Comparative genomics of clinical and environmental Vibrio mimicus

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 107, Issue 49, 2010, Pages 21134-21139

  Hasan, Nur A ^a   Grim, Christopher J ^a,b,i   Haley, Bradd J ^a   Chun, Jongsik ^c   Alam, Munirul ^d,e   Taviani, Elisa ^a   Hoq, Mozammel ^f   Munk, A Christine ^g   Saunders, Elizabeth ^g   Brettin, Thomas S ^g   Bruce, David C ^g   Challacombe, Jean F ^g   Detter, J Chris ^g   Han, Cliff S ^g   Xie, Gary ^g   Nair, G Balakrish ^h   Huq, Anwar ^a   Colwell, Rita R ^a,b  

^a University of Maryland   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^d International Vaccine Institute   (South Korea)

^e INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DIARRHOEAL DISEASE RESEARCH   (Bangladesh)

^f UNIVERSITY OF DHAKA   (Bangladesh)

^g LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^h NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHOLERA AND ENTERIC DISEASES   (India)

ⁱ CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CHROMOSOME; BACTERIAL GENETICS; BACTERIAL VIRULENCE; BACTERIUM ISOLATE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; GENOMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VIBRIO CHOLERAE; VIBRIO MIMICUS;

CHROMOSOMES, BACTERIAL; GENES, BACTERIAL; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENOME, BACTERIAL; GENOMICS; SYNTENY; VIBRIO CHOLERAE; VIBRIO MIMICUS;

VIBRIO; VIBRIO CHOLERAE; VIBRIO MIMICUS;

EID: 78650463454     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1013825107     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Davis BR, et al. (1981) Characterization of biochemically atypical Vibrio cholerae strains and designation of a new pathogenic species, Vibrio mimicus. J Clin Microbiol 14:631-639.
2. Boyd EF, Moyer KE, Shi L, Waldor MK (2000) Infectious CTXPhi and the vibrio pathogenicity island prophage in Vibrio mimicus: Evidence for recent horizontal transfer between V. mimicus and V. cholerae. Infect Immun 68:1507-1513.
3. Byun R, Elbourne LD, Lan R, Reeves PR (1999) Evolutionary relationships of pathogenic clones of Vibrio cholerae by sequence analysis of four housekeeping genes. Infect Immun 67:1116-1124.
4. Chowdhury MA, Yamanaka H, Miyoshi S, Aziz KM, Shinoda S (1989) Ecology of Vibrio mimicus in aquatic environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:2073-2078.
5. Chowdhury MA, Aziz KM, Kay BA, Rahim Z (1987) Toxin production by Vibrio mimicus strains isolated from human and environmental sources in Bangladesh. J Clin Microbiol 25:2200-2203.
6. Colwell RR, Huq A (1994) Environmental reservoir of Vibrio cholerae. The causative agent of cholera. Disease in Evolution: Global Changes and Emergence of Infectious Diseases, eds Wilson ME, Levins R, Spielman A (Ann. New York Acad. Sci, New York), Vol 740, pp 44-54.
7. Campos E, et al. (1996) Vibrio mimicus diarrhea following ingestion of raw turtle eggs. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:1141-1144.
8. Chowdhury MA, Hill RT, Colwell RR (1994) A gene for the enterotoxin zonula occludens toxin is present in Vibrio mimicus and Vibrio cholerae O139. FEMS Microbiol Lett 119:377-380.
9. Shi L, et al. (1998) Detection of genes encoding cholera toxin (CT), zonula occludens toxin (ZOT), accessory cholera enterotoxin (ACE) and heat-stable enterotoxin (ST) in Vibrio mimicus clinical strains. Microbiol Immunol 42:823-828.
10. Spira WM, Fedorka-Cray PJ (1984) Purification of enterotoxins from Vibrio mimicus that appear to be identical to cholera toxin. Infect Immun 45:679-684.
11. Nishibuchi M, Seidler RJ (1983) Medium-dependent production of extracellular enterotoxins by non-O-1 Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio mimicus, and Vibrio fluvialis. Appl Environ Microbiol 45:228-231.
12. Gyobu Y, Kodama H, Uetake H (1988) Production and partial purification of a fluidaccumulating factor of non-O1 Vibrio cholerae. Microbiol Immunol 32:565-577.
13. Nishibuchi M, Khaeomanee-iam V, Honda T, Kaper JB, Miwatani T (1990) Comparative analysis of the hemolysin genes of Vibrio cholerae non-01, V. mimicus, and V. hollisae that are similar to the tdh gene of V. parahaemolyticus. FEMS Microbiol Lett 55:251-256.
14. Chowdhury MA, Miyoshi S, Shinoda S (1990) Purification and characterization of a protease produced by Vibrio mimicus. Infect Immun 58:4159-4162.
15. Kang JH, Lee JH, Park JH, Huh SH, Kong IS (1998) Cloning and identification of a phospholipase gene from Vibrio mimicus. Biochim Biophys Acta 1394:85-89.
16. Shaw JF, et al. (1994) Nucleotide sequence of a novel arylesterase gene from Vibro mimicus and characterization of the enzyme expressed in Escherichia coli. Biochem J 298:675-680.
17. Okujo N, Yamamoto S (1994) Identification of the siderophores from Vibrio hollisae and Vibrio mimicus as aerobactin. FEMS Microbiol Lett 118:187-192.
18. Alam M, Miyoshi S, Maruo I, Ogawa C, Shinoda S (1994) Existence of a novel hemagglutinin having no protease activity in Vibrio mimicus. Microbiol Immunol 38: 467-470.
19. Mazel D, Dychinco B, Webb VA, Davies J (1998) A distinctive class of integron in the Vibrio cholerae genome. Science 280:605-608.
20. Heidelberg JF, et al. (2000) DNA sequence of both chromosomes of the cholera pathogen Vibrio cholerae. Nature 406:477-483.
21. Rowe-Magnus DA, Guérout AM, Mazel D (1999) Super-integrons. Res Microbiol 150: 641-651.
22. Rowe-Magnus DA, et al. (2001) The evolutionary history of chromosomal superintegrons provides an ancestry for multiresistant integrons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 652-657.
23. Chun J, et al. (2009) Comparative genomics reveals mechanism for short-term and long-term clonal transitions in pandemic Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 15442-15447.
24. Rasko DA, et al. (2008) The pangenome structure of Escherichia coli: Comparative genomic analysis of E. coli commensal and pathogenic isolates. J Bacteriol 190: 6881-6893.
25. Langille MGI, Brinkman FSL (2009) IslandViewer: An integrated interface for computational identification and visualization of genomic islands. Bioinformatics 25: 664-665.
26. Kurtz S, et al. (2004) Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol 5:R12.
27. Carver TJ, et al. (2005) ACT: The Artemis comparison tool. Bioinformatics 21:3422-3423.
28. Jermyn WS, Boyd EF (2002) Characterization of a novel Vibrio pathogenicity island (VPI-2) encoding neuraminidase (nanH) among toxigenic Vibrio cholerae isolates. Microbiology 148:3681-3693.
29. Smith B, Oliver JD (2006) In situ and in vitro gene expression by Vibrio vulnificus during entry into, persistence within, and resuscitation from the viable but nonculturable state. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1445-1451.
30. Larkin MA, et al. (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947-2948.
31. Vaitkevicius K, et al. (2006) A Vibrio cholerae protease needed for killing of Caenorhabditis elegans has a role in protection from natural predator grazing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:9280-9285.
32. Sauer FG, Mulvey MA, Schilling JD, Martinez JJ, Hultgren SJ (2000) Bacterial pili: Molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis. Curr Opin Microbiol 3:65-72.
33. O'Toole GA, Kolter R (1998) Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Mol Microbiol 30:295-304.
34. Marsh JW, Taylor RK (1999) Genetic and transcriptional analyses of the Vibrio cholerae mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin type 4 pilus gene locus. J Bacteriol 181: 1110-1117.
35. Chiavelli DA, Marsh JW, Taylor RK (2001) The mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin of Vibrio cholerae promotes adherence to zooplankton. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 3220-3225.
36. Watnick PI, Fullner KJ, Kolter R (1999) A role for the mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin in biofilm formation by Vibrio cholerae El Tor. J Bacteriol 181:3606-3609.
37. Watnick PI, Kolter R (1999) Steps in the development of a Vibrio cholerae El Tor biofilm. Mol Microbiol 34:586-595.
38. Alam M, Miyoshi S, Tomochika K, Shinoda S (1997) Vibrio mimicus attaches to the intestinal mucosa by outer membrane hemagglutinins specific to polypeptide moieties of glycoproteins. Infect Immun 65:3662-3665.
39. Faruque SM, et al. (2005) Genomic sequence and receptor for the Vibrio cholerae phage KSF-1phi: Evolutionary divergence among filamentous vibriophages mediating lateral gene transfer. J Bacteriol 187:4095-4103.
40. Campos J, et al. (2003) VGJ phi, a novel filamentous phage of Vibrio cholerae, integrates into the same chromosomal site as CTX phi. J Bacteriol 185:5685-5696.
41. Honma Y, Ikema M, Toma C, Ehara M, Iwanaga M (1997) Molecular analysis of a filamentous phage (fsl) of Vibrio cholerae O139. Biochim Biophys Acta 1362: 109-115. (Pubitemid 28164164)
42. Ikema M, Honma Y (1998) A novel filamentous phage, fs-2, of Vibrio cholerae O139. Microbiology 144:1901-1906. (Pubitemid 28372022)
43. Jouravleva EA, et al. (1998) The Vibrio cholerae mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin is the receptor for a filamentous bacteriophage from V. cholerae O139. Infect Immun 66:2535-2539.
44. Haley BJ, et al. (2010) Comparative genomic analysis reveals evidence of two novel Vibrio species closely related to V. cholerae. BMC Microbiol 10:154.
45. Ewing B, Green P (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res 8:186-194. (Pubitemid 28177230)
46. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 8:175-185. (Pubitemid 28177229)
47. Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P (1998) Consed: A graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res 8:195-202.
48. Han CS, Chain P (2006) Finishing repeat regions automatically with Dupfinisher. International Conference on Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, eds Arabnia HR, Valafar H (CSREA Press, Livermore, CA), pp 141-146.
49. Aziz RK, et al. (2008) The RAST Server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75.
50. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM (2005) Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:2567-2572.
51. Benson G (1999) Tandem repeats finder: A program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 27:573-580.
52. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406-425.
53. KimuraM(1980)Asimplemethod for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111-120.
54. Kumar S, Nei M, Dudley J, Tamura K (2008) MEGA: A biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinform 9:299-306.