Models of child birth care and cesarean rates in different countries;Modelos de assistência ao parto e taxa de cesárea em diferentes países

Revista de Saude Publica

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 185-194

  Patah, Luciano Eduardo Maluf ^a   Malik, Ana Maria ^a  

^a FUNDAÇÃO GETÚLIO VARGAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cesarean section; Perinatal care; Review; Statistics numerical data; Trends

Indexed keywords

BRAZIL; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PREGNANCY; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

BRAZIL; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; TECHNOLOGY, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 78650455642     PISSN: 00348910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0034-89102011000100007     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Al-Mufti R, Mccarthy A, Fisk NM. Survey of obstetricians' personal preference and discretionary practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997;73(1):1-4. DOI:10.1016/S0301-2115(96)02692-9
2. Alves B, Sheikh A. Investigating the relationship between affluence and elective caesarean sections. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112(7):994-6.
3. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Ethics. ACOG Committee Opinion #321: Maternal decision making, ethics, and the law. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(5Pt1):1127-37.
4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee Opinion. Surgery and patient choice: the ethics of decision making. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(5Pt 1):1101-6. DOI:10.1016/j. obstetgynecol.2003.09.030
5. Barbosa GP, Giffin K, Ângulo-Tuesta A, Gama AS, Chor D, D'orsi E, et al. Parto cesáreo: Quem o deseja? Em quais circunstâncias? Cad Saude Publica. 2003;19(6):1611-20. DOI:10.1590/S0102-311X2003000600006
6. Barros FC, Vaugham JP, Victora CG. Why so many caesarean sections? The need for a further policy change in Brazil. Health Policy Plan. 1986;1(1):19-29. DOI:10.1093/heapol/1.1.19
7. Bergholt T, Ostberg B, Legarth J, Weber T. Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83(3):262-6.
8. Bost BW. Cesarean delivery on demand: what will it cost? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(6):1418-23. DOI:10.1067/mob.2003.455
9. Caesarean section on the rise. Lancet. 2000;356(9423):1697. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03196-2
10. Chandraharan E, Arulkumaran S. Medicolegal problems in obstetrics. Curr Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;16(4):206-10. DOI:10.1016/j. curobgyn.2006.05.003
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Vital Statistics System. Birth Data 2007. Disponível em http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/births.htm.
12. Dias MAB, Deslandes SF. Cesarianas: percepção de risco e sua indicação pelo obstetra em uma maternidade pública no Município de São Paulo. Cad Saude Publica. 2004;20(1):109-16. DOI:10.1590/S0102-311X2004000100025
13. Diniz CSG. Humanização da assistência ao parto no Brasil: os muitos sentidos de um movimento. Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2005;10(3):627-37. DOI: 10.1590/S1413-81232005000300019
14. Domingues RMS, Santos EM, Leal MC. Aspectos da satisfação das mulheres com assistência ao parto: contribuição para o debate. Cad Saude Publica. 2004;20Suppl1:S52-62. DOI:10.1590/S0102-311X2004000700006
15. D'Orsi E, Chor D, Giffin K, Ângulo-Tuesta A, Barbosa GP, Gama AS, et al. Qualidade da atenção ao parto em maternidades do Rio de Janeiro. Rev Saude Publica. 2005;39(4):646-54. DOI:10.1590/S0034-89102005000400020
16. Dumond A, de Bernis L, Bouvier-Colle MH, Bréart G. Caesarean section rate for maternal indication in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Lancet. 2001;358: 1328-334.
17. Faúndes A, Pádua KS, Osis MJD, Cecatti JG, Souza MH. Opinião de mulheres e médicos brasileiros sobre a preferência pela via de parto. Rev Saude Publica. 2004;38(4):488-94. DOI:10.1590/S0034-89102004000400002
18. Feldman GB, Freiman JA. Prophylactic cesarean at term? N Engl J Med. 1985;312(19):1264-7. DOI:10.1056/NEJM198505093121926
19. Flamm BL. 2004 C-section rate is all-time U.S. high at 29%: medical, legal, and choice issues combine. Obstet Gynecol News. 2004;40:1-3.
20. Freitas PF, Drachler ML, Leite JCC, Grassi PR. Desigualdade social nas taxas de cesariana em primíparas no Rio Grande do Sul. Rev Saude Publica. 2005;39(5):761-7. DOI:10.1590/S0034-89102005000500010
21. Gomes UA, Silva AM, Bettiol H, Barbieri MA. Risk factors for the increasing cesarean section rate in Southeast Brazil: a comparison of two birth cohorts, 1978-1979 and 1994. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28(4):687-94. DOI:10.1093/ije/28.4.687
22. Grant D. Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured? Health Care Manag Sci. 2005;8(1):5-17. DOI:10.1007/s10729-005-5212-7
23. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. National Vital Statistics Report. Births: data for 2007. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007;57(12):1-23.
24. Hotimsky SN, Rattner D, Venancio SI, Bogus CM, Miranda MM. O parto como eu vejo... ou como eu o desejo? Expectativas de gestantes, usuárias do SUS, acerca do parto e da assistência obstétrica. Cad Saude Publica. 2002;18(5):1303-11. DOI:10.1590/S0102-311X2002000500023
25. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health. J Obstet Gynecol Res. 1999;25(4):5-9.
26. Kwee A, Cohlen BJ, Kahnai HH, Bruinse HW, Visser GH. Caesarean section on request: a survey in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004; 113(2):186-90. DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.09.017
27. Leeman ML, Plante LA. Patient-choice vaginal delivery? Ann Fam Med. 2006;4(3):265-8. DOI:10.1370/afm.537
28. Lurie S, Glezerman M. The history of cesarean technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(6):1803-6. DOI:10.1016/S0002-9378(03)00856-1
29. Lurie S. The changing motives of cesarean section: from the ancient world to the twenty-first century. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;271(4):281-5. DOI:10.1007/s00404-005-0724-4
30. McCandlish R. Meeting maternal request for caesarean section: paving the road to hell? Midwifery. 2006; 22(3):204-6. DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2006.06.002
31. Mead M, Bogaerts A, Reyns M. Midwives' perception of the intrapartum risk of healthy nulliparae in spontaneous labour, in the Flanders, Belgium. Midwifery. 2007;23(4):361-71. DOI:10.1016/j. midw.2006.05.003. 2006
32. Menacker F, Curtin SC. Trends in cesarean birth and vaginal birth after previous cesarean, 1991-99. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2001;49(13):1-15.
33. Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF. Cesarean delivery: background, trends and epidemiology. Semin Perinatol. 2006;30(5):235-41. DOI:10.1053/j. semperi.2006.07.002
34. Mendoza-Sassi RA, Cesar JA, Silva PR, Denardin G, Rodrigues MM. Risk factors for cesarean section by category of health service. Rev Saude Publica. 2010;44(1):80-9. DOI:10.1590/S0034-89102010000100009
35. Okonofua F. Optimising caesarean-section rates in west Africa. Lancet. 2001;358(9290):1289. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06456-X
36. Osis MJD, Padua KS, Duarte GA, Souza TR, Faúndes A. The opinion of Brazilian women regarding vaginal labor and cesarean section. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2001;75(Suppl 1):S59-66. DOI:10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00518-5
37. Rezende J. Operação cesariana. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 1969. Obstetrícia; p.952-91.
38. Robson SJ, Tan WS, Adeyemi A, Dear KB. Estimating the rate of cesarean section by maternal request: anonymous survey of obstetricians in Australia. Birth. 2009;36(3):208-12. DOI:10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00331.x
39. Shearer EL. Cesarean section: medical benefits and costs. Soc Sci Med. 1983;37(10): 1223-31. DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(93)90334-Z
40. State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on cesarean delivery on maternal request. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2006;23(1):1-29.
41. Turcotte L, Robst J, Polachek S. Medicaid coverage and medical interventions during pregnancy. Int J Health Care Finan Econ. 2005;5(3):255-71. DOI:10.1007/s10754-005-1789-0
42. Wagner M. Choosing caesarean section. Lancet. 2000;356(9242):1677-80. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03169-X
43. Wagner M. Fish can't see water. The need to humanize birth. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2001;75(Suppl 1):S25-37. DOI:10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00519-7
44. World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985; 2(8452):436-7.