrier X, Flori A, Bonnot F. 2003. Data analysis methods. In: Hamon P, Seguin M, Perrier X, Glaszmann JC, editors. Genetic diversity of cultivated tropical plants. Montpellier (France): Enfield, Science Publishers. p. 43-76.
38. Prince SD, Marks MK, Carter RN. 1978. Induction of flowering in wild lettuce (Lactuca serriola L.). New Phytol. 81:265-277.
39. Reed CF. 1970. Selected weeds of the United States. In Agriculture Handbook No. 366. Agriculture Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Washington DC. pp 463.
40. Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW. 1984. Ribosomal DNA spacer length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 81:8014-8018.
41. Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 4:406-425.
42. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Plainview (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
43. Schillinger WF, Papendick RI, Guy SO, Rasmussen PE, Kessel CV. 2003. Dryland cropping in western United States. In: Pacific Northwest Conservation Tillage Handbook Series No. 28. Chapter 2. Conservation Tillage systems and Equipment. [cited 2010 September 6]. Available from: Http://pnwsteep.wsu.edu/ tillagehandbook/chapter2/pdf/022804.pdf.
44. Simko I. 2009. Development of EST-SSR markers for the study of population structure in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L). J Hered. 100:256-262.
45. Sokal RR, Michener CD. 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ Kansas Sci Bull. 28:1409-1438.
46. Tegelstrom H. 1992. Detection of mitochondrial DNA fragments. In: Hoelzel AR, editor. Molecular genetic analysis of populations: A practical approach. Oxford: IRL Press. p. 89-114.
47. Thiel T, Michalek W, Varshney RK, Graner A. 2003. Exploiting EST database for the development and characterization of gene derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet. 106:411-422.
48. Truco MJ, Antonise R, Lavelle D, Ochoa O, Kozik A, Witsenboer H, Fort SB, Jeuken MJW, Kesseli RV, Lindhout P, et al. 2007. A high-density, integrated genetic linkage map of lettuce (Lactuca spp.). Theor Appl Genet. 115:735-746.
49. Uva RH, Neal JC, DiTomaso JM. 1997. Weeds of the Northeast. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press. p. 397.
50. Van de Wiel C, Arens P, Vosman B. 1999. Microsatellite retrieval in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Genome. 42:139-149.
51. Van Leeuwen H, Stoffe K, Kozik A, Cui X, Ashrafi H, McHale L, Lavelle D, Wong G, Chen F, Truco MJ, et al. 2009. High-density mapping of the lettuce genome with SFP markers in over 15,000 unigenes. Plant and Animal Genomes XVII Conference; January 10-14; Town and Country Convention Center, San Diego, CA. p. W126.
52. Varshney RK, Graner A, Sorrells ME. 2005. Genic microsatellite markers in plants: Features and applications. Trends Biotechnol. 23:48-55.
53. Vicente MJ, Conesa E, Franco JA, Esteva J, Martínez-Sánchez JJ. 2008. Genetic variability in lettuce (Lactuca sativa) germplasm using morphologic and molecular analyses. Acta Hortic. 782:59-66.
54. Waycott W, Fort SB. 1994. Differentiation of nearly identical germplasm accessions by a combination of molecular and morphologic analyses. Genome. 37:577-583.
55. Weaver S, Cluney K, Downs M, Page E. 2006. Prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola) interference and seed production in soybeans and winter wheat. Weed Sci. 54:496-503.
56. Weaver SE, Downs MP. 2003. The biology of Canadian weeds. 122. Lactuca serriola L. Can J Plant Sci. 83:619-628.
57. Werk KS, Ehleringer J. 1984. Non-random leaf orientation in Lactuca serriola L. Plant Cell Environ. 7:81-87.
58. Werk KS, Ehleringer J. 1986. Effect of nonrandom leaf orientation on reproduction in Lactuca serriola L. Evolution. 40:1334-1337.