Practical reasoning using values giving meaning to values

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6057 LNAI, Issue , 2010, Pages 79-93

  Van Der Weide, T L ^a   Dignum, F ^a   Meyer, J J Ch ^a   Prakken, H ^a   Vreeswijk, G A W ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PRACTICAL REASONING; PREFERENCE ORDER; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STATE TRANSITIONS; VALUE SYSTEMS;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 78650435499     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Rokeach, M.: The nature of human values. Free Press, New York (1973).
2. Schwartz, S.: Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in experimental social psychology 25, 1-65 (1992).
3. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., McBurney, P.: Computational representation of practical argument. Synthese 152(2), 157-206 (2006).
4. Bench-Capon, T.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3), 429-448 (2003).
5. Grasso, F., Cawsey, A., Jones, R.: Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: A case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition. International Journal of Human-Computers Studies 53(6), 1077-1115 (2000).
6. Rohan, M.: A rose by any name? the values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4(3), 255-277 (2000).
7. Castelfranchi, C., Miceli, M.: A cogntivie approach to values. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19(2), 170-193 (1989).
8. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T.: Addressing moral problems through practical reasoning. Journal of Applied Logic 6(2), 135-151 (2008); Selected papers from the 8th International Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science.
9. Perelman, C., Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.: The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press (1969).
10. Schwartz, S., Bilsky, W.: Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(3), 550-562 (1987).
11. Schwartz, S.: Robustness and fruitfulness of a theory of universals in individual values. Valores e trabalho (Values and work). Editora Universidade de Brasilia, Brasilia, pp. 56-95 (2005) (Též manuskript, 2003b).
12. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T.: Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems. Artificial Intelligence 171(10-15), 855-874 (2007).
13. Cohen, P., Levesque, H.: Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence 42(2-3), 213-261 (1990).
14. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling rational agents within a bdi-architecture, pp. 473-484 (1991).
15. Searle, J.R.: Rationality in Action. Bradford Books (2001).
16. Walton, D.: Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1996).