Biomedical negation scope detection with conditional random fields

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 696-701

  Agarwal, Shashank ^a   Yu, Hong ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin Milwaukee   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICINE; CONDITIONAL RANDOM FIELD; LEARNING ALGORITHM; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PERFORMANCE; RECALL;

DATA MINING; HUMANS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 78650479527     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2010.003228     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Szarvas G, Vincze V, Farkas R, et al. The BioScope corpus: annotation for negation, uncertainty and their scope in biomedical texts. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Current Trends in Biomedical Natural Language Processing. Columbus, Ohio: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008:38-45.
2. Chapman WW, Bridewell W, Hanbury P, et al. A simple algorithm for identifying negated findings and diseases in discharge summaries. J Biomed Inform 2001;34:301-10.
3. Mutalik PG, Deshpande A, Nadkarni PM. Use of general-purpose negation detection to augment concept indexing of medical documents: a quantitative study using the UMLS. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001;8:598-609.
4. Elkin P, Brown S, Bauer B, et al. A controlled trial of automated classification of negation from clinical notes. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2005;5:13.
5. Auerbuch M, Karson TH, Ben-Ami B, et al. Context-sensitive medical information retrieval. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004;107:282-6.
6. Huang Y, Lowe HJ. A novel hybrid approach to automated negation detection in clinical radiology reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:304-11.
7. Sanchez-Graillet O, Poesio M. Negation of protein protein interactions: analysis and extraction. Bioinformatics 2007;23:i424-32.
8. Morante R, Daelemans W. A metalearning approach to processing the scope of negation. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. Boulder, Colorado: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009:21-9.
9. Yu H, Lee M, Kaufman D, et al. Development, implementation, and a cognitive evaluation of a definitional question answering system for physicians. J Biomed Inform 2007;40:236-51.
10. Yu H, Cao Y. Automatically extracting information needs from ad hoc clinical questions. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008:96-100.
11. Lafferty J, McCallum A, Pereira F. Conditional random fields: probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2001). Williamstown, MA, USA, 2001:282-9.
12. Settles B. ABNER: an open source tool for automatically tagging genes, proteins and other entity names in text. Bioinformatics 2005;21:3191-2.
13. Leaman R, Gonzalez G. BANNER: an executable survey of advances in biomedical named entity recognition. Pac Symp Biocomput 2008:652-63.
14. Katz S. Estimation of probabilities from sparse data for the language model component of a speech recognizer. IEEE Trans Acoust 1987;35:400-1.
15. Toutanova K, Manning C. Enriching the knowledge sources used in a maximum entropy part-of-speech tagger. In: Proceedings of the Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora (EMNLP/ VLC-2000). 2000:63-70.
16. Dagan I, Marcus S, Markovitch S. Contextual word similarity and estimation from sparse data. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Columbus, Ohio: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1993:164-71.
17. Yu H, Agichtein E. Extracting synonymous gene and protein terms from biological literature. Bioinformatics 2003;19:340-9.
18. Weiss SM, Kapouleas I. An empirical comparison of pattern recognition, neural nets, and machine learning classification methods. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Detroit, MI: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) 1989:781-7.
19. Blum A, Mitchell T. Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory. Madison, Wisconsin, United States: ACM, 1998:92-100.