Conversation Analysis and Communication Disorders

The Handbook of Clinical Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 92-106

  Wilkinson, Ray ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acquired communication disorders; Aphasia first communication disorder; Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems and voice output communication aids (VOCAs); CA approach to analysis of linguistic and clinical linguistic phenomena; Conversation analysis (CA) within field of communication disorders; Developmental communication disorders; Organization of repair in talk in area of CA; Work on repair in normal talk for clinical linguistics

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650458007     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444301007.ch6     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Acton, C. (2004). A conversation analytic perspective on stammering: Some reflections and observations. Stammering Research, 1(3), 249-70.
2. Bloch, S. (2005). Co-constructing meaning in acquired speech disorders: Word and letter repetition in the construction of turns. In K. Richards and P. Seedhouse (eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis (pp. 38-55). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
3. Bloch, S. and Wilkinson, R. (2004). The understandability of AAC: A conversation analytic study of acquired dysarthria. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(4), 272-82.
4. Body, R. and Parker, M. (2005). Topic repetitiveness after traumatic brain injury: An emergent, jointly managed behaviour. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19(5), 379-92.
5. Booth, S. and Perkins, L. (1999). The use of conversation analysis to guide individualised advice to carers and evaluate change in aphasia: A case study. Aphasiology, 13(4-5), 283-304.
6. Button, G. and Casey, N. (1985). Topic nomination and topic pursuit. Human Studies, 8, 3-55.
7. Collins, S. (1996). Referring expressions in conversations between aided and natural speakers. In S. Von Tetzchner and M. H. Jehnsen (eds.), Augmentative and Alternative Communication: European Perspectives (pp. 89-100). London: Whurr.
8. Collins, S., Markovà, I., and Murphy, J. (1997). Bringing conversations to a close: The management of closings in interactions between AAC users and 'natural' speakers. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 11, 467-93.
9. Damico, J. S. and Nelson, R. L. (2005). Interpreting problematic behaviour: Systematic compensatory adaptations as emergent phenomena in autism. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19(5), 405-17.
10. Dickerson, P., Rae, J., Stribling, P., Dautenhahn, K., and Werry, I. (2005). Autistic children's co-ordination of gaze and talk: Re-examining the 'asocial' autist. In K. Richards and P. Seedhouse (eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis (pp. 19-37). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
11. Dobbinson, S., Perkins, M., and Boucher, J. (2003). The interactional significance of formulas in autistic language. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 17(4-5), 299-307.
12. Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., and Thompson, S. A. (eds.) (2002). The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 97-121). New York: Irvington.
14. Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 233-60.
15. Goodwin, C. (2003). Conversational frameworks for the accomplishment of meaning in aphasia. In C. Goodwin (ed.), Conversation and Brain Damage (pp. 90-116). New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Heeschen, C. and Schegloff, E. A. (1999). Agrammatism, adaptation theory, conversation analysis: On the role of so-called telegraphic style in talk-in-interaction. Aphasiology, 13(4/5), 365-406.
17. Heeschen, C. and Schegloff, E. A. (2003). Aphasic agrammatism as interactional artifact and achievement. In C. Goodwin (ed.), Conversation and Brain Damage (pp. 231-82). New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
19. Jefferson, G. (1989). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a 'standard maximum' silence of approximately one second in conversation. In D. Roger and P. Bull (eds.), Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 166-96). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
20. Laakso, M. and Klippi, A. (1999). A closer look at the 'hint and guess' sequences in aphasic conversation. Aphasiology, 13(4-5), 345-64.
21. Lerner, G. (1996). On the 'semi-permeable' character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, and S. A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp. 238-76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Local, J. and Wootton, A. (1995). Interactional and phonetic aspects of immediate echolalia in autism: A case study. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 9(2), 155-84.
24. Lock, S., Wilkinson, R., and Bryan, K. (2001). SPPARC (Supporting Partners of People with Aphasia in Relationships and Conversation): A Resource Pack. Bicester, Oxon: Speechmark.
25. Oelschlager, M. and Damico, J. (2003). Word searches in aphasia: A study of the collaborative responses of communicative partners. In C. Goodwin (ed.), Conversation and Brain Damage (pp. 211-30). New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Perkins, L., Whitworth, A., and Lesser R. (1998). Conversing in dementia: A conversation analytic approach. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11, 33-53.
27. Perkins, M., Body, R., and Parker, M. (1995). Closed head injury: Assessment and remediation of topic bias and repetitiveness. In M. Perkins and S. Howard (eds.), Case Studies in Clinical Linguistics (pp. 293-320). London: Whurr.
28. Radford, J. and Tarplee, C. (2000). The management of conversational topic by a ten year old with pragmatic difficulties. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 14(5), 387-403.
29. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
30. Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: some uses of 'uh huh' and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (ed.), Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics (pp. 71-93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
31. Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, and S. A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp. 52-133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., and Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair for conversation. Language, 53, 361-82.
33. Smith, B. R. and Leinonen, E. (1992). Clinical Pragmatics: Unravelling the Complexities of Communicative Failure. London: Chapman and Hall.
34. Spilkin, M. and Bethlehem, D. (2003). A conversation analysis approach to facilitating communication with memory books. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 5(2), 105-18.
35. Tarplee, C. and Barrow, E. (1999). Delayed echoing as an interactional resource: A case study of a three year old child on the autistic spectrum. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 13(6), 449-82.
36. Tetnowski, J. A. and Damico, J. S. (2001). A demonstration of the advantages of qualitative methodologies in stuttering research. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 26, 1-26.
37. Wilkinson, R. (1999). Sequentiality as a problem and a resource for intersubjectivity in aphasic conversation: Analysis and implications for therapy. Aphasiology, 13(4-5), 327-43.
38. Wilkinson, R., Beeke, S., and Maxim, J. (2003). Adapting to conversation: On the use of linguistic resources by speakers with fluent aphasia in the construction of turns at talk. In C. Goodwin (ed.), Conversation and Brain Damage (pp. 59-89). New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Wootton, A. (1999). An investigation of delayed echoing in a child with autism. First Language, 19, 359-81.