Modeling semantic containment and exclusion in natural language inference

Coling 2008 - 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2008, Pages 521-528

  MacCartney, Bill ^a   Manning, Christopher D ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER CIRCUITS; SEMANTICS; SYNTACTICS; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

INFERENCE PROBLEM; INTERMEDIATE NODE; MODEL SEMANTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGES; SEMANTIC INTERPRETATION; SEMANTIC PROPERTIES; STATISTICAL CLASSIFIER; SYNTACTIC FEATURES;

MODELING LANGUAGES;

EID: 78650447612     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1599081.1599147     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Akhmatova, Elena. 2005. Textual entailment resolution via atomic propositions. In Proceedings of the PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment.
2. Bos, Johan and Katja Markert. 2006. When logical inference helps determining textual entailment (and when it doesn't). In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognizing Textual Entailment.
3. Böttner, Michael. 1988. A note on existential import. Studia Logica, 47(1):35-40.
4. Dagan, Ido, Oren Glickman, and Bernardo Magnini. 2005. The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. In Proceedings of the PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment.
5. de Marneffe, Marie-Catherine, Bill MacCartney, Trond Grenager, Daniel Cer, Anna Rafferty, and Christopher D. Manning. 2006. Learning to distinguish valid textual entailments. In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognizing Textual Entailment.
6. Fowler, Abraham, Bob Hauser, Daniel Hodges, Ian Niles, Adrian Novischi, and Jens Stephan. 2005. Applying CO-GEX to recognize textual entailment. In Proceedings of the PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment.
7. Harabagiu, Sanda and Andrew Hickl. 2006. Using scenario knowledge in automatic question answering. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Task-Focused Summarization and Question Answering, pages 32-39, Sydney.
8. Harmeling, Stefan. 2007. An extensible probabilistic transformation-based approach to the Third Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge. In ACL-07 Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, Prague.
9. Hickl, Andrew, John Williams, Jeremy Bensley, Kirk Roberts, Bryan Rink, and Ying Shi. 2006. Recognizing textual entailment with LCC's GROUNDHOG system. In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognizing Textual Entailment.
10. Jiang, Jay J. and David W. Conrath. 1997. Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics.
11. Jijkoun, Valentin and Maarten de Rijke. 2005. Recognizing textual entailment using lexical similarity. In Proceedings of the PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognizing Textual Entailment, pages 73-76.
12. Klein, Dan and Christopher D. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of ACL-03, Sapporo.
13. Lakoff, George. 1970. Linguistics and natural logic. Synthese, 22:151-271.
14. Levy, Roger and Galen Andrew. 2006. Tregex and Tsurgeon: tools for querying and manipulating tree data structures. In Proceedings of LREC-06, Genoa.
15. MacCartney, Bill and Christopher D. Manning. 2007. Natural logic for textual inference. In ACL-07 Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, Prague.
16. MacCartney, Bill, Trond Grenager, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Daniel Cer, and Christopher D. Manning. 2006. Learning to recognize features of valid textual entailments. In Proceedings of NAACL-06, New York.
17. Marsi, Erwin and Emiel Krahmer. 2005. Classification of semantic relations by humans and machines. In ACL-05 Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment, Ann Arbor.
18. Nairn, Rowan, Cleo Condoravdi, and Lauri Karttunen. 2006. Computing relative polarity for textual inference. In Proceedings of ICoS-5 (Inference in Computational Semantics), Buxton, UK.
19. Romano, Lorenza, Milen Kouylekov, Idan Szpektor, Ido Dagan, and Alberto Lavelli. 2006. Investigating a generic paraphrase-based approach for relation extraction. In Proceedings of EACL 2006.
20. Sánchez Valencia, Victor. 1991. Studies on Natural Logic and Categorial Grammar. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam.
21. van Benthem, Johan. 1986. Essays in logical semantics. Reidel, Dordrecht.
22. van der Sandt, Rob A. 1992. Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics, 9(4):333-377.