Context-sensitive medical information retrieval

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 107, Issue , 2004, Pages 282-286

  Averbuch, Mordechai ^a   Karson, Tom H ^b   Ben Ami, Benjamin ^a   Maimon, Oded ^a   Rokach, Lior ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Information Management; Information Storage and Retrieval; Information Systems; Medical Informatics

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DIGITAL STORAGE; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SEARCH ENGINES; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

AUTOMATED LEARNING; CONTEXT IDENTIFICATION; CONTEXT SENSITIVE; CONTEXT-SENSITIVE RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL CONDITIONS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; RETRIEVED DOCUMENTS; CONTEXT-SENSITIVE; DISCHARGE SUMMARY; FREE TEXTS; MEDICAL DATA; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; RADIOLOGY REPORTS; RESEARCH PURPOSE;

MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS;

ADULT; ALGORITHM; CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SYSTEM; LEARNING; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; NARRATIVE; NULL RESULT; RECALL;

EID: 78650455419     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-949-3-282     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Pratt A.W. Medicine, computers, and linguistics. Advanced Biomedical Engineering 1973: 3:97-140.
2. Hersh W, Hickam D. A comparison of retrieval effectiveness for three methods of indexing medical literature. American Journal of Medical Science 1992: 303:292-300.
3. Hersh WR, Hickam DH. Information retrieval in medicine: the SAPHIRE experience. Journal of the American Society of Information Science 1995: 46:743-7.
4. Nadkarni PM. Information retrieval in medicine: overview and applications. J Postgraduate Medicine 2000: 46 (2).
5. Mutalik PG, Deshpande A, Nadkarni PM. Use of general-purpose negation detection to augment concept indexing of medical documents: a quantitative study using the UMLS. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001: 8(6): 598-609.
6. Chapman WW, Bridewell W, Hanbury P, Cooper GF, Buchanann BG. A Simple Algorithm for Identifying Negated Findings and Diseases in Discharge Summaries. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2001: 34: 301-310.
7. Murff HJ, Forster AJ, Peterson JF, Fiskio JM, Heiman HL, Bates DW. Electronically Screening Discharge Summaries for Adverse Medical Events. J Am Med Info Assoc 2003: 10 (4): 339-350.
8. Van Rijsbergen, CJ. Information Retrieval 2nd edition, London, Butterworths, 1979.
9. Lindbergh DAB. Humphreys BL. The Unified Medical Language System. In: van Bemmel JH and McCray AT, eds. 1993 Yearbook of Medical Informatics. IMIA, the Netherlands, 1993; pp. 41-51.
10. Quinlan, J. R. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
11. Richard Duda and Peter Hart. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. Wiley, New York, 1973.
12. S.S. Keerthi, S.K. Shevade, C. Bhattacharyya, K.R.K. Murth, Improvements to Piatt's SMO Algorithm for SVM Classifier Design. Neural Computat 2001: 13(3): 637-649.
13. Cessie, S. and van Houwelingen, J.C. Ridge Estimators in Logistic Regression. Appl Statistics 1997:41(1): 191-201.
14. Dietterich, T., Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Computation 1998: 10: 1895-1924.