Splits or waves? Trees or webs? How divergence measures and network analysis can unravel language histories

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 365, Issue 1559, 2010, Pages 3829-3843

  Heggarty, Paul ^a   Maguire, Warren ^b   McMahon, April ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY ANTHROPOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Historical linguistics; Language divergence; Language history; Network; Phylogeny; Tree

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL HISTORY; CULTURAL TRADITION; LANGUAGE; MIGRATORY POPULATION; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; TERRITORIALITY;

EID: 78650342329     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0099     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anttila, R. 1989 Historical and comparative linguistics, 2nd edn. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
2. Atkinson, Q. D. & Gray, R. D. 2006 How old is the Indo-European language family? Progress or more moths to the flame? In Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages (eds P. Forster & C. Renfrew), pp. 91-109. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
3. Atkinson, Q. D., Nicholls, G., Welch, D. & Gray, R. D. 2005 From words to dates: water into wine, mathemagic or phylogenetic inference? Trans. Philol. Soc. 103, 193-219. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-968X.2005.00151.x)
4. Bandelt, H. J. & Dress, A. W. 1992 Split decomposition: a new and useful approach to phylogenetic analysis of distance data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1, 242-252. (doi:10.1016/1055-7903(92)90021-8)
5. Bandelt, H. J., Forster, P., Sykes, B. C. & Richards, M. B. 1995 Mitochondrial portraits of human populations. Genetics 141, 743-753.
6. Bandelt, H. J., Forster, P. & Röhl, A. 1999 Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 37-48.
7. Bryant, D. & Moulton, V. 2004 NeighborNet: an agglomerative algorithm for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 255-265. See www.ab.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/software/jsplits/. (doi:10.1093/molbev/ msh018)
8. Bryant, D., Filimon, F. & Gray, R. D. 2005 Untangling our past: languages, trees, splits and networks. In The evolution of cultural diversity: a phylogenetic approach (eds R. Mace, C. Holden & S. Shennan), pp. 67-84. London, UK: UCL Press.
9. Dyen, I., Kruskal, J. B. & Black, P. 1992 An Indo-European classification: a lexicostatistical experiment. Trans. Am. Phil. Soc. 82. See www.wordgumbo.com/ie/cmp/iedata.txt.
10. Forster, P. & Toth, A. 2003 Toward a phylogenetic chronology of ancient Gaulish, Celtic, and Indo-European. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9079-9084. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1331158100)
11. Forster, P., Toth, A. & Bandelt, H.-J. 1998 Evolutionary network analysis of word lists: visualizing the relationships between alpine Romance languages. J. Quant. Linguist.5, 174-187. (doi:10.1080/09296179808590125)
12. Forster, P., Polzin, T. & Röhl, A. 2006 Evolution of English basic vocabulary within the network of Germanic languages. In Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages (eds P. Forster & C. Renfrew), pp. 131-138. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
13. Gray, R. D. & Atkinson, Q. D. 2003 Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426, 435-439. (doi:10.1038/nature02029)
14. Gray, R. D., Bryant, D. & Greenhill, S. J. 2010 On the shape and fabric of human history. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 3923-3933. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0162)
15. Heggarty, P. 2005 Enigmas en el origen de las lenguas andinas: aplicando nuevas técnicas a las incógnitas por resolver. Rev. Andina. 40, 9-57.
16. Heggarty, P. 2006 Interdisciplinary indiscipline? Can phylogenetic methods meaningfully be applied to language data - and to dating language? In Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages (eds P. Forster & C. Renfrew), pp. 183-194. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
17. Heggarty, P. In preparation a. Barking up the wrong Indo-European tree?
18. Heggarty, P. In preparation b. How language lineages diverge: models vs. the real world.
19. Heggarty, P., McMahon, A. & McMahon, R. 2005 From phonetic similarity to dialect classification: a principled approach. In Perspectives on variation (eds N. Delbecque, J. van der Auwera & D. Geeraerts), pp. 43-91. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Mouton de Gruyter.
20. Holden, C. J. & Gray, R. D. 2006 Rapid radiation, borrowing and dialect continua in the Bantu languages. In Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages (eds P. Forster & C. Renfrew), pp. 19-31. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
21. Holland, B. & Moulton, V. 2003 Consensus networks: a method for visualizing incompatibilities in collections of trees. Algorithms in bioinformatics (eds G. Benson & R. Page), pp. 165-176. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
22. Huson, D. H. & Bryant, D. 2006 Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 254-267. See www.ab.informatik. uni.tuebingen.de/software/jsplits/. (doi:10.1093/molbev/msj030)
23. Maguire, W., McMahon, A., Heggarty, P. & Dediu, D. 2010 The past, present and future of English dialects: quantifying convergence, divergence and dynamic equilibrium. Lang. Variation Change 22, 69-104. (doi:10.1017/ S0954394510000013)
24. McMahon, A. & McMahon, R. 2005 Language classification by numbers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25. McMahon, A., Heggarty, P., McMahon, R. & Slaska, N. 2005 Swadesh sublists and the benefits of borrowing: an Andean case study. In Quantitative methods in language comparison - Transactions of the Philological Society, vol. 103 (ed. A. McMahon), pp. 147-169. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
26. McMahon, A., Heggarty, P., McMahon, R. & Maguire, W. 2007 The sound patterns of Englishes: representing phonetic similarity. Engl. Lang. Linguist. 11, 113-142. (doi:10.1017/S1360674306002139)
27. Nakhleh, L., Ringe, D. & Warnow, T. 2005 Perfect phylogenetic networks: a new methodology for reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages. Language 81, 382-420. (doi:10.1353/lan.2005.0078)
28. Pagel, M. & Meade, A. 2006 Estimating rates of lexical replacement on phylogenetic trees of languages. In Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages (eds P. Forster & C. Renfrew), pp. 173-182. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
29. Renfrew, C. 1989 Archaeology and language: the puzzle of Indo-European origins. London, UK: Penguin.
30. Ringe, D. A., Warnow, T. & Taylor, A. 2002 Indo-European and computational cladistics. Trans. Philol. Soc. 100, 59-129. See www.cs.rice.edu/~nakhleh/CPHL. (doi:10.1111/1467-968X.00091)
31. Robinson, O. W. 1992 Old English and its closest relatives. London, UK: Routledge.