Brazilian women and physicians' viewpoints on their preferred route of delivery;Opinião de mulheres e médicos brasileiros sobre a preferência pela via de parto

Revista de Saude Publica

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 488-494

  Faúndes, Aníbal ^a   de Pádua, Karla Simônia ^a   Duarte Osis, Maria José ^a   Cecatti, José Guilherme ^b   de Sousa, Maria Helena ^a  

^a 13084 971 Brazil   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cesarean section; Interviews; Knowledge, attitudes, practice; Natural childbirth; Physicians; Women

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CESAREAN SECTION; CHI SQUARE TEST; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEAR; FEMALE; FISHER EXACT TEST; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; MANTEL HAENSZEL TEST; MATERNAL BEHAVIOR; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; QUESTIONNAIRE; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

EID: 4544237511     PISSN: 00348910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89102004000400002     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Althabe F. Segunda opinião como estratégia para redução das cesáreas. In: Simpósio Internacional Cesárea: Avaliação e Propostas de Ação; 2002 set 5-6; Campinas, SP, Brasil [on-line]. Disponível em: http://www.cemicamp.org.br/apresentacoes/7Fernando.pdf [2003 jan 22]
2. Cotzias CS, Paterson-Brown S, Fisk NM. Obstetricians say yes to maternal request for elective caesarean section: a survey of current opinion. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001;97:15-6.
3. Faúndes A, Cecatti JG. A operação cesárea no Brasil: incidência, tendências, causas, conseqüê ncias e propostas de ação. Cad Saúde Pública 1991;7:150-73.
4. Harer WB. Patient choice cesarean [editorial]. ACOG Clin Rev 2000;5(2):1,13,15-6.
5. Hopkins K. Are Brazilian women really choosing to deliver by cesarean? Soc Sci Med 2000;51:725-40.
6. Mello e Souza C. C-sections as ideal births: the cultural constructions of beneficence and patient's rights in Brazil. Camb Q Health Ethics 1994;3:358-66.
7. Myers SA, Gleicher N. A succesful program to lower cesarean-section rates. N Engl J Med 1988;319:1511-6.
8. Neiva JG. Índice de cesariana. Femina 1981;9:516-8.
9. Osis MJD, Pádua KS, Duarte GA, Souza TR, Faúndes A. The opinion of Brazilian women regarding vaginal labor and cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001;75:S59-S66.
10. Perpétuo lHO, Bessa GH, Fonseca MC. Parto cesáreo: uma análise da perspectiva das mulheres de Belo Horizonte. In: Anais do XI Encontro Nacional de Estudos Populacionais da Associaç ão Brasileira de Estudos Populacionais [ABEP]; 1998; Caxambu, MG. Belo Horizonte: ABEP; 1998. p. 95-119.
11. Pinotti JA, Faundes A. As distorções da cesariana. Rev Paul Hosp 1988;36:73-4.
12. Potter JE, Berquó E, Perpétuo lHO, Leal OF, Hopkins K, Souza MR et al. Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: prospective study. BMJ 2001;323:1155-8.
13. Wolfe S. Unnecesary Cesarean Sections: curing a national epidemic. Public Citizen Health Res Group 1994;10:1-7.