Engagement and learning: An exploratory study of situated practice in multi-disciplinary stroke rehabilitation

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 270-279

  Horton, Simon ^a   Howell, Alison ^b   Humby, Kate ^c   Ross, Alexandra ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b Norfolk PCT   (United Kingdom)

^c Great Yarmouth and Waveney PCT   (United Kingdom)

^d United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Engagement; learning; multi disciplinary; rehabilitation; stroke

Indexed keywords

APHASIA; ARTICLE; DYSARTHRIA; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEARNING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSIOTHERAPY; SPEECH THERAPY; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEORECORDING;

APHASIA; COMMUNICATION; DYSARTHRIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; SAMPLING STUDIES; SPEECH THERAPY; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 78650473174     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2010.524270     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Kalra L, Langhorne P. Facilitating recovery: evidence for organised stroke care. J Rehabil Med 2007;39:97-102.
2. Wade D. Describing rehabilitation interventions. Clin Rehabil 2005;19:811-818.
3. Proot IM, ter Meulen RH, Abu Saad HH, Crebolder HFJM. Supporting stroke patients' autonomy during rehabilitation. Nurs Ethics 2007;14:229-241.
4. Pyö riä O, Talvitie U, Nyrkko H, Kautiainen H, Pohjolainen T, Kasper V. The effect of two physiotherapy approaches on physical and cognitive functions and independent coping at home in stroke rehabilitation. A preliminary follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:503-511.
5. Lequerica AH, Donnell CS, Tate DG. Patient engagement in rehabilitation therapy: physical and occupational therapist impressions. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:753-760.
6. Coulter S, Ellins, J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. Br Med J 2007;335:24-27.
7. Drew P, Chatwin J, Collins S. Conversation analysis: a method for research into interactions between patients and healthcare professionals. Health Expect 2001;4:58-70.
8. Collins S, Britten N, Ruusuvuori J, Thompson A. Understanding the process of patient participation. In: Collins S, Britten N, Ruusuvuori J, Thompson A, editors. Patient participation in health care consultations. Qualitative perspectives. Maidenhead: McGraw H-Hill Education; 2007;3-21.
9. Barry CA, Stevenson FA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley CP. Giving voice to the lifeworld. More humane, more effective medical care? A qualitative study of doctor-patient communication in general practice. Soc Sci Med 2001;53:487-505.
10. Roberts C, Sarangi S. Theme-oriented discourse analysis of medical encounters. Med Educ 2005;39:632-640.
11. McCabe R, Heath C, Burns T, Priebe S. Engagement of patients with psychosis in the consultation: conversation analytic study. Br Med J 2002;325:1148-1151.
12. Arminen I. On the context sensitivity of institutional interaction. Discourse Soc 2000;11:435-458.
13. Gafaranga J, Britten N. Patient participation in formulating and opening sequences. In: Collins S, Britten N, Ruusuvuori J, Thompson A, editors. Patient participation in health care consultations. Qualitative perspectives. Maidenhead: McGraw H-Hill Education; 2007.
14. Heath C, Hindmarsh J. Analysing interaction: video, ethnography and situated conduct. In: May T, editor. Qualitative research in action. London: Sage; 2002;104-120.
15. Parry RH. The interactional management of patients' physical incompetence: a conversation analytic study of physiotherapy interactions. Sociol Health Illn 2004;26:976-1007.
16. Simmons Mackie N and Kovarsky D. Engagement in clinical interaction: an introduction. Semin Speech Lang 2009;30:5-10.
17. Simmons-Mackie NN and Damico JS. Access and social inclusion in aphasia: interactional principles and applications. Aphasiology 2007;21:81-97.
18. Maynard DW. On clinicians co-implicating recipients' perspective in the delivery of diagnostic news. In: Drew P, Heritage J, editors. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
19. Martin C. Relevance of situational context in studying learning as changing participation. Scand J Educ Res 2009; 53:133-149.
20. Horton S. Learning-in-interaction: resourceful work by people with aphasia and therapists in the course of language impairment therapy. Aphasiology 2008;22:985-1014.
21. Hengst JA, Duff MC, Dettmer A. Rethinking repetition in therapy: Repeated engagement as the social ground of learning. Aphasiology. 2010;(iFirst):http:// dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/02687030903478330.
22. Hopper T, Holland AL. Aphasia and learning in adults. Key concepts and clinical considerations. Top Geriatr Rehabil 2005;21:315-322.
23. Kimbarow ML Integrating life participation approaches to aphasia treatment with adult learning theory: a synergistic approach. Top Lang Disord 2007;27:318-323.
24. Magill RA. Motor learning and control. Concepts and applications. 9th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2011.
25. Winstein C, Wing AM, Whitall J. Motor control and learning principles for rehabilitation of upper limb movements after brain injury. In: Grafman J, Robertson IH, editors. Handbook of neuropsychology. 2nd edition. Vol. 9. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV; 2003;77-137.
26. Heritage J. Conversation analysis and institutional talk: analysing data. In: Silverman D, editor. Qualitative research: theory, method and practice. London: Sage; 1997;161-182.
27. Parry RH. Practitioners' accounts for treatment actions and recommendations in physiotherapy: when do they occur, how are they structured, what do they do? Sociol Health Illn 2009;31:835-853.
28. Simmons-Mackie N, Damico JS, Damico HL. A qualitative study of feedback in aphasia treatment. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1999;8:218-230.
29. Peräkylä A, Ruusuvuori J. Components of participation in health care consultations. A conceptual model for research. In: Collins S, Britten N, Ruusuvuori J, Thompson A, editors. Patient participation in health care consultations. Qualitative perspectives. Maidenhead: McGraw H-Hill Education; 2007;167-175.
30. Atkinson JH, Heritage J. Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.